| Literature DB >> 25096363 |
Nicole Geberzahn, Thierry Aubin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vocal performance refers to the ability to produce vocal signals close to physical limits. Such motor skills can be used by conspecifics to assess a signaller's competitive potential. For example it is difficult for birds to produce repeated syllables both rapidly and with a broad frequency bandwidth. Deviation from an upper-bound regression of frequency bandwidth on trill rate has been widely used to assess vocal performance. This approach is, however, only applicable to simple trilled songs, and even then may be affected by differences in syllable complexity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25096363 PMCID: PMC4243327 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-014-0058-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biol ISSN: 1741-7007 Impact factor: 7.431
Figure 1Spectrograms of subsequent syllables produced by a male skylark in response to a territorial playback. (A,B) Examples with small gaps. (C,D) Examples with large gaps. Red stars indicate peak frequency of the end of the first syllable and the start of the subsequent syllable. Inter-syllable frequency ratio was calculated by dividing the larger peak frequency (vertical bar ‘F’) by the smaller one (vertical bar ‘f’). The horizontal bar indicates gap duration.
Figure 2Gap duration plotted against inter-syllable frequency ratio. Blue line: lower-bound regression line. Red diamonds: syllables produced in response to territorial playbacks. Black triangles: syllables produced in spontaneous song (both contexts together n = 6,910 syllables of 16 subjects). Blue crosses: data points used to calculate the lower-bound regression line assessed by the equal samples per bin method [40]. Vocal gap deviation is measured as the minimum orthogonal distance of each data point to the lower-bound regression line; an example is shown for one data point (black dotted line). Minimum area convex polygon is given in red for reactive and in grey for spontaneous singing. For statistics see text.
No relationship between syllable duration and inter-syllable frequency ratios
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | -0.08 | 0.35 | -0.16 |
|
| 2 | -0.06 | 0.52 | -0.14 | 0.10 |
| 3 | 0.07 | 0.60 | 0.15 | 0.09 |
| 4 | -0.10 | 0.32 | -0.10 | 0.29 |
| 5 | 0.20 |
| 0.09 | 0.18 |
| 6 | -0.02 | 0.82 | -0.14 | 0.13 |
| 7 | -0.01 | 0.93 | 0.01 | 0.91 |
| 8 | -0.17 | 0.11 | -0.05 | 0.56 |
| 9 | -0.13 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 0.54 |
| 10 | -0.09 | 0.33 | -0.19 | 0.08 |
| 11 | -0.001 | 0.99 | 0.08 | 0.42 |
| 12 | 0.03 | 0.70 | 0.14 | 0.16 |
| 13 | -0.08 | 0.51 | 0.003 | 0.98 |
| 14 | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.35 |
| 15 | -0.06 | 0.56 | -0.04 | 0.63 |
| 16 | -0.11 | 0.24 | -0.15 | 0.10 |
Spearman’s rank rho is given for correlations between syllable duration and inter-syllable frequency ratios of each of the 16 subjects in spontaneous and reactive singing. Tests are based on mean values per syllable type. Significant P-values are given in bold.
Figure 3Vocal gap deviation was smaller when skylarks were singing in response to a territorial playback. This indicates that they were singing closer to their performance limit when challenged than when singing spontaneously. Average values of all syllable types are shown for each of 16 subjects. For statistics see text.