CONTEXT: Biomechanically, the motions used by baseball and softball pitchers differ greatly; however, the throwing motions of position players in both sports are strikingly similar. Although the adaptations to the dominant limb from overhead throwing have been well documented in baseball athletes, these adaptations have not been clearly identified in softball players. This information is important in order to develop and implement injury-prevention programs specific to decreasing the risk of upper extremity injury in softball athletes. OBJECTIVE: To compare range-of-motion and humeral-retrotorsion characteristics of collegiate baseball and softball position players and of baseball and softball players to sex-matched controls. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Research laboratories and athletic training rooms at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-three collegiate baseball players, 35 collegiate softball players, 25 male controls (nonoverhead athletes), and 19 female controls (nonoverhead athletes). INTERVENTION(S): Range of motion and humeral retrotorsion were measured using a digital inclinometer and diagnostic ultrasound. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Glenohumeral internal-rotation deficit, external-rotation gain, total glenohumeral range of motion, and humeral retrotorsion. RESULTS: Baseball players had greater glenohumeral internal-rotation deficit, total-range-of-motion, and humeral-retrotorsion difference than softball players and male controls. There were no differences between glenohumeral internal-rotation deficit, total-range-of-motion, and humeral-retrotorsion difference in softball players and female controls. CONCLUSIONS: Few differences were evident between softball players and female control participants, although range-of-motion and humeral-retrotorsion adaptations were significantly different than baseball players. The throwing motions are similar between softball and baseball, but the athletes adapt to the demands of the sport differently; thus, stretching/strengthening programs designed for baseball may not be the most effective programs for softball athletes.
CONTEXT: Biomechanically, the motions used by baseball and softball pitchers differ greatly; however, the throwing motions of position players in both sports are strikingly similar. Although the adaptations to the dominant limb from overhead throwing have been well documented in baseball athletes, these adaptations have not been clearly identified in softball players. This information is important in order to develop and implement injury-prevention programs specific to decreasing the risk of upper extremity injury in softball athletes. OBJECTIVE: To compare range-of-motion and humeral-retrotorsion characteristics of collegiate baseball and softball position players and of baseball and softball players to sex-matched controls. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Research laboratories and athletic training rooms at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-three collegiate baseball players, 35 collegiate softball players, 25 male controls (nonoverhead athletes), and 19 female controls (nonoverhead athletes). INTERVENTION(S): Range of motion and humeral retrotorsion were measured using a digital inclinometer and diagnostic ultrasound. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Glenohumeral internal-rotation deficit, external-rotation gain, total glenohumeral range of motion, and humeral retrotorsion. RESULTS: Baseball players had greater glenohumeral internal-rotation deficit, total-range-of-motion, and humeral-retrotorsion difference than softball players and male controls. There were no differences between glenohumeral internal-rotation deficit, total-range-of-motion, and humeral-retrotorsion difference in softball players and female controls. CONCLUSIONS: Few differences were evident between softball players and female control participants, although range-of-motion and humeral-retrotorsion adaptations were significantly different than baseball players. The throwing motions are similar between softball and baseball, but the athletes adapt to the demands of the sport differently; thus, stretching/strengthening programs designed for baseball may not be the most effective programs for softball athletes.
Authors: Sherry L Werner; John A Guido; Ryan P McNeice; Jasper L Richardson; Neil A Delude; Gregory W Stewart Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2005-02-08 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Joseph B Myers; Sakiko Oyama; Craig A Wassinger; Robert D Ricci; John P Abt; Kevin M Conley; Scott M Lephart Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2007-07-03 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Heber C Crockett; Lyndon B Gross; Kevin E Wilk; Martin L Schwartz; Jamie Reed; Jay O'Mara; Michael T Reilly; Jeffery R Dugas; Keith Meister; Stephen Lyman; James R Andrews Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: K M Reagan; Keith Meister; Mary Beth Horodyski; Dave W Werner; Cathy Carruthers; Kevin Wilk Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2002 May-Jun Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Joseph B Myers; Sakiko Oyama; Benjamin M Goerger; Terri Jo Rucinski; J Troy Blackburn; R Alexander Creighton Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 3.638
Authors: Elizabeth E Hibberd; Kevin Laudner; David J Berkoff; Kristen L Kucera; Bing Yu; Joseph B Myers Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Joshua K Helmkamp; Garrett S Bullock; Allison Rao; Ellen Shanley; Charles Thigpen; Grant E Garrigues Journal: Sports Health Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 3.843