Literature DB >> 24509721

Disc cell therapies: critical issues.

Marta Tibiletti1, Nevenka Kregar Velikonja, Jill P G Urban, Jeremy C T Fairbank.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disc cell therapies, in which cells are injected into the degenerate disc in order to regenerate the matrix and restore function, appear to be an attractive, minimally invasive method of treatment. Interest in this area has stimulated research into disc cell biology in particular. However, other important issues, some of which are discussed here, need to be considered if cell-based therapies are to be brought to the clinic.
PURPOSE: Firstly, a question which is barely addressed in the literature, is how to identify patients with 'degenerative disc disease' who would benefit from cell therapy. Pain not disc degeneration is the symptom which drives patients to the clinic. Even though there are associations between back pain and disc degeneration, many people with even severely degenerate discs, with herniated discs or with spinal stenosis, are pain-free. It is not possible using currently available techniques to identify whether disc repair or regeneration would remove symptoms or prevent symptoms from occurring in future. Moreover, the repair process in human discs is very slow (years) because of the low cell density which can be supported nutritionally even in healthy human discs. If repair is necessary for relief of symptoms, questions regarding quality of life and rehabilitation during this long process need consideration. Also, some serious technical issues remain. Finding appropriate cell sources and scaffolds have received most attention, but these are not the only issues determining the feasibility of the procedure. There are questions regarding the safety of implanting cells by injection through the annulus whether the nutrient supply to the disc is sufficient to support implanted cells and whether, if cells are able to survive, conditions in a degenerate human disc will allow them to repair the damaged tissue.
CONCLUSIONS: If cell therapy for treatment of disc-related disorders is to enter the clinic as a routine treatment, investigations must examine the questions related to patient selection and the feasibility of achieving the desired repair in an acceptable time frame. Few diagnostic tests that examine whether cell therapies are likely to succeed are available at present, but definite exclusion criteria would be evidence of major disc fissures, or disturbance of nutrient pathways as measured by post-contrast MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24509721     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3177-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  143 in total

1.  Investigation of different cell types and gel carriers for cell-based intervertebral disc therapy, in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  H B Henriksson; M Hagman; M Horn; A Lindahl; H Brisby
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.963

2.  Association of lumbar artery narrowing, degenerative changes in disc and endplate and apparent diffusion in disc on postcontrast enhancement of lumbar intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Jaakko Niinimäki; Arto Korkiakoski; Outi Parviainen; Marianne Haapea; Mari Kuisma; Risto O Ojala; Jaro Karppinen; Raija Korpelainen; Osmo Tervonen; Miika T Nieminen
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation.

Authors:  S D Boden; D O Davis; T S Dina; N J Patronas; S W Wiesel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Prospective study of disc repair with allogeneic chondrocytes presented at the 2012 Joint Spine Section Meeting.

Authors:  Domagoj Coric; Kenneth Pettine; Andrew Sumich; Margaret O Boltes
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-11-09

5.  A needle micro-osmometer for determination of glycosaminoglycan concentration in excised nucleus pulposus tissue.

Authors:  Sarit Sara Sivan; Yulia Merkher; Ellen Wachtel; Jill P G Urban; Aron Lazary; Alice Maroudas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Pharmacological enhancement of disc diffusion and differentiation of healthy, ageing and degenerated discs : Results from in-vivo serial post-contrast MRI studies in 365 human lumbar discs.

Authors:  S Rajasekaran; K Venkatadass; J Naresh Babu; K Ganesh; Ajoy P Shetty
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Identification of cell proliferation zones, progenitor cells and a potential stem cell niche in the intervertebral disc region: a study in four species.

Authors:  Helena Henriksson; Maria Thornemo; Camilla Karlsson; Olle Hägg; Katarina Junevik; Anders Lindahl; Helena Brisby
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Tissue-engineering approach to regenerating the intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Damien M O'Halloran; Abhay S Pandit
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2007-08

Review 9.  Osteoarthritis year in review: outcome of rehabilitation.

Authors:  A M Davis; C MacKay
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Identification of novel nucleus pulposus markers: Interspecies variations and implications for cell-based therapiesfor intervertebral disc degeneration.

Authors:  R Rodrigues-Pinto; S M Richardson; J A Hoyland
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 5.853

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Stem cell therapy for intervertebral disc regeneration: obstacles and solutions.

Authors:  Daisuke Sakai; Gunnar B J Andersson
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 2.  The cartilage matrisome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Carol A Wise; Diane Sepich; Aki Ushiki; Anas M Khanshour; Yared H Kidane; Nadja Makki; Christina A Gurnett; Ryan S Gray; Jonathan J Rios; Nadav Ahituv; Lila Solnica-Krezel
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 13.567

3.  Viability, growth kinetics and stem cell markers of single and clustered cells in human intervertebral discs: implications for regenerative therapies.

Authors:  Sarah Turner; Birender Balain; Bruce Caterson; Clare Morgan; Sally Roberts
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Quantitative MRI in early intervertebral disc degeneration: T1rho correlates better than T2 and ADC with biomechanics, histology and matrix content.

Authors:  Cornelis P L Paul; Theodoor H Smit; Magda de Graaf; Roderick M Holewijn; Arno Bisschop; Peter M van de Ven; Margriet G Mullender; Marco N Helder; Gustav J Strijkers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Biological challenges for regeneration of the degenerated disc using cellular therapies.

Authors:  Michael Bendtsen; Cody Bunger; Pauline Colombier; Catherine Le Visage; Sally Roberts; Daisuke Sakai; Jill P G Urban
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 6.  The cartilage matrisome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Carol A Wise; Diane Sepich; Aki Ushiki; Anas M Khanshour; Yared H Kidane; Nadja Makki; Christina A Gurnett; Ryan S Gray; Jonathan J Rios; Nadav Ahituv; Lila Solnica-Krezel
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 13.567

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.