Literature DB >> 25101914

Discordant noninvasive prenatal testing and cytogenetic results: a study of 109 consecutive cases.

Jia-Chi Wang1, Trilochan Sahoo2, Steven Schonberg3, Kimberly A Kopita1, Leslie Ross1, Kyla Patek3, Charles M Strom1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent published studies have demonstrated the incremental value of the use of cell-free DNA for noninvasive prenatal testing with 100% sensitivity for trisomies 21 and 18 and a specificity of ≥99.7% for both. Data presented by two independent groups suggesting positive results by noninvasive prenatal testing were not confirmed by cytogenetic studies.
METHODS: Concordance of results among cases with noninvasive prenatal testing referred for cytogenetic prenatal and/or postnatal studies by karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and/or oligo-single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray was evaluated for 109 consecutive specimens.
RESULTS: Cytogenetic results were positive for trisomy 21 in 38 of the 41 noninvasive prenatal testing-positive cases (true-positive rate: 93%) and for trisomy 18 in 16 of the 25 noninvasive prenatal testing-positive cases (true-positive rate: 64%). The true-positive rate was only 44% (7/16 cases) for trisomy 13 and 38% (6/16 cases) for sex chromosome aneuploidy.
CONCLUSION: These findings raise concerns about the limitations of noninvasive prenatal testing and the need for analysis of a larger number of false-positive cases to provide true positive predictive values for noninvasive testing and to search for potential biological or technical causes. Our data suggest the need for a careful interpretation of noninvasive prenatal testing results and cautious transmission of the same to providers and patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25101914     DOI: 10.1038/gim.2014.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  2 in total

1.  DNA sequencing versus standard prenatal aneuploidy screening.

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi; R Lamar Parker; Jeffrey Wentworth; Rajeevi Madankumar; Craig Saffer; Anita F Das; Joseph A Craig; Darya I Chudova; Patricia L Devers; Keith W Jones; Kelly Oliver; Richard P Rava; Amy J Sehnert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Noninvasive prenatal testing: limitations and unanswered questions.

Authors:  Monica A Lutgendorf; Katie A Stoll; Dana M Knutzen; Lisa M Foglia
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 8.822

  2 in total
  33 in total

1.  Non-invasive prenatal testing for sex chromosome abnormalities: a source of confusion.

Authors:  Erkan Kalafat; Mehmet Murat Seval; Batuhan Turgay; Acar Koç
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-01-28

Review 2.  Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mylène Badeau; Carmen Lindsay; Jonatan Blais; Leon Nshimyumukiza; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sylvie Langlois; France Légaré; Yves Giguère; Alexis F Turgeon; William Witteman; François Rousseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-10

3.  Maternal iAMP21 acute lymphoblastic leukemia detected on prenatal cell-free DNA genetic screening.

Authors:  Marlise R Luskin; Marie N Discenza; Sarah Rae Easter; Paola Dal Cin; Renius Owen; Bernard Ilagan; Meredith Masiello; Andrew A Lane
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2017-08-15

Review 4.  Pre- and post-test genetic counseling for chromosomal and Mendelian disorders.

Authors:  Jill Fonda Allen; Katie Stoll; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.300

5.  Developing context-specific next-generation sequencing policy.

Authors:  Margaret Ann Curnutte; Karen L Frumovitz; Juli M Bollinger; Robert M Cook-Deegan; Amy L McGuire; Mary A Majumder
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Cell-free DNA screening in clinical practice: abnormal autosomal aneuploidy and microdeletion results.

Authors:  Stephanie G Valderramos; Rashmi R Rao; Emily W Scibetta; Neil S Silverman; Christina S Han; Lawrence D Platt
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results: a clinical laboratory practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  Athena M Cherry; Yassmine M Akkari; Kimberly M Barr; Hutton M Kearney; Nancy C Rose; Sarah T South; James H Tepperberg; Jeanne M Meck
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: use of cell-free fetal DNA in Down syndrome screening.

Authors:  Imran Rafi; Melissa Hill; Judith Hayward; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 9.  Noninvasive Prenatal Screening for Genetic Diseases Using Massively Parallel Sequencing of Maternal Plasma DNA.

Authors:  Lyn S Chitty; Y M Dennis Lo
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 6.915

10.  Expanding noninvasive prenatal testing to include microdeletions and segmental aneuploidy: cause for concern?

Authors:  Trilochan Sahoo; Karine Hovanes; Michelle N Strecker; Natasa Dzidic; Sara Commander; Mary K Travis
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.