Literature DB >> 25094050

Identifying viable regulatory and innovation pathways for regenerative medicine: a case study of cultured red blood cells.

J Mittra1, J Tait2, M Mastroeni2, M L Turner3, J C Mountford4, K Bruce5.   

Abstract

The creation of red blood cells for the blood transfusion markets represents a highly innovative application of regenerative medicine with a medium term (5-10 year) prospect for first clinical studies. This article describes a case study analysis of a project to derive red blood cells from human embryonic stem cells, including the systemic challenges arising from (i) the selection of appropriate and viable regulatory protocols and (ii) technological constraints related to stem cell manufacture and scale up to clinical Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standard. The method used for case study analysis (Analysis of Life Science Innovation Systems (ALSIS)) is also innovative, demonstrating a new approach to social and natural science collaboration to foresight product development pathways. Issues arising along the development pathway include cell manufacture and scale-up challenges, affected by regulatory demands emerging from the innovation ecosystem (preclinical testing and clinical trials). Our discussion reflects on the efforts being made by regulators to adapt the current pharmaceuticals-based regulatory model to an allogeneic regenerative medicine product and the broader lessons from this case study for successful innovation and translation of regenerative medicine therapies, including the role of methodological and regulatory innovation in future development in the field.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25094050     DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2014.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Biotechnol        ISSN: 1871-6784            Impact factor:   5.079


  7 in total

1.  Effect of "old" versus "fresh" transfused red blood cells on patients' outcome: probably more complex than appears.

Authors:  Olivier Garraud
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Hematopoietic stem cells meet induced pluripotent stem cells technology.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Esposito
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 3.  Stem cell manipulation, gene therapy and the risk of cancer stem cell emergence.

Authors:  Flora Clément; Elodie Grockowiak; Florence Zylbersztejn; Gaëlle Fossard; Stéphanie Gobert; Véronique Maguer-Satta
Journal:  Stem Cell Investig       Date:  2017-07-25

4.  The European Hematology Association Roadmap for European Hematology Research: a consensus document.

Authors:  Andreas Engert; Carlo Balduini; Anneke Brand; Bertrand Coiffier; Catherine Cordonnier; Hartmut Döhner; Thom Duyvené de Wit; Sabine Eichinger; Willem Fibbe; Tony Green; Fleur de Haas; Achille Iolascon; Thierry Jaffredo; Francesco Rodeghiero; Gilles Salles; Jan Jacob Schuringa
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  3D bioprint me: a socioethical view of bioprinting human organs and tissues.

Authors:  Niki Vermeulen; Gill Haddow; Tirion Seymour; Alan Faulkner-Jones; Wenmiao Shu
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Blood-Borne Pathogens: A Canadian Blood Services Centre for Innovation Symposium.

Authors:  Geraldine M Walsh; Andrew W Shih; Ziad Solh; Mia Golder; Peter Schubert; Margaret Fearon; William P Sheffield
Journal:  Transfus Med Rev       Date:  2016-02-23

7.  Blood, meat, and upscaling tissue engineering: Promises, anticipated markets, and performativity in the biomedical and agri-food sectors.

Authors:  Neil Stephens; Emma King; Catherine Lyall
Journal:  Biosocieties       Date:  2018-01-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.