Literature DB >> 25080866

Heteroscedastic Latent Trait Models for Dichotomous Data.

Dylan Molenaar1.   

Abstract

Effort has been devoted to account for heteroscedasticity with respect to observed or latent moderator variables in item or test scores. For instance, in the multi-group generalized linear latent trait model, it could be tested whether the observed (polychoric) covariance matrix differs across the levels of an observed moderator variable. In the case that heteroscedasticity arises across the latent trait itself, existing models commonly distinguish between heteroscedastic residuals and a skewed trait distribution. These models have valuable applications in intelligence, personality and psychopathology research. However, existing approaches are only limited to continuous and polytomous data, while dichotomous data are common in intelligence and psychopathology research. Therefore, in present paper, a heteroscedastic latent trait model is presented for dichotomous data. The model is studied in a simulation study, and applied to data pertaining alcohol use and cognitive ability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25080866     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-014-9406-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  21 in total

1.  The Raven's progressive matrices: change and stability over culture and time.

Authors:  J Raven
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Variance components models for gene-environment interaction in twin analysis.

Authors:  Shaun Purcell
Journal:  Twin Res       Date:  2002-12

3.  Factor Analysis of Ordinal Variables: A Comparison of Three Approaches.

Authors:  K G Jöreskog; I Moustaki
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  People are variables too: multilevel structural equations modeling.

Authors:  Paras D Mehta; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2005-09

5.  Detecting genotype-environment interaction in monozygotic twin data: comparing the Jinks and Fulker test and a new test based on Marginal Maximum Likelihood estimation.

Authors:  Sophie van der Sluis; Conor V Dolan; Michael C Neale; Dorret I Boomsma; Danielle Posthuma
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.587

Review 6.  Methodological issues in the assessment of substance use phenotypes.

Authors:  Michael C Neale; Steven H Aggen; Hermine H Maes; Thomas S Kubarych; J Eric Schmitt
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Heteroscedastic one-factor models and marginal maximum likelihood estimation.

Authors:  David J Hessen; Conor V Dolan
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.380

8.  Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions.

Authors:  Marti J Anderson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Testing for measurement invariance with respect to an ordinal variable.

Authors:  Edgar C Merkle; Jinyan Fan; Achim Zeileis
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  A Unidimensional Latent Trait Model for Continuous Item Responses.

Authors:  G J Mellenbergh
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  8 in total

1.  A Zero-Inflated Box-Cox Normal Unipolar Item Response Model for Measuring Constructs of Psychopathology.

Authors:  Brooke E Magnus; Yang Liu
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-06-14

2.  Asymmetric Item Characteristic Curves and Item Complexity: Insights from Simulation and Real Data Analyses.

Authors:  Sora Lee; Daniel M Bolt
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Parsimonious asymmetric item response theory modeling with the complementary log-log link.

Authors:  Hyejin Shim; Wes Bonifay; Wolfgang Wiedermann
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-03-30

4.  On the Choice of the Item Response Model for Scaling PISA Data: Model Selection Based on Information Criteria and Quantifying Model Uncertainty.

Authors:  Alexander Robitzsch
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.738

5.  A more general model for testing measurement invariance and differential item functioning.

Authors:  Daniel J Bauer
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2016-06-06

6.  Exploring the Multiverse of Analytical Decisions in Scaling Educational Large-Scale Assessment Data: A Specification Curve Analysis for PISA 2018 Mathematics Data.

Authors:  Alexander Robitzsch
Journal:  Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ       Date:  2022-07-07

7.  Asymptotic Robustness Study of the Polychoric Correlation Estimation.

Authors:  Shaobo Jin; Fan Yang-Wallentin
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Application of Asymmetric IRT Modeling to Discrete-Option Multiple-Choice Test Items.

Authors:  Daniel M Bolt; Sora Lee; James Wollack; Carol Eckerly; John Sowles
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.