Literature DB >> 25101610

Perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gijsbert D Musters1, Christianne J Buskens, Willem A Bemelman, Pieter J Tanis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impaired perineal wound healing has become a significant clinical problem after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. The increased use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy and wider excisions might have contributed to this problem.
OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to determine the impact of radiotherapy and an extralevator approach on perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. DATA SOURCES: In March 2014, electronic databases were searched. STUDY SELECTION AND
INTERVENTIONS: Studies describing any outcome measure on perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was overall perineal wound problems within 30 days after conventional or extralevator abdominoperineal resection with or without neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Secondary end points were primary wound healing, perineal hernia rate, and the effect of biological mesh closure on perineal wound problems.
RESULTS: A total of 32 studies were included. The pooled percentage of perineal wound problems after primary perineal wound closure in patients who did not undergo neoadjuvant radiotherapy was 15.3% (95% CI, 12.1-19.2) after conventional abdominoperineal resection and 14.8% (95% CI, 9.5-22.4) after extralevator abdominoperineal resection. After neoadjuvant radiotherapy, perineal wound problems occurred in 30.2% (95% CI, 19.2-44.0) after conventional abdominoperineal resection and in 37.6% (95% CI, 18.6-61.4) after extralevator abdominoperineal resection. Radiotherapy significantly increased perineal wound problems after abdominoperineal resection (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.45-3.40; p < 0.001). After biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor following extralevator abdominoperineal resection with neoadjuvant radiotherapy, the percentage of perineal wound problems was 7.3% (95% CI, 1.5-29.3). LIMITATIONS: Heterogeneity was high for some analyses.
CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy significantly increases perineal wound problems after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer, whereas the extralevator approach seems not to be of significant importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25101610     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  52 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of local gentamicin for prophylaxis of surgical site infections in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Yan-Fei Lv; Jian Wang; Feng Dong; Dian-Hui Yang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Composite mesh and gluteal fasciocutaneous rotation flap for perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal resection: a novel technique.

Authors:  Marios Papadakis; Gunnar Hübner; Marzena Bednarek; Mohamed Arafkas
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-03-07

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of biological mesh reconstruction versus primary perineal closure after abdominoperineal excision of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Nasir Zaheer Ahmad; Muhammad Hasan Abbas; Noof Mohammed A B Al-Naimi; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal excision or extralevator abdominoperineal excision: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  A Balla; G Batista Rodríguez; N Buonomo; C Martinez; P Hernández; J Bollo; E M Targarona
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Extended pelvic resection for rectal and anal canal tumors is a significant risk factor for perineal wound infection: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ken Imaizumi; Yuji Nishizawa; Koji Ikeda; Yuichiro Tsukada; Takeshi Sasaki; Masaaki Ito
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Preoperative FOLFOX in resectable locally advanced rectal cancer can be a safe and promising strategy: the R-NAC-01 study.

Authors:  Nobuki Ichikawa; Shigenori Homma; Tohru Funakoshi; Masahiro Hattori; Masanori Sato; You Kamiizumi; Kazuyoshi Omori; Masaru Nomura; Ryoichi Yokota; Masahiko Koike; Hirofumi Kon; Keisa Takeda; Hiroyuki Ishizu; Kunihiro Hirose; Daisuke Kuraya; Takahisa Ishikawa; Ryohei Murata; Hiroaki Iijima; Futoshi Kawamata; Tadashi Yoshida; Yosuke Ohno; Nozomi Minagawa; Norihiko Takahashi; Akinobu Taketomi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a two-centre experience in the era of intensified oncological treatment.

Authors:  Gijsbert D Musters; Didi A M Sloothaak; Sapho Roodbeen; Anna A W van Geloven; Willem A Bemelman; Pieter J Tanis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Differences in surgical site infection between laparoscopic colon and rectal surgeries: sub-analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (Japan-Multinational Trial Organization PREV 07-01).

Authors:  Saori Goto; Suguru Hasegawa; Hiroaki Hata; Takashi Yamaguchi; Koya Hida; Ryuta Nishitai; Satoshi Yamanokuchi; Akinari Nomura; Takeharu Yamanaka; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  [Plastic reconstruction of radiation injuries].

Authors:  P M Vogt; T R Mett; C Henkenberens; C Radtke; R Ipaktchi
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 10.  Advances and challenges in treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Joshua Smith; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.