Literature DB >> 25105559

Multicenter study of environmental contamination with antineoplastic drugs in 36 Canadian hospitals: a 2013 follow-up study.

M Berruyer1, C Tanguay, N J Caron, M Lefebvre, J F Bussières.   

Abstract

No occupational exposure limit exists for antineoplastic drugs. The main objective of this study was to describe environmental contamination with cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and methotrexate in pharmacy and patient care areas of Canadian hospitals in 2013. The secondary objective was to compare the 2013 environmental monitoring results with previous studies. Six standardized sites in the pharmacy and six sites on patient care areas were sampled in each participating center. Samples were analyzed for the presence of cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and methotrexate by UPLC-MSMS. The limit of detection (LOD) in pg/cm(2) was 1.8 for cyclophosphamide, 2.2 for ifosfamide, and 7.5 for methotrexate. The 75th percentile of cyclophosphamide concentration was compared between the 2013, 2008-2010, and 2012 studies. Thirty-six hospitals participated in the study and 422 samples were collected. Overall, 47% (198/422) of the samples were positive for cyclophosphamide, 18% (75/422) were positive for ifosfamide, and 3% (11/422) were positive for methotrexate. In 2013, the 75th percentile value of cyclophosphamide surface concentration was reduced to 8.4pg/cm(2) (n = 36), compared with 9.4pg/cm(2) in 2012 (n = 33) and 40pg/cm(2) (n = 25) in 2008-2010. The 75th percentile for ifosfamide and methotrexate concentration remained lower than the LOD. The 2013 study shows an improvement in the surface contamination level, and a plateau effect in the proportion of positive samples.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cyclophosphamide; environmental monitoring; hospital; ifosfamide; methotrexate; occupational exposure; pharmacy service

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25105559     DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2014.949725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  7 in total

1.  Field evaluation of onsite near real-time monitors for surface contamination by 5-fluorouracil.

Authors:  Jerome P Smith; Deborah Sammons; Shirley Robertson; Edward Krieg; John Snawder
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 1.809

2.  Causes of Health Care Workers' Exposure to Antineoplastic Drugs: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Chun-Yip Hon; Dina Abusitta
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2016-06-30

Review 3. 

Authors:  Céline Poupeau; Christel Roland; Jean-François Bussières
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2016-10-31

Review 4.  A review of high performance liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric urinary methods for anticancer drug exposure of health care workers.

Authors:  Patricia I Mathias; Thomas H Connor; Clayton B'Hymer
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.205

5.  Environmental Contamination with Cyclophosphamide, Ifosfamide, and Methotrexate: A Study of 51 Canadian Centres.

Authors:  Alexia Janes; Cynthia Tanguay; Nicolas J Caron; Jean-François Bussières
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

6.  CE: Original Research: Antineoplastic Drug Administration by Pregnant and Nonpregnant Nurses: An Exploration of the Use of Protective Gloves and Gowns.

Authors:  Christina C Lawson; Candice Y Johnson; Feiby L Nassan; Thomas H Connor; James M Boiano; Carissa M Rocheleau; Jorge E Chavarro; Janet W Rich-Edwards
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.220

Review 7.  Closed-system drug-transfer devices plus safe handling of hazardous drugs versus safe handling alone for reducing exposure to infusional hazardous drugs in healthcare staff.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Lawrence Mj Best; Cynthia Tanguay; Elaine Lennan; Mika Korva; Jean-François Bussières
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.