Literature DB >> 25103125

A randomized controlled pilot trial of the functional assessment screening tablet to engage patients at the point of care.

Rachel Hess1, Hilary Tindle, Molly B Conroy, Sunday Clark, Eric Yablonsky, Ron D Hays.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthcare providers play an important role in encouraging healthy behaviors and improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL). They are most effective when they partner with informed, engaged patients.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of a new health-information technology intervention (FAST-Feedback) that provides patients with immediate, personalized, guideline-based feedback regarding tobacco use, physical activity, and HRQoL, and encourages patients to initiate discussions regarding these topics with their primary care physician.
DESIGN: A pilot, randomized controlled trial clustered by resident physician, with patients as the unit of analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Resident physicians and their out-patients in a single academic health center between May and October 2011. INTERVENTION: Patients received (intervention) or did not receive (control) FAST-Feedback prior to the clinical encounter. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were patient reports of initiating any discussions regarding tobacco use, physical activity, and HRQoL. Subgroup analyses examined patient reports of discussions regarding tobacco use, physical activity, and HRQoL, respectively. KEY
RESULTS: Thirty of the 36 eligible resident physicians (83%) agreed to participate; 173 of their 415 eligible patients (42%) expressed interest in the study and 99 (24%) consented to participate. Compared to controls, a higher percentage of intervention patients reported initiating any discussion with their resident physician, although this difference was not statistically significant (40% vs. 27%; p = 0.12). For subgroup analyses regarding specific topics of discussion, patients in the intervention group reported initiating more discussions regarding mental HRQoL than controls (23% vs. 0%; p = 0.02). There was no difference in patient reports of initiating discussions regarding smoking, physical activity or physical HRQoL.
CONCLUSIONS: Providing patients with immediate, personalized, guideline-based feedback prior to the clinical encounter can increase patient-initiated discussions regarding mental HRQoL. Future work should test FAST-Feedback in a larger population and evaluate the impact on tobacco cessation, increased physical activity, and improvements in HRQoL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25103125      PMCID: PMC4242881          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-2984-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  25 in total

Review 1.  The role of feedback in the process of health behavior change.

Authors:  C C DiClemente; A S Marinilli; M Singh; L E Bellino
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2001 May-Jun

Review 2.  The application and impact of computer-generated personalized nutrition education: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J Brug; M Campbell; P van Assema
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1999-02

3.  Primary care: is there enough time for prevention?

Authors:  Kimberly S H Yarnall; Kathryn I Pollak; Truls Østbye; Katrina M Krause; J Lloyd Michener
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Randomized controlled study of a retiree health promotion program. The Bank of American Study.

Authors:  J P Leigh; N Richardson; R Beck; C Kerr; H Harrington; C L Parcell; J F Fries
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1992-06

5.  Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Symone B Detmar; Martin J Muller; Jan H Schornagel; Lidwina D V Wever; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Physician advice and support for physical activity: results from a national survey.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; E G Eakin; E B Fisher; S J Bacak; R C Brownson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Multiple realities in a study of medical consultations.

Authors:  Christine A Barry
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2002-10

8.  Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  RCT of web-based personalized normative feedback for college drinking prevention: are typical student norms good enough?

Authors:  Joseph W Labrie; Melissa A Lewis; David C Atkins; Clayton Neighbors; Cheng Zheng; Shannon R Kenney; Lucy E Napper; Theresa Walter; Jason R Kilmer; Justin F Hummer; Joel Grossbard; Tehniat M Ghaidarov; Sruti Desai; Christine M Lee; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2013-08-12

Review 10.  Do multiple outcome measures require p-value adjustment?

Authors:  Ronald J Feise
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  3 in total

1.  Capsule commentary on Hess et al. A randomized controlled pilot trial of the functional assessment screening tablet to engage patients at the point of care.

Authors:  Erika Litvin Bloom
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Prescription Tablets in the Digital Age: A Cross-Sectional Study Exploring Patient and Physician Attitudes Toward the Use of Tablets for Clinic-Based Personalized Health Care Information Exchange.

Authors:  Vishal Patel; Timothy M Hale; Sandeep Palakodeti; Joseph C Kvedar; Kamal Jethwani
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2015-10-19

3.  Does information form matter when giving tailored risk information to patients in clinical settings? A review of patients' preferences and responses.

Authors:  Rebecca Harris; Claire Noble; Victoria Lowers
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.711

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.