Miguel Quintela-Fandino1, Maria J Bueno2, Luis Lombardia2, Marta Gil3, Antonio Gonzalez-Martin4, Raul Marquez4, Raquel Bratos4, Juan Guerra5, Eugene Tan6, Antonio Lopez2, Ramon Colomer7, Ramon Salazar3. 1. Breast Cancer Clinical Research Unit, CNIO-Spanish National Cancer Research Center, Madrid, Spain; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain; Medical Oncology Department, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: mquintela@cnio.es. 2. Breast Cancer Clinical Research Unit, CNIO-Spanish National Cancer Research Center, Madrid, Spain. 3. Medical Oncology Department, ICO-Bellvitge, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Medical Oncology Department, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain. 5. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain. 6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA. 7. Breast Cancer Clinical Research Unit, CNIO-Spanish National Cancer Research Center, Madrid, Spain; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Given our preclinical data showing synergy between dovitinib and paclitaxel in preclinical models we conducted this phase I trial aiming to define the recommended phase II-dose (RP2D) on the basis of toxicity and pharmacodynamic criteria while searching for genetic variants that could sensitize patients to the regimen under study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 3+3 escalation schedule was adopted. Seriated FGF23 and dovitinib and paclitaxel pharmacokinetic profiles were determined along a single-agent dovitinib "priming-phase" followed by a dovitinib + paclitaxel combination phase. RECIST 1.1 criteria and NCI CTCAE V.4.0 were used. In fresh pre-treatment tumor biopsy samples, FGFR1, 2 and 3 amplifications were revealed by FISH probes; 32 missense variants were genotyped in tumors and peripheral blood mononuclear cells with Taqman genotyping assays (FGFR1-3 and RET). Constructs encoding for wild-type and variant genes associated with clinical benefit were transfected into HEK-293 cells for preclinical experiments checking constitutive activation and dovitinib sensitivity of the variants. RESULTS: twelve patients were recruited in three dose-levels. At level 1B (200 mg dovitinib 5-days-on/2-days-off plus 60 mg/m 2-week of paclitaxel) more than 50% FGF23 upregulation was observed and no dose-limiting-toxicities (DLTs) occurred. The most frequent toxicities were asthenia, neutropenia, nausea/vomiting and transaminitis. Two patients with progressive disease prior to trial inclusion achieved prolonged disease stabilization. Both had the germline variant G2071A in the RET gene, which led to constitutive activation of the protein product and Y-905 phosphorylation, both in transfectants and in patients with the alteration. This variant was sensitive to dovitinib; in addition both patients experienced progression upon medication withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: Level 1B was the RP2D as it provided adequate pharmacodynamic exposure to dovitinib. The G2071A germline variant act as a genetic modifier that renders different tumors sensitive to dovitinib.
BACKGROUND: Given our preclinical data showing synergy between dovitinib and paclitaxel in preclinical models we conducted this phase I trial aiming to define the recommended phase II-dose (RP2D) on the basis of toxicity and pharmacodynamic criteria while searching for genetic variants that could sensitize patients to the regimen under study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 3+3 escalation schedule was adopted. Seriated FGF23 and dovitinib and paclitaxel pharmacokinetic profiles were determined along a single-agent dovitinib "priming-phase" followed by a dovitinib + paclitaxel combination phase. RECIST 1.1 criteria and NCI CTCAE V.4.0 were used. In fresh pre-treatment tumor biopsy samples, FGFR1, 2 and 3 amplifications were revealed by FISH probes; 32 missense variants were genotyped in tumors and peripheral blood mononuclear cells with Taqman genotyping assays (FGFR1-3 and RET). Constructs encoding for wild-type and variant genes associated with clinical benefit were transfected into HEK-293 cells for preclinical experiments checking constitutive activation and dovitinib sensitivity of the variants. RESULTS: twelve patients were recruited in three dose-levels. At level 1B (200 mg dovitinib 5-days-on/2-days-off plus 60 mg/m 2-week of paclitaxel) more than 50% FGF23 upregulation was observed and no dose-limiting-toxicities (DLTs) occurred. The most frequent toxicities were asthenia, neutropenia, nausea/vomiting and transaminitis. Two patients with progressive disease prior to trial inclusion achieved prolonged disease stabilization. Both had the germline variant G2071A in the RET gene, which led to constitutive activation of the protein product and Y-905 phosphorylation, both in transfectants and in patients with the alteration. This variant was sensitive to dovitinib; in addition both patients experienced progression upon medication withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: Level 1B was the RP2D as it provided adequate pharmacodynamic exposure to dovitinib. The G2071A germline variant act as a genetic modifier that renders different tumors sensitive to dovitinib.
Authors: Neal E Ready; Alan Lipton; Yali Zhu; Paul Statkevich; Emily Frank; Dolores Curtis; Ronald M Bukowski Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jesus Garcia-Donas; Emilio Esteban; Luis Javier Leandro-García; Daniel E Castellano; Aranzazu González del Alba; Miguel Angel Climent; José Angel Arranz; Enrique Gallardo; Javier Puente; Joaquim Bellmunt; Begoña Mellado; Esther Martínez; Fernando Moreno; Albert Font; Mercedes Robledo; Cristina Rodríguez-Antona Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Kevin B Kim; Jason Chesney; Douglas Robinson; Humphrey Gardner; Michael M Shi; John M Kirkwood Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Sang Hoon Lee; Daniel Lopes de Menezes; Jayesh Vora; Alex Harris; Helen Ye; Lara Nordahl; Evelyn Garrett; Emil Samara; Sharon Lea Aukerman; Arnold B Gelb; Carla Heise Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-05-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Eric Angevin; Jose A Lopez-Martin; Chia-Chi Lin; Jürgen E Gschwend; Andrea Harzstark; Daniel Castellano; Jean-Charles Soria; Paramita Sen; Julie Chang; Michael Shi; Andrea Kay; Bernard Escudier Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-01-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Thomas E Hutson; David Cella; James Reeves; Robert Hawkins; Jun Guo; Paul Nathan; Michael Staehler; Paul de Souza; Jaime R Merchan; Ekaterini Boleti; Kate Fife; Jie Jin; Robert Jones; Hirotsugu Uemura; Ugo De Giorgi; Ulrika Harmenberg; Jinwan Wang; Cora N Sternberg; Keith Deen; Lauren McCann; Michelle D Hackshaw; Rocco Crescenzo; Lini N Pandite; Toni K Choueiri Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Luis G Paz-Ares; Bonne Biesma; David Heigener; Joachim von Pawel; Timothy Eisen; Jaafar Bennouna; Li Zhang; Meilin Liao; Yan Sun; Steven Gans; Kostas Syrigos; Etienne Le Marie; Maya Gottfried; Johan Vansteenkiste; Vincente Alberola; Uwe Phillip Strauss; Elaine Montegriffo; Teng Jin Ong; Armando Santoro Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-07-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Miguel Quintela-Fandino; Maria J Bueno; Luis Lombardia; Marta Gil; Antonio Gonzalez-Martin; Raul Marquez; Raquel Bratos; Juan Guerra; Eugene Tan; Antonio Lopez; Ramon Colomer; Ramon Salazar Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 6.603