Literature DB >> 25098194

The STarT Back Screening Tool for prediction of 6-month clinical outcomes: relevance of change patterns in outpatient physical therapy settings.

Jason M Beneciuk1, Julie M Fritz, Steven Z George.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Observational cohort.
OBJECTIVES: To describe changes in STarT Back Tool (SBT) categorization following 4 weeks of outpatient physical therapy and to evaluate predictive capabilities of SBT categorization when administered at multiple time points.
BACKGROUND: Initial assessment information is commonly used to predict long-term outcomes but does not account for changes that occur following initiation of treatment. Changes in SBT categorization during the course of treatment have potential to provide additional prognostic information that could positively impact management of low back pain.
METHODS: Patients (n = 123) receiving nonstandardized physical therapy care for low back pain were administered the SBT at intake and 4 weeks later to evaluate SBT changes, which were described as improved (SBT categorization changed from medium to low, high to low, or high to medium risk), stable (SBT categorization remained low or medium risk), or worsened (SBT categorization changed from low to medium, low to high, medium to high, or remained high risk). Clinical outcomes consisted of pain intensity and self-reported disability. Relative contributions of SBT categorization (at intake and 4 weeks) and SBT change patterns as predictors of 6-month clinical outcomes were assessed using separate multiple-regression models, while controlling for other prognostic variables.
RESULTS: Most patients (81.8%) initially categorized as SBT high risk were categorized differently by the SBT at 4 weeks. Eleven percent of patients were described as worsened, based on SBT-category change patterns at 4 weeks. Prediction of 6-month disability scores was improved when considering intake, 4-week, or 4-week change for SBT categorization, with SBT high risk consistently providing unique contributions.
CONCLUSION: Repeated SBT assessment during the episode of physical therapy has potential to provide additional information for prediction of disability at 6 months. Future studies should investigate optimal management strategies for patients who have worsened SBT risk following physical therapy intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis, level 2b.

Entities:  

Keywords:  low back pain; prognosis; treatment monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25098194     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2014.5178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  19 in total

1.  Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome (OSPRO) for Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions: Results From the Validation Cohort.

Authors:  Steven Z George; Jason M Beneciuk; Trevor A Lentz; Samuel S Wu; Yunfeng Dai; Joel E Bialosky; Giorgio Zeppieri
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 2.  Artificial intelligence to improve back pain outcomes and lessons learnt from clinical classification approaches: three systematic reviews.

Authors:  Scott D Tagliaferri; Maia Angelova; Xiaohui Zhao; Patrick J Owen; Clint T Miller; Tim Wilkin; Daniel L Belavy
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-07-09

3.  The use of STarT BACK Screening Tool in emergency departments for patients with acute low back pain: a prospective inception cohort study.

Authors:  Flávia Cordeiro Medeiros; Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa; Indiara Soares Oliveira; Renan Kendy Oshima; Lucíola Cunha Menezes Costa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Treatment monitoring as a component of psychologically informed physical therapy: A case series of patients at high risk for persistent low back pain related disability.

Authors:  Jason M Beneciuk; Lindsay A Ballengee; Steven Z George
Journal:  Musculoskelet Sci Pract       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 2.520

5.  Low Risk for Persistent Back Pain Disability Is Characterized by Lower Pain Sensitivity and Higher Physical Performance.

Authors:  Katie A Butera; Emily J Fox; Mark D Bishop; Stephen A Coombes; Jason M Beneciuk; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2022-03-01

6.  Psychometric Evaluation of the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) Tool: Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity.

Authors:  Katie A Butera; Steven Z George; Trevor A Lentz
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.820

7.  Use of the STarT Back Screening Tool in patients with chronic low back pain receiving physical therapy interventions.

Authors:  Flávia Cordeiro Medeiros; Evelyn Cassia Salomão; Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa; Diego Galace de Freitas; Thiago Yukio Fukuda; Renan Lima Monteiro; Marco Aurélio Nemitalla Added; Alessandra Narciso Garcia; Lucíola da Cunha Menezes Costa
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Preliminary Evaluation of a Modified STarT Back Screening Tool Across Different Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions.

Authors:  Katie A Butera; Trevor A Lentz; Jason M Beneciuk; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2016-02-04

9.  The use of STarT back screening tool to predict functional disability outcomes in patients receiving physical therapy for low back pain.

Authors:  Irene L Katzan; Nicolas R Thompson; Steven Z George; Sandi Passek; Frederick Frost; Mary Stilphen
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Validation of the German version of the STarT-Back Tool (STarT-G): a cohort study with patients from primary care practices.

Authors:  Sven Karstens; Katja Krug; Jonathan C Hill; Christian Stock; Jost Steinhaeuser; Joachim Szecsenyi; Stefanie Joos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.