Literature DB >> 25095758

Viability, growth kinetics and stem cell markers of single and clustered cells in human intervertebral discs: implications for regenerative therapies.

Sarah Turner1, Birender Balain, Bruce Caterson, Clare Morgan, Sally Roberts.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is much interest in the development of a cellular therapy for the repair or regeneration of degenerate intervertebral discs (IVDs) utilising autologous cells, with some trials already underway. Clusters of cells are commonly found in degenerate IVDs and are formed via cell proliferation, possibly as a repair response. We investigated whether these clusters may be more suitable as a source of cells for biological repair than the single cells in the IVD.
METHODS: Discs were obtained at surgery from 95 patients and used to assess the cell viability, growth kinetics and stem or progenitor cell markers in both the single and clustered cell populations.
RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent (±15) of cells in disc tissue were viable. The clustered cell population consistently proliferated more slowly in monolayer than single cells, although this difference was only significant at P0-1 and P3-4. Both populations exhibited progenitor or notochordal cell markers [chondroitin sulphate epitopes (3B3(-), 7D4, 4C3 and 6C3), Notch-1, cytokeratin 8 and 19] via immunohistochemical examination; stem cell markers assessed with flow cytometry (CD73, 90 and 105 positivity) were similar to those seen on bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells.
CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm those of previous studies indicating that progenitor or stem cells reside in adult human intervertebral discs. However, although the cell clusters have arisen via proliferation, there appear to be no greater incidence of these progenitor cells within clusters compared to single cells. Rather, since they proliferate more slowly in vitro than the single cell population, it may be beneficial to avoid the use of clustered cells when sourcing autologous cells for regenerative therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25095758     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3500-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  54 in total

1.  Microscopic methods for the analysis of engineered tissues.

Authors:  Sally Roberts; Janis Menage
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2004

2.  Differentiation of intervertebral notochordal cells through live automated cell imaging system in vitro.

Authors:  Joo Han Kim; Bridget M Deasy; Hyoung Yeon Seo; Rebecca K Studer; Nam V Vo; Helga I Georgescu; Gwendolyn A Sowa; James D Kang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Disc cell therapies: critical issues.

Authors:  Marta Tibiletti; Nevenka Kregar Velikonja; Jill P G Urban; Jeremy C T Fairbank
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Senescence in human intervertebral discs.

Authors:  S Roberts; E H Evans; D Kletsas; D C Jaffray; S M Eisenstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A biomarker that identifies senescent human cells in culture and in aging skin in vivo.

Authors:  G P Dimri; X Lee; G Basile; M Acosta; G Scott; C Roskelley; E E Medrano; M Linskens; I Rubelj; O Pereira-Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Analysis of cell death and vertebral end plate bone mineral density in the annulus of the aging sand rat.

Authors:  Helen E Gruber; Brian Gordon; H James Norton; Jeremy Kilburn; Cliff Williams; Natalia Zinchenko; Jessica Heath; Jane Ingram; Edward N Hanley
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Clonal chondroprogenitors maintain telomerase activity and Sox9 expression during extended monolayer culture and retain chondrogenic potential.

Authors:  I M Khan; J C Bishop; S Gilbert; C W Archer
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Aging and degeneration in the lumbar intervertebral disc.

Authors:  K P Pritzker
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Chondroitin sulphate sulphation motif expression in the ontogeny of the intervertebral disc.

Authors:  A J Hayes; C E Hughes; J R Ralphs; B Caterson
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.942

Review 10.  Role of CD14 in host protection against infections and in metabolism regulation.

Authors:  Ivan Zanoni; Francesca Granucci
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 5.293

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Stem cell therapy for intervertebral disc regeneration: obstacles and solutions.

Authors:  Daisuke Sakai; Gunnar B J Andersson
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  Distinguishing characteristics of stem cells derived from different anatomical regions of human degenerated intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Hai Wang; Yue Zhou; Tong-Wei Chu; Chang-Qing Li; Jian Wang; Zheng-Feng Zhang; Bo Huang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Is Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Nucleus Pulposus Cells a Possibility for Biological Spinal Fusion?

Authors:  Sharon J Brown; Sarah A Turner; Birender S Balain; Neil T Davidson; Sally Roberts
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Spatiotemporal Expression of 3-B-3(-) and 7-D-4 Chondroitin Sulfation, Tissue Remodeling, and Attempted Repair in an Ovine Model of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.

Authors:  Brooke Farrugia; Susan M Smith; Cindy C Shu; James Melrose
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Current Treatment Options for Intervertebral Disc Pathologies.

Authors:  Stephen M Eisenstein; Birender Balain; Sally Roberts
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 6.  Notochordal Cell-Based Treatment Strategies and Their Potential in Intervertebral Disc Regeneration.

Authors:  Frances C Bach; Deepani W Poramba-Liyanage; Frank M Riemers; Jerome Guicheux; Anne Camus; James C Iatridis; Danny Chan; Keita Ito; Christine L Le Maitre; Marianna A Tryfonidou
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-03-14

Review 7.  IVD progenitor cells: a new horizon for understanding disc homeostasis and repair.

Authors:  Feng-Juan Lyu; Kenneth M Cheung; Zhaomin Zheng; Hua Wang; Daisuke Sakai; Victor Y Leung
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 20.543

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.