Literature DB >> 23937346

RCT of web-based personalized normative feedback for college drinking prevention: are typical student norms good enough?

Joseph W Labrie1, Melissa A Lewis, David C Atkins, Clayton Neighbors, Cheng Zheng, Shannon R Kenney, Lucy E Napper, Theresa Walter, Jason R Kilmer, Justin F Hummer, Joel Grossbard, Tehniat M Ghaidarov, Sruti Desai, Christine M Lee, Mary E Larimer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Personalized normative feedback (PNF) interventions are generally effective at correcting normative misperceptions and reducing risky alcohol consumption among college students. However, research has yet to establish what level of reference group specificity is most efficacious in delivering PNF. This study compared the efficacy of a web-based PNF intervention using 8 increasingly specific reference groups against a Web-BASICS intervention and a repeated-assessment control in reducing risky drinking and associated consequences.
METHOD: Participants were 1,663 heavy-drinking Caucasian and Asian undergraduates at 2 universities. The referent for web-based PNF was either the typical same-campus student or a same-campus student at 1 (either gender, race, or Greek affiliation), or a combination of 2 (e.g., gender and race), or all 3 levels of specificity (i.e., gender, race, and Greek affiliation). Hypotheses were tested using quasi-Poisson generalized linear models fit by generalized estimating equations.
RESULTS: The PNF intervention participants showed modest reductions in all 4 outcomes (average total drinks, peak drinking, drinking days, and drinking consequences) compared with control participants. No significant differences in drinking outcomes were found between the PNF group as a whole and the Web-BASICS group. Among the 8 PNF conditions, participants receiving typical student PNF demonstrated greater reductions in all 4 outcomes compared with those receiving PNF for more specific reference groups. Perceived drinking norms and discrepancies between individual behavior and actual norms mediated the efficacy of the intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest a web-based PNF intervention using the typical student referent offers a parsimonious approach to reducing problematic alcohol use outcomes among college students.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23937346      PMCID: PMC3983963          DOI: 10.1037/a0034087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  48 in total

1.  In praise of feedback: an effective intervention for college students who are heavy drinkers.

Authors:  S T Walters
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2000-03

2.  Providing personalized assessment feedback for problem drinking on the Internet: a pilot project.

Authors:  J A Cunningham; K Humphreys; A Koski-Jännes
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2000-11

3.  Misperceiving the college drinking norm and related problems: a nationwide study of exposure to prevention information, perceived norms and student alcohol misuse.

Authors:  H Wesley Perkins; Michael P Haines; Richard Rice
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2005-07

Review 4.  Social norms approaches using descriptive drinking norms education: a review of the research on personalized normative feedback.

Authors:  Melissa A Lewis; Clayton Neighbors
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb

5.  Episode-centred analysis of drinking to intoxication in university students.

Authors:  Kypros Kypri; John Langley; Shaun Stephenson
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2005-07-04       Impact factor: 2.826

6.  Ethnicity specific norms and alcohol consumption among Hispanic/Latino/a and Caucasian students.

Authors:  Joseph W LaBrie; David C Atkins; Clayton Neighbors; Tehniat Mirza; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Gender-specific misperceptions of college student drinking norms.

Authors:  Melissa A Lewis; Clayton Neighbors
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2004-12

8.  The efficacy of the social norms approach to substance abuse prevention applied to fraternity men.

Authors:  C A Carter; W M Kahnweiler
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2000-09

9.  Who is the typical college student? Implications for personalized normative feedback interventions.

Authors:  Melissa A Lewis; Clayton Neighbors
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 10.  Randomization in substance abuse clinical trials.

Authors:  Sarra L Hedden; Robert F Woolson; Robert J Malcolm
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2006-02-06
View more
  56 in total

1.  Brief online interventions targeting risk and protective factors for increased and problematic alcohol use among American college students studying abroad.

Authors:  Eric R Pedersen; Clayton Neighbors; David C Atkins; Christine M Lee; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2017-01-12

2.  A sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) protocol for empirically developing an adaptive preventive intervention for college student drinking reduction.

Authors:  Megan E Patrick; Jeffrey A Boatman; Nicole Morrell; Anna C Wagner; Grace R Lyden; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Cheryl A King; Erin E Bonar; Christine M Lee; Mary E Larimer; David M Vock; Daniel Almirall
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Leveraging copresence to increase the effectiveness of gamified personalized normative feedback.

Authors:  Joseph W LaBrie; Jennifer L de Rutte; Sarah C Boyle; Cara N Tan; Andrew M Earle
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.913

4.  The moderating role of cognitive capacities in the association between social norms and drinking behaviors.

Authors:  Samuel N Meisel; Craig R Colder; Larry W Hawk
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Efficacy of personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for college student gambling: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Clayton Neighbors; Lindsey M Rodriguez; Dipali V Rinker; Rubi G Gonzales; Maigen Agana; Jennifer L Tackett; Dawn W Foster
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2015-06

6.  The Chicken or the Egg: Examining Temporal Precedence Among Attitudes, Injunctive Norms, and College Student Drinking.

Authors:  Melissa A Lewis; Dana M Litt; Clayton Neighbors
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.582

7.  Increasing Chance-Based Uncertainty Reduces Heavy Drinkers' Cognitive Reactance to Web-Based Personalized Normative Feedback.

Authors:  Sarah C Boyle; Andrew M Earle; Nate McCabe; Joseph W LaBrie
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.582

8.  Comparing perceived public stigma and personal stigma of mental health treatment seeking in a young adult sample.

Authors:  Eric R Pedersen; Andrew P Paves
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  Brief Alcohol Interventions for Youth in the Emergency Department: Exploring Proximal and Distal Outcomes.

Authors:  Mary Kathryn Cancilliere; Anthony Spirito; Peter Monti; Nancy Barnett
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse       Date:  2019-01-28

Review 10.  Comparative Effectiveness of Brief Alcohol Interventions for College Students: Results from a Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Emily Alden Hennessy; Emily E Tanner-Smith; Dimitris Mavridis; Sean P Grant
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2019-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.