Literature DB >> 25091262

Flexibility of thoracic spines under simultaneous multi-planar loading.

Sean L Borkowski1,2, Sophia N Sangiorgio3,4, Richard E Bowen1,5, Anthony A Scaduto1,5, Juliann Kwak1,5, Edward Ebramzadeh1,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The corrective potential of two posterior-only destabilization procedures for scoliosis deformity was quantified under single and multi-planar loading using cadaveric spines.
METHODS: Ten full-length human cadaveric thoracic spines were mounted in an 8-df servohydraulic load frame. Cyclic, pure moments were applied in: (1) flexion-extension, (2) lateral bending, (3) axial rotation, (4) flexion-extension with axial rotation, and (5) lateral bending with axial rotation at 0.5°/s, to ±4 Nm. Each specimen was tested intact, and again after nine en bloc bilateral total facetectomies, and one, two, three, and four levels of Ponte osteotomies. Motion was measured throughout loading using optical motion tracking.
RESULTS: Under single-plane loading, facetectomies and Ponte osteotomies increased thoracic spine flexibility in all three planes. Compared to total facetectomies, higher per-level increases were seen following Ponte osteotomies, with increases in total range of motion (total ROM) of up to 2.7° in flexion-extension, 1.4° in lateral bending, and 3.1° in axial rotation following each osteotomy. Compared to the facetectomies, four supplemental osteotomies increased total ROM by 23 % in flexion (p < 0.01) and 8 % in axial rotation (p < 0.01). Increases in lateral bending were smaller. Under multi-planar loading, each Ponte osteotomy provided simultaneous increases of up to 1.4°, 1.6°, and 2.2° in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.
CONCLUSIONS: Ponte osteotomies provided higher per-level increases in ROM under single-plane loading than total facetectomies alone. Further, Ponte osteotomies provided simultaneous increase in all three planes under multi-planar loading. These results indicated that, to predict the correction potential of a surgical release, multi-planar testing may be necessary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Range of motion; Scoliosis; Simultaneous loading

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25091262     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3499-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  26 in total

1.  An in vitro human cadaveric study investigating the biomechanical properties of the thoracic spine.

Authors:  Itaru Oda; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Bryan W Cunningham; Kiyoshi Kaneda; Paul C McAfee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of a bipedicular spinal fixation system: a comparative stiffness test.

Authors:  Laurent Balabaud; Emeric Gallard; Wafa Skalli; Jean-Pierre Lassau; François Lavaste; Jean-Paul Steib
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Biomechanical contribution of the rib cage to thoracic stability.

Authors:  Leonardo B C Brasiliense; Bruno C R Lazaro; Phillip M Reyes; Seref Dogan; Nicholas Theodore; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Pedicle screw fixation of the thoracic spine: an in vitro biomechanical study on different configurations.

Authors:  Vedat Deviren; Emre Acaroglu; Joe Lee; Masaru Fujita; Serena Hu; Lawrence G Lenke; David Polly; Timothy R Kuklo; Michael O'Brien; David Brumfield; Christian M Puttlitz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Ponte Osteotomies With Pedicle Screw Instrumentation in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Suken A Shah; Arjun A Dhawale; Jon E Oda; Petya Yorgova; Geraldine I Neiss; Laurens Holmes; Peter G Gabos
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2013-06-06

6.  The significance of the vertebral posterior elements in the mechanics of the thoracic spine.

Authors:  A A White; C Hirsch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1971 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  The role of posterior spinal osteotomies in pediatric spinal deformity surgery: indications and operative technique.

Authors:  Michel G Diab; Jeanne M Franzone; Michael G Vitale
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  The role of the sternum, costosternal articulations, intervertebral disc, and facets in thoracic sagittal plane biomechanics: a comparison of three different sequences of surgical release.

Authors:  William C Horton; Chaiwat Kraiwattanapong; Tomoyuki Akamaru; Akihito Minamide; Jin-Soo Park; Moon-Soo Park; William C Hutton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The posterior approach for lumbar and thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: posterior shortening and pedicle screws.

Authors:  Harry L Shufflebarger; Matthew J Geck; Cynthia E Clark
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The effect of posterior thoracic spine anatomical structures on motion segment flexion stiffness.

Authors:  Andy L Anderson; Terence E McIff; Marc A Asher; Douglas C Burton; R Christopher Glattes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.