| Literature DB >> 25093176 |
Hongguo Li1, Rui Zhu2, Liguo Sun3, Yingsen Xue3, Zhangying Hao4, Zhenghong Xie3, Xiangli Fan3, Hongbin Fan3.
Abstract
Hydroxyapatite (HA) can be coated on various materials surface and has the function of osteogenicity. Microporous silk scaffold has excellent biocompatibility. In this study, alternate soaking technology was used to coat HA on microporous silk scaffolds. However, the cell proliferation was found to decrease with the increasing thickness (cycles of soaking) of HA-coating. This study aims to determine the best thickness (cycles of soaking) of HA-coating on microporous silk scaffolds. The SEM observation showed that group with one cycle of alternate soaking (1C-HA) has the most optimal porosity like non-HA-modified microporous silk scaffolds. The proliferation of osteoblasts has no significant difference between noncoated HA (N-HA) and 1C-HA groups, which are both significantly higher than those in two cycles of soaking (2C-HA) and three cycles of soaking (3C-HA) groups. The transcription levels of specific genes (runx2 and osteonectin) in osteoblasts of 1C-HA group were significantly higher than those of N-HA group. Moreover, the levels showed no significant difference among 1C-HA, 2C-HA, and 3C-HA groups. In conclusion, microporous silk scaffold with 1 cycle of HA-coating can combine the biocompatibility of silk and osteogenicity of HA.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25093176 PMCID: PMC4100396 DOI: 10.1155/2014/637821
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Schematic outline of scaffold fabrication procedure and experimental process.
Primer sequences for the real-time RT-PCR.
| Primer | Sequences |
|---|---|
|
| F: GAC ATC AAG AAG GTG GTG AAG C |
| R: CTT CAC AAA GTG GTC ATT GAG G | |
|
| |
|
| F: CCT TCC ACT CTC AGT AAG AAG A |
| R: TAA GTA AAG GTG GCT GGA TAG T | |
|
| |
|
| F: GAA GTT GAG GAA ACC GAA GA |
| R: GGC AGG AGG AGT CGA AG | |
Figure 2(a) Cell proliferation rate of N-HA, 1C-HA, 2C-HA, and 3C-HA groups during a 3-week culture period. (b) DNA content of osteoblasts on scaffolds of each group after 2 weeks postculturing. (c) Quantification of collagen production on scaffolds of each group after 2 weeks postculturing. (d) Quantification of collagen normalized by DNA amount on scaffolds of each group after 2 weeks postculturing. (*P < 0.05, ANOVA).
Figure 3(a)–(d) Macroscopic view of scaffolds in N-HA, 1C-HA, 2C-HA, and 3C-HA groups. (e)–(h) SEM observation of the surface of scaffolds in N-HA, 1C-HA, 2C-HA, and 3C-HA groups.
Figure 4(a)–(d) Morphology and proliferation of cells in four groups observed by SEM after 3-week culture. (e)–(h) Magnified view of rectangle area in (a)–(d). (i)–(l) Cell survival and proliferation observed by confocal laser scanning.
Figure 5Expression of osteoblast related gene markers after three weeks of culture (*P < 0.05, ANOVA).