Literature DB >> 25107442

Four perspectives on self-management support by nurses for people with chronic conditions: a Q-methodological study.

Susanne M van Hooft1, Jolanda Dwarswaard2, Susan Jedeloo3, Roland Bal4, AnneLoes van Staa2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-management support is a major task of nurses in chronic care. Several conceptualizations on what self-management support encompasses are described in the literature. However, nurses' attitudes and perceptions related to self-management support are not known.
OBJECTIVE: To reveal distinctive perspectives of nurses toward self-management support in chronic care. DESIGN AND METHODS: A Q-methodological study was conducted in which nurses rank-ordered 37 statements on self-management support. Thereafter they motivated their ranking in semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS AND
SETTING: A purposive sample of 49 Dutch nurses with a variety of educational levels, age, and from different healthcare settings was invited by e-mail to participate in the study. Thirty-nine nurses (aged 21-54 years) eventually participated. The nurses worked in the following settings: hospital (n=11, 28%), home-care (n=14, 36%), mental health care (n=7, 17%), elderly care (n=6, 15%) and general practice (n=1, 3%).
RESULTS: Four distinct perspectives on the goals for self-management support were identified: the Coach, the Clinician, the Gatekeeper and the Educator perspective. The Coach nurse focuses on the patient's daily life activities, whereas the nurses of the Clinician type aim to achieve adherence to treatment. The goal of self-management support from the Gatekeeper perspective is to reduce health care costs. Finally, the Educator nurse focuses on instructing patients in managing the illness.
CONCLUSIONS: The changing role of chronic patients with regard to self-management asks for a new understanding of nurses' supportive tasks. Nurses appear to have dissimilar perceptions of what self-management support entails. These distinct perceptions reflect different patient realities and demand that nurses are capable of reflexivity and sensitivity to patient needs. Different perspectives toward self-management support also call for diverse competencies and consequently, also for adaptation of educational nursing programs.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic disease; Nurse's role; Nursing; Q-methodology; Self-care; Self-management support

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25107442     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  11 in total

Review 1.  Self-management support from the perspective of patients with a chronic condition: a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Jolanda Dwarswaard; Ellen J M Bakker; AnneLoes van Staa; Hennie R Boeije
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  How do nurses support chronically ill clients' participation and self-management in primary care? A cross-country qualitative study.

Authors:  Kerstin Hämel; Gundula Röhnsch; Marcus Heumann; Dirce Stein Backes; Beatriz Rosana Gonçalves de Oliveira Toso; Ligia Giovanella
Journal:  BMC Prim Care       Date:  2022-04-18

3.  Self-management of patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review of experiences and attitudes.

Authors:  Sophie I van Dongen; Kim de Nooijer; Jane M Cramm; Anneke L Francke; Wendy H Oldenmenger; Ida J Korfage; Frederika E Witkamp; Rik Stoevelaar; Agnes van der Heide; Judith Ac Rietjens
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.762

4.  Evaluating the feasibility of a nurse-led self-management support intervention for kidney transplant recipients: a pilot study.

Authors:  Janet M J Been-Dahmen; Denise K Beck; Mariëlle A C Peeters; Heleen van der Stege; Mirjam Tielen; Marleen C van Buren; Erwin Ista; AnneLoes van Staa; Emma K Massey
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 2.585

5.  Smartphone-Based Remote Self-Management of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Jingyi Yang; Quan Wei; Yanlei Ge; Lijiao Meng; Meidan Zhao
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 2.682

6.  Trust in older persons: A quantitative analysis of alignment in triads of older persons, informal carers and home care nurses.

Authors:  Kirti D Doekhie; Mathilde M H Strating; Martina Buljac-Samardzic; Jaap Paauwe
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2019-07-26

7.  Profiles of family caregivers of patients at the end of life at home: a Q-methodological study into family caregiver' support needs.

Authors:  Femmy M Bijnsdorp; H Roeline W Pasman; Cécile R L Boot; Susanne M van Hooft; AnneLoes van Staa; Anneke L Francke
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.234

8.  Patients as team members: Factors affecting involvement in treatment decisions from the perspective of patients with a chronic condition.

Authors:  Martina Buljac-Samardzic; Mark A Clark; N Job A van Exel; Jeroen D H van Wijngaarden
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Are We Transitioning Toward Person-centered Practice on Self-management Support? An Explorative Case Study Among Rheumatology Outpatient Clinic Nurses in Norway.

Authors:  Heike Fischer; Kjersti Grønning
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2021-10-06

10.  The different perspectives of patients, informal caregivers and professionals on patient involvement in primary care teams. A qualitative study.

Authors:  Kirti D Doekhie; Mathilde M H Strating; Martina Buljac-Samardzic; Hester M van de Bovenkamp; Jaap Paauwe
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.