Literature DB >> 25096312

What is the best time point to identify patients at risk of developing persistent low back pain?

Markus Melloh1, Achim Elfering2, Anja Käser2, Cornelia Rolli Salathé2, Rebecca J Crawford3, Thomas Barz4, Thomas Zweig5, Emin Aghayev5, Christoph Röder5, Jean-Claude Theis6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early identification of patients at risk of developing persistent low back pain (LBP) is crucial.
OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study was to identify in patients with a new episode of LBP the time point at which those at risk of developing persistent LBP can be best identified.
METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 315 patients presenting to a health practitioner with a first episode of acute LBP. Primary outcome measure was functional limitation. Patients were assessed at baseline, three, six, twelve weeks and six months looking at factors of maladaptive cognition as potential predictors. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed for all time points.
RESULTS: The best time point to predict the development of persistent LBP at six months was the twelve-week follow-up (sensitivity 78%; overall predictive value 90%). Cognitions assessed at first visit to a health practitioner were not predictive.
CONCLUSIONS: Maladaptive cognitions at twelve weeks appear to be suitable predictors for a transition from acute to persistent LBP. Already three weeks after patients present to a health practitioner with acute LBP cognitions might influence the development of persistent LBP. Therefore, cognitive-behavioral interventions should be considered as early adjuvant LBP treatment in patients at risk of developing persistent LBP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prospective cohort study; maladaptive cognitions; persistent low back pain; predictors; prognosis; risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25096312     DOI: 10.3233/BMR-140514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-8127            Impact factor:   1.398


  6 in total

1.  Does injury claim status and benefit status predict low back pain outcomes?

Authors:  Markus Melloh; Jon Cornwall; Rebecca J Crawford; Achim Elfering
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2015-08-31

2.  Significant Efficacy of Tramadol/Acetaminophen in Elderly Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Uncontrolled by NSAIDs: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Toshihiro Imamura
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2015-05-15

3.  Describing the characteristics, treatment pathways, outcomes, and costs of people with persistent noncancer pain managed by community pain clinics and generating an indicative estimate of cost-effectiveness: feasibility study protocol.

Authors:  Shiekha AlAujan; Saja AlMazrou; Roger D Knaggs; Rachel A Elliott
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2016-05-18

4.  Does the performance of five back-associated exercises relate to the presence of low back pain? A cross-sectional observational investigation in regional Australian council workers.

Authors:  Charles Philip Gabel; Hamid Reza Mokhtarinia; Jonathan Hoffman; Jason Osborne; E-Liisa Laakso; Markus Melloh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Can the STarT Back Tool predict health-related quality of life and work ability after an acute/subacute episode with back or neck pain? A psychometric validation study in primary care.

Authors:  Malin H Forsbrand; Birgitta Grahn; Jonathan C Hill; Ingemar F Petersson; Charlotte Post Sennehed; Kjerstin Stigmar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Prediction and trend of tactile acuity, pain and disability in acute LBP: a six-month prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Rita Morf; Fabian Pfeiffer; Sabina Hotz-Boendermaker; André Meichtry; Hannu Luomajoki
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.