| Literature DB >> 25097531 |
Tanveer Hussain Shah1, Mukhtiar Hassan2, Tahir Saeed Siddiqui3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The study on sub clinical rickets is unique in the sense that it has not been preplanned conducted anywhere especially in Pakistan. The objective of present study was to explore the prevalence, gender and geographical distribution of sub clinical rickets and their related factors among school students.Entities:
Keywords: Camouflagic rickets; Daily meals; Hazarian school students; Physical indications; Sub clinical; Synergistic effect
Year: 2014 PMID: 25097531 PMCID: PMC4121712
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pak J Med Sci ISSN: 1681-715X Impact factor: 1.088
Geographical and gender wise data of study participants.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Rural | 34(35.42) | 13.69±1.69 | 33(35.48) | 13.96±1.54 | >0.05 |
| Urban | 30(31.25) | 13.93±1.64 | 30(32.26) | 13.75±1.42 | >0.05 |
| Suburban | 32(33.33) | 13.87±1.47 | 3032.26) | 13.54±1.40 | >0.05 |
| Total | 96 | 13.83±1.58 | 93 | 13.76±1.45 | >0.05 |
| P value | >0.05 | >0.05 | |||
Comparison of nutritional intakes by normal and sub clinical cases of different gender and groups
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Rural(Normal) | 29.48±3.14 | 30.64±4.22 | 268.9±25.9 | 290.1±34.6 | 335.4±26.0 | 327.9±30.1 |
| Rural(Sub clinical) | 26.86±2.67 | 27.95±3.08 | 247.3±22.5 | 267.2±27.4 | 305.7±31.7 | 310.6±23.7 |
| P value | 0.050 | 0.055 | 0.053 | 0.051 | 0.052 | 0.088 |
| Urban (Normal) | 30.48±3.55 | 29.05±3.44 | 289.7±21.7 | 291.1±29.8 | 334.3±20.1 | 315.9±43.5 |
| Urban (Sub clinical) | 28.4±1.52 | 27.27± 1.19 | 251.8±30.7 | 268.5±28.3 | 296±29.50 | 297±14.6 |
| P value | 0.052 | 0.051 | 0.058 | 0.052 | 0.050 | 0.095 |
| Suburban (Normal) | 30.34±3.46 | 30.79±1.98 | 308.9±18.8 | 296±16.9 | 348.7±14.4 | 323.5±16.7 |
| Suburban (Sub clinical) | 27.67±1.53 | 28.33±2.42 | 241.7±29.3 | 265.8±28.4 | 297.3±23.7 | 300.8±21.1 |
| P value | 0.070 | 0.061 | 0.060 | 0.054 | 0.066 | 0.050 |
Significant difference (<0.05), Non significant difference (>0.05)
Comparison of serum biochemical parameters in normal and sub clinical cases of different gender and groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Rural | 67.06 | 59.57 | 8.87 | 8.98 | 3.40 | 3.50 | 407.8 | 470 | 39.89 | 49.3 |
| Rural | 27 | 23.42 | 8.52 | 8.47 | 3.51 | 3.30 | 608 | 612.3 | 48.71 | 58.68 |
| P value | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0008 | 0.0000 | 0.33 | 0.13 | 0.0023 | 0.0001 | 0.054 | 0.050 |
| Urban | 67.96 | 61.58 | 9.18 | 8.96 | 3.60 | 3.50 | 326.8 | 343.4 | 35.48 | 45.05 |
| Urban | 33.4 | 28.91 | 8.58 | 8.57 | 3.50 | 3.40 | 611 | 568 | 47.80 | 52.4 |
| P value | 0.0000 | 0.000 | 0.0000 | 0.0002 | 0.48 | 0.55 | 0.0062 | 0.0001 | 0.050 | 0.050 |
| Suburban | 69.21 | 63.13 | 9.1 | 9.10 | 3.65 | 3.40 | 338.1 | 397.5 | 29.76 | 39.17 |
| Suburban | 38.33 | 33.50 | 8.6 | 8.71 | 3.43 | 3.49 | 569 | 535 | 46.67 | 50.7 |
| P value | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.064 | 0.058 | 0.42 | 0.64 | 0.11 | 0.052 | 0.051 | 0.051 |
ALP: Alkaline Phosphatase, PTH: Parathyroid hormone, Significant difference (<0.05), Non significant difference (>0.05)