Literature DB >> 25099796

If cell mechanics can be described by elastic modulus: study of different models and probes used in indentation experiments.

Nataliia Guz1, Maxim Dokukin2, Vivekanand Kalaparthi3, Igor Sokolov4.   

Abstract

Here we investigated the question whether cells, being highly heterogeneous objects, could be described with the elastic modulus (effective Young's modulus) in a self-consistent way. We performed a comparative analysis of the elastic modulus derived from the indentation data obtained with atomic force microscopy (AFM) on human cervical epithelial cells (both normal and cancerous). Both sharp (cone) and dull (2500-nm radius sphere) AFM probes were used. The indentation data were processed through different elastic models. The cell was approximated as a homogeneous elastic medium that had either 1), smooth hemispherical boundary (Hertz/Sneddon models) or 2), the boundary covered with a layer of glycocalyx and membrane protrusions ("brush" models). Consistency of these approximations was investigated. Specifically, we tested the independence of the elastic modulus of the indentation depth, which is assumed in these models. We demonstrated that only one model showed consistency in treating cells as a homogeneous elastic medium, namely, the brush model, when processing the indentation data collected with the dull AFM probe. The elastic modulus demonstrated strong depth dependence in all models: Hertz/Sneddon models (no brush taken into account), and when the brush model was applied to the data collected with sharp conical probes. We conclude that it is possible to describe the elastic properties of the cell body by means of an effective elastic modulus, used in a self-consistent way, when using the brush model to analyze data collected with a dull AFM probe. The nature of these results is discussed.
Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25099796      PMCID: PMC4129501          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  41 in total

1.  Imaging living chondrocyte surface structures with AFM contact mode.

Authors:  Gerlinde Bischoff; Anke Bernstein; David Wohlrab; Hans-Joachim Hein
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2004

2.  Applicability of AFM in cancer detection.

Authors:  M Lekka; P Laidler
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Q S Li; G Y H Lee; C N Ong; C T Lim
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  The effect of the endothelial cell cortex on atomic force microscopy measurements.

Authors:  R Vargas-Pinto; H Gong; A Vahabikashi; M Johnson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Quantitative study of the elastic modulus of loosely attached cells in AFM indentation experiments.

Authors:  Maxim E Dokukin; Nataliia V Guz; Igor Sokolov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Quantitative mapping of the elastic modulus of soft materials with HarmoniX and PeakForce QNM AFM modes.

Authors:  Maxim E Dokukin; Igor Sokolov
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.882

7.  A biomarker that identifies senescent human cells in culture and in aging skin in vivo.

Authors:  G P Dimri; X Lee; G Basile; M Acosta; G Scott; C Roskelley; E E Medrano; M Linskens; I Rubelj; O Pereira-Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Abnormalities in the mechanical properties of red blood cells caused by Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  G B Nash; E O'Brien; E C Gordon-Smith; J A Dormandy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1989-08-01       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients.

Authors:  Sarah E Cross; Yu-Sheng Jin; Jianyu Rao; James K Gimzewski
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2007-12-02       Impact factor: 39.213

10.  Atomic force microscopy detects differences in the surface brush of normal and cancerous cells.

Authors:  S Iyer; R M Gaikwad; V Subba-Rao; C D Woodworth; Igor Sokolov
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 39.213

View more
  74 in total

1.  A Mechanistic Collective Cell Model for Epithelial Colony Growth and Contact Inhibition.

Authors:  Sebastian Aland; Haralambos Hatzikirou; John Lowengrub; Axel Voigt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Biophysical differences between chronic myelogenous leukemic quiescent and proliferating stem/progenitor cells.

Authors:  Nataliia V Guz; Sapan J Patel; Maxim E Dokukin; Bayard Clarkson; Igor Sokolov
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 5.307

3.  Effects of blocking integrin β1 and N-cadherin cellular interactions on mechanical properties of vascular smooth muscle cells.

Authors:  Aesha Desai; Sandra Geraghty; Delphine Dean
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Genome variation across cancers scales with tissue stiffness - an invasion-mutation mechanism and implications for immune cell infiltration.

Authors:  Charlotte R Pfeifer; Cory M Alvey; Jerome Irianto; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2017-04-27

5.  Quantifying the Local Mechanical Properties of Cells in a Fibrous Three-Dimensional Microenvironment.

Authors:  Amy Dagro; Labchan Rajbhandari; Santiago Orrego; Sung Hoon Kang; Arun Venkatesan; Kaliat T Ramesh
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Mechanical Heterogeneity in the Bone Microenvironment as Characterized by Atomic Force Microscopy.

Authors:  Xinyue Chen; Russell Hughes; Nic Mullin; Rhoda J Hawkins; Ingunn Holen; Nicola J Brown; Jamie K Hobbs
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Mitochondrial DNA 3243A>G heteroplasmy is associated with changes in cytoskeletal protein expression and cell mechanics.

Authors:  Judith Kandel; Martin Picard; Douglas C Wallace; David M Eckmann
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Determination of the Elastic Moduli of a Single Cell Cultured on a Rigid Support by Force Microscopy.

Authors:  Pablo D Garcia; Ricardo Garcia
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Ultrasound-based cell sorting with microbubbles: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Thomas J Matula; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Lev A Ostrovsky; Andrew A Brayman; John Kucewicz; Brian E MacConaghy; Dino De Raad
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Difference in biophysical properties of cancer-initiating cells in melanoma mutated zebrafish.

Authors:  N Makarova; Vivek Kalaparthi; Andrew Wang; Chris Williams; M E Dokukin; Charles K Kaufman; Leonard Zon; I Sokolov
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.