Literature DB >> 2509747

An analysis of time delays preceding thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction.

S W Sharkey1, D D Bruneete, E Ruiz, W T Hession, D G Wysham, I F Goldenberg, M Hodges.   

Abstract

For a patient to derive maximal benefit from intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction, early treatment is essential. As part of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction II trial, this study investigated the time delays that preceded treatment of 236 consecutive patients with intravenous tissue-plasminogen activator (TPA) during acute myocardial infarction. The average (+/- SD) time from the onset of symptoms to treatment with TPA was 153 +/- 54 minutes. After arrival in the emergency department, patients waited an average of 19.9 +/- 17.8 minutes for the initial electrocardiogram. Following the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction by electrocardiogram, an additional 70 +/- 40 minutes elapsed before thrombolytic therapy began. The interval between the initial electrocardiogram and initiation of treatment with TPA was less when the drug was first administered in the emergency department (46.8 +/- 23.4 minutes) rather than after transfer to the coronary care unit (82.1 +/- 34.7 minutes). In-hospital delays at the two academic and two private hospitals accounted for more than half of the total time from the onset of symptoms to initiation of thrombolytic therapy. We conclude that significant in-hospital delays are likely to occur before a patient receives thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Various factors conspire to create these delays, but a well-organized team approach to treatment will help to minimize delays in the implementation of this new form of therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2509747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  24 in total

1.  Time to Reperfusion: The Critical Modulator in Thrombolysis and Primary Angioplasty.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Thrombolytic therapy in A&E departments in the U.K.

Authors:  A Banerjee
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1992-06

3.  "Fast track" admission for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  N Haslam; M Doyle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-08

Review 4.  Guidelines to reducing delays in administration of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  W L Williams
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Setting up a heart emergency centre.

Authors:  S J Virk; E Edmunds; R A Perry
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Reasonable "door-to-needle" time for thrombolytic therapy.

Authors:  A F Grunfeld
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Changing the site of delivery of thrombolytic treatment for acute myocardial infarction from the coronary care unit to the emergency department greatly reduces door to needle time.

Authors:  C T Hourigan; D Mountain; P E Langton; I G Jacobs; I R Rogers; G A Jelinek; P L Thompson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Prognostic implications of ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction: new strategies required for further mortality reduction.

Authors:  J W Sayer; R A Archbold; P Wilkinson; S Ray; K Ranjadayalan; A D Timmis
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 9.  Delay between onset of chest pain and arrival to the coronary care unit among minority and disadvantaged patients.

Authors:  J K Ghali; R S Cooper; I Kowatly; Y Liao
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.798

10.  Time delays in provision of thrombolytic treatment in six district hospitals. Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and a Cardiology Committee of Royal College of Physicians of London.

Authors:  J S Birkhead
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.