Literature DB >> 25103878

Detection of temporal lobe epilepsy using support vector machines in multi-parametric quantitative MR imaging.

Diego Cantor-Rivera1, Ali R Khan2, Maged Goubran3, Seyed M Mirsattari4, Terry M Peters5.   

Abstract

The detection of MRI abnormalities that can be associated to seizures in the study of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is a challenging task. In many cases, patients with a record of epileptic activity do not present any discernible MRI findings. In this domain, we propose a method that combines quantitative relaxometry and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) with support vector machines (SVM) aiming to improve TLE detection. The main contribution of this work is two-fold: on one hand, the feature selection process, principal component analysis (PCA) transformations of the feature space, and SVM parameterization are analyzed as factors constituting a classification model and influencing its quality. On the other hand, several of these classification models are studied to determine the optimal strategy for the identification of TLE patients using data collected from multi-parametric quantitative MRI. A total of 17 TLE patients and 19 control volunteers were analyzed. Four images were considered for each subject (T1 map, T2 map, fractional anisotropy, and mean diffusivity) generating 936 regions of interest per subject, then 8 different classification models were studied, each one comprised by a distinct set of factors. Subjects were correctly classified with an accuracy of 88.9%. Further analysis revealed that the heterogeneous nature of the disease impeded an optimal outcome. After dividing patients into cohesive groups (9 left-sided seizure onset, 8 right-sided seizure onset) perfect classification for the left group was achieved (100% accuracy) whereas the accuracy for the right group remained the same (88.9%). We conclude that a linear SVM combined with an ANOVA-based feature selection+PCA method is a good alternative in scenarios like ours where feature spaces are high dimensional, and the sample size is limited. The good accuracy results and the localization of the respective features in the temporal lobe suggest that a multi-parametric quantitative MRI, ROI-based, SVM classification could be used for the identification of TLE patients. This method has the potential to improve the diagnostic assessment, especially for patients who do not have any obvious lesions in standard radiological examinations.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANOVA; DESPOT; DTI; Epilepsy; FA; Feature selection; MD; MRI; MRMR; Machine learning; PCA; Quantitative imaging; ROI; SVM; Support vector machines; TLE

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25103878     DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph        ISSN: 0895-6111            Impact factor:   4.790


  10 in total

1.  In vivo MRI signatures of hippocampal subfield pathology in intractable epilepsy.

Authors:  Maged Goubran; Boris C Bernhardt; Diego Cantor-Rivera; Jonathan C Lau; Charlotte Blinston; Robert R Hammond; Sandrine de Ribaupierre; Jorge G Burneo; Seyed M Mirsattari; David A Steven; Andrew G Parrent; Andrea Bernasconi; Neda Bernasconi; Terry M Peters; Ali R Khan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Informatics and machine learning to define the phenotype.

Authors:  Anna Okula Basile; Marylyn DeRiggi Ritchie
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 5.225

3.  Individual feature maps: a patient-specific analysis tool with applications in temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Diego Cantor-Rivera; John S H Baxter; Sandrine de Ribaupierrre; Jonathan C Lau; Seyed M Mirsattari; Maged Goubran; Jorge G Burneo; David A Steven; Terry M Peters; Ali R Khan
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Automated diagnosis of temporal lobe epilepsy in the absence of interictal spikes.

Authors:  Thibault Verhoeven; Ana Coito; Gijs Plomp; Aljoscha Thomschewski; Francesca Pittau; Eugen Trinka; Roland Wiest; Karl Schaller; Christoph Michel; Margitta Seeck; Joni Dambre; Serge Vulliemoz; Pieter van Mierlo
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 4.881

5.  Computational modelling in source space from scalp EEG to inform presurgical evaluation of epilepsy.

Authors:  Marinho A Lopes; Leandro Junges; Luke Tait; John R Terry; Eugenio Abela; Mark P Richardson; Marc Goodfellow
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Learning to see the invisible: A data-driven approach to finding the underlying patterns of abnormality in visually normal brain magnetic resonance images in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Oscar F Bennett; Baris Kanber; Chandrashekar Hoskote; M Jorge Cardoso; Sebastien Ourselin; John S Duncan; Gavin P Winston
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.864

7.  Multi-Head Self-Attention Model for Classification of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Subtypes.

Authors:  Peipei Gu; Ting Wu; Mingyang Zou; Yijie Pan; Jiayang Guo; Jianbing Xiahou; Xueping Peng; Hailong Li; Junxia Ma; Ling Zhang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Classification of partial seizures based on functional connectivity: A MEG study with support vector machine.

Authors:  Yingwei Wang; Zhongjie Li; Yujin Zhang; Yingming Long; Xinyan Xie; Ting Wu
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  Comparison of multimodal findings on epileptogenic side in temporal lobe epilepsy using self-organizing maps.

Authors:  Alireza Fallahi; Mohammad Pooyan; Jafar Mehvari Habibabadi; Mohammad-Reza Nazem-Zadeh
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Detection of Lesions Underlying Intractable Epilepsy on T1-Weighted MRI as an Outlier Detection Problem.

Authors:  Meriem El Azami; Alexander Hammers; Julien Jung; Nicolas Costes; Romain Bouet; Carole Lartizien
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.