Literature DB >> 25099802

A method to predict blood-brain barrier permeability of drug-like compounds using molecular dynamics simulations.

Timothy S Carpenter1, Daniel A Kirshner1, Edmond Y Lau1, Sergio E Wong1, Jerome P Nilmeier1, Felice C Lightstone2.   

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is formed by specialized tight junctions between endothelial cells that line brain capillaries to create a highly selective barrier between the brain and the rest of the body. A major problem to overcome in drug design is the ability of the compound in question to cross the BBB. Neuroactive drugs are required to cross the BBB to function. Conversely, drugs that target other parts of the body ideally should not cross the BBB to avoid possible psychotropic side effects. Thus, the task of predicting the BBB permeability of new compounds is of great importance. Two gold-standard experimental measures of BBB permeability are logBB (the concentration of drug in the brain divided by concentration in the blood) and logPS (permeability surface-area product). Both methods are time-consuming and expensive, and although logPS is considered the more informative measure, it is lower throughput and more resource intensive. With continual increases in computer power and improvements in molecular simulations, in silico methods may provide viable alternatives. Computational predictions of these two parameters for a sample of 12 small molecule compounds were performed. The potential of mean force for each compound through a 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine bilayer is determined by molecular dynamics simulations. This system setup is often used as a simple BBB mimetic. Additionally, one-dimensional position-dependent diffusion coefficients are calculated from the molecular dynamics trajectories. The diffusion coefficient is combined with the free energy landscape to calculate the effective permeability (Peff) for each sample compound. The relative values of these permeabilities are compared to experimentally determined logBB and logPS values. Our computational predictions correlate remarkably well with both logBB (R(2) = 0.94) and logPS (R(2) = 0.90). Thus, we have demonstrated that this approach may have the potential to provide reliable, quantitatively predictive BBB permeability, using a relatively quick, inexpensive method.
Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25099802      PMCID: PMC4129472          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  83 in total

1.  Insights for predicting blood-brain barrier penetration of CNS targeted molecules using QSPR approaches.

Authors:  Yi Fan; Rayomand Unwalla; Rajiah A Denny; Li Di; Edward H Kerns; David J Diller; Christine Humblet
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  The effect of temperature on the pH of blood and plasma in vitro.

Authors:  T B ROSENTHAL
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1948-03       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  QSAR modeling of the blood-brain barrier permeability for diverse organic compounds.

Authors:  Liying Zhang; Hao Zhu; Tudor I Oprea; Alexander Golbraikh; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Partitioning of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in lipid membranes: a molecular dynamics simulation study.

Authors:  Mohan Babu Boggara; Ramanan Krishnamoorti
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Diffusion of macromolecules in the brain: implications for drug delivery.

Authors:  Daniel J Wolak; Robert G Thorne
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Brain uptake of benzodiazepines: effects of lipophilicity and plasma protein binding.

Authors:  D R Jones; S D Hall; E K Jackson; R A Branch; G R Wilkinson
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Calculating diffusion and permeability coefficients with the oscillating forward-reverse method.

Authors:  Bryan W Holland; Chris G Gray; Bruno Tomberli
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2012-09-27

Review 8.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Coexistence of passive and proton antiporter-mediated processes in nicotine transport at the mouse blood-brain barrier.

Authors:  Salvatore Cisternino; Hélène Chapy; Pascal André; Maria Smirnova; Marcel Debray; Jean-Michel Scherrmann
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.009

10.  Evaluation of various PAMPA models to identify the most discriminating method for the prediction of BBB permeability.

Authors:  Jurgen Mensch; Anouche Melis; Claire Mackie; Geert Verreck; Marcus E Brewster; Patrick Augustijns
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 5.571

View more
  64 in total

Review 1.  Permeability of the Blood-Brain Barrier: Molecular Mechanism of Transport of Drugs and Physiologically Important Compounds.

Authors:  Clifford W Fong
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 1.843

Review 2.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Membrane Permeability.

Authors:  Richard M Venable; Andreas Krämer; Richard W Pastor
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Predict drug permeability to blood-brain-barrier from clinical phenotypes: drug side effects and drug indications.

Authors:  Zhen Gao; Yang Chen; Xiaoshu Cai; Rong Xu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Structural perturbation of a dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) bilayer by warfarin and its bolaamphiphilic analogue: A molecular dynamics study.

Authors:  Manuela Aseye Ayele Ayee; Charles William Roth; Belinda Sena Akpa
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 8.128

5.  Prediction of Membrane Permeation of Drug Molecules by Combining an Implicit Membrane Model with Machine Learning.

Authors:  Stephanie A Brocke; Alexandra Degen; Alexander D MacKerell; Bercem Dutagaci; Michael Feig
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Physics-Based Method for Modeling Passive Membrane Permeability and Translocation Pathways of Bioactive Molecules.

Authors:  Andrei L Lomize; Irina D Pogozheva
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 7.  Assessing drug response in engineered brain microenvironments.

Authors:  Kinsley M Tate; Jennifer M Munson
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Simulation-Based Approaches for Determining Membrane Permeability of Small Compounds.

Authors:  Christopher T Lee; Jeffrey Comer; Conner Herndon; Nelson Leung; Anna Pavlova; Robert V Swift; Chris Tung; Christopher N Rowley; Rommie E Amaro; Christophe Chipot; Yi Wang; James C Gumbart
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  In Silico design of AVP (4-5) peptide and synthesis, characterization and in vitro activity of chitosan nanoparticles.

Authors:  Serda Kecel-Gunduz; Yasemin Budama-Kilinc; Rabia Cakir-Koc; Tolga Zorlu; Bilge Bicak; Yagmur Kokcu; Aysen E Ozel; Sevim Akyuz
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Design and synthesis of novel tacrine-indole hybrids as potential multitarget-directed ligands for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Slavka Hamulakova; Zuzana Kudlickova; Ladislav Janovec; Roman Mezencev; Zachery J Deckner; Yury O Chernoff; Jana Janockova; Veronika Ihnatova; Petr Bzonek; Nikola Novakova; Vendula Hepnarova; Martina Hrabinova; Daniel Jun; Jan Korabecny; Ondrej Soukup; Kamil Kuca
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.