Literature DB >> 25106008

Longitudinal implant stability measurements based on resonance frequency analysis after placement in healed or regenerated bone.

Giorgio Deli1, Vincenzo Petrone, Valeria De Risi, Drazen Tadic, Gregory-George Zafiropoulos.   

Abstract

Primary stability is an indicator of subsequent osseointegration of dental implants. However, few studies have compared the implant stability among anatomical regions and bone types; thus, not enough data exist regarding the stability of implants placed in regenerated bone (RB). The present study evaluated primary and long-term stability of implants placed in RB and non-regenerated healed bone (HB). A total of 216 screw cylinder implants were placed in 216 patients (98 in HB and 118 in RB, 6 [RB6, N = 68] or 12 [RB12, N = 50] months after tooth extraction). Implant stability was evaluated using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measured at the time of implant placement (E1), at the time of loading (4 months after placement, E2), and 4 months after loading (E3). Various clinically relevant measurements were obtained, such as implant diameter, length, and location, as well as bone quality. At E1, implant location, bone quality, and experimental group significantly affected implant stability (all at P < .05). At E2, implant location, diameter, length, and experimental group significantly affected implant stability (all at P < .05). At E3, bone quality, implant diameter, length, and experimental group significantly affected implant stability (all at P < .01). Stability for the RB12 group was significantly higher than all other corresponding values; further, the values did not change significantly over time. For the HB and RB6 groups, stability was significantly higher at E2 than at E1 (P < .001) and was no different between E2 and E3. Implant location, length, and experimental group were associated with these differences (all at P < .05). Compared with HB and RB6, higher implant stability may be achieved in regenerated bone 12 months post-extraction (RB12). This stability was achieved at E1 and maintained for at least 8 months. Variables such as implant length, diameter, and bone quality affected the stability differently over time. Implant stability varied in different anatomic regions and with regard to different healing processes in the bone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dental implants; extraction socket; guided bone regeneration; implant stability; regenerated bone; resonance frequency analysis/RFA; ridge preservation; socket preservation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25106008     DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  4 in total

1.  Mathematical evaluation of the influence of multiple factors on implant stability quotient values in clinical practice: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Hairong Huang; Daniel Wismeijer; Xianhong Shao; Gang Wu
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Clinical evaluation of the stability of implants placed at different supracrestal levels.

Authors:  B Alper Gultekin; Ali Sirali; Pinar Gultekin; Selim Ersanli
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2016-10-01

3.  The Effect of Smoking Behavior on Alveolar Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells of Clinical Implant Patient.

Authors:  Xicong Zhao; Bin Zhu; Yan Duan; Xin Wang; Dehua Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Dental Implant Outcomes in Grafted Sockets: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ausra Ramanauskaite; Tiago Borges; Bruno Leitão Almeida; Andre Correia
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2019-09-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.