Literature DB >> 25102251

Group prenatal care: review of outcomes and recommendations for model implementation.

Ellen L Tilden1, Sally R Hersh1, Cathy L Emeis1, Sarah R Weinstein1, Aaron B Caughey2.   

Abstract

The intent and delivery of prenatal care have evolved since its formal inception in the early 1900s. Group prenatal care offers an alternative care delivery model to the currently dominant prenatal care model. The group model has been associated with a number of improved perinatal outcomes including decreased preterm birth, higher birth weight, improved breast-feeding initiation and duration, decreased cesarean delivery, and greater patient satisfaction. This article outlines the tenets of CenteringPregnancy, the current dominant form of group prenatal care, reviews literature regarding perinatal outcomes related to group prenatal care, suggests future research agendas, and highlights relevant considerations when implementing this alternate model of prenatal health care delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25102251     DOI： 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv        ISSN： 0029-7828            Impact factor:   2.347


  7 in total

1.  The Impact of Introducing Centering Pregnancy in a Community Health Setting: A Qualitative Study of Experiences and Perspectives of Health Center Clinical and Support Staff.

Authors:  Ania Kania-Richmond; Erin Hetherington; Deborah McNeil; Hamideh Bayrampour; Suzanne Tough; Amy Metcalfe
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-06

2.  Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators During Implementation of a Complex Model of Group Prenatal Care in Six Urban Sites.

Authors:  Gina Novick; Julie A Womack; Jessica Lewis; Emily C Stasko; Sharon S Rising; Lois S Sadler; Shayna C Cunningham; Jonathan N Tobin; Jeannette R Ickovics
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  Predictors of prenatal care satisfaction among pregnant women in American Samoa.

Authors:  Oluwaseyi Adeyinka; Anne Marie Jukic; Stephen T McGarvey; Bethel T Muasau-Howard; Mata'uitafa Faiai; Nicola L Hawley
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 4.  Group prenatal care: effectiveness and challenges to implementation.

Authors:  Zafiro Andrade-Romo; Ileana B Heredia-Pi; Evelyn Fuentes-Rivera; Jacqueline Alcalde-Rabanal; Lourdes Bravo Bolaños Cacho; Laurie Jurkiewicz; Blair G Darney
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.106

5.  CenteringPregnancy in the Netherlands: Who engages, who doesn't, and why.

Authors:  Mary-Ann R Wagijo; Mathilde R Crone; Birgit S van Zwicht; Jan M M van Lith; Sharon Schindler Rising; Marlies E B Rijnders
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.081

6.  Impact of Group vs. Individual Prenatal Care Provision on Women's Knowledge of Pregnancy-Related Topics: An Open, Controlled, Semi-Randomized Community Trial.

Authors:  Ronit Ratzon; Arnon Cohen; Amnon Hadar; Miron Froimovici; Natalya Bilenko
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 7.  A systematic overview of the literature regarding group prenatal care for high-risk pregnant women.

Authors:  Brittany M Byerley; David M Haas
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.007
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.