Literature DB >> 19247164

The effect of posterior thoracic spine anatomical structures on motion segment flexion stiffness.

Andy L Anderson1, Terence E McIff, Marc A Asher, Douglas C Burton, R Christopher Glattes.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This in vitro human cadaveric study tested the loss of thoracic motion segment flexion stiffness after sequential posterior upper instrumented vertebra anchor placement techniques and posterior column destabilization.
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine the possible destabilizing effects of upper thoracic instrumentation anchor site preparation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Proximal junctional kyphosis after instrumentation and arthrodesis for scoliosis and related spine deformities has recently been reported to range from 10% to 46%. The effect of posterior skeletal dissection associated with upper instrumented vertebra anchor placement on adjacent motion segment flexion stiffness has not been previously studied. METHODS.: Twenty-three intact thoracic motion segments were obtained from 6 human cadavers. Biomechanical testing was performed with each motion segment flexed to approximately 3.2 degrees at a rate of 0.1 Hz, with corresponding torques recorded. Data were collected after a series of 6 posterior procedures. Differences with P value <0.01 were considered significant and those with P value <0.05 marginally significant.
RESULTS: Supratransverse process hook, supralaminar hook, pedicle screw placement, or pedicle screw removal done, bilaterally, produced similar, small (range, 2.09%-6.03%), nonsignificant reductions in motion segment flexion stiffness. But when totaled, these 4 procedures resulted in a significant 16.31% loss of flexion stiffness. The fifth procedure of supraspinous and interspinous process ligament transection added a marginally significant 6.59% incremental loss of flexion stiffness. Supralaminar hook site preparation combined with supraspinous and interspinous process ligament transection resulted in a marginally significant 12.62% incremental loss of flexion stiffness. Transection of the remaining posterior structures (facet joints and all other posterior soft tissue structures) produced a significant additional flexion stiffness loss of 44.72%. The anterior column alone provided only 32.39% of the total motion segment flexion stiffness. Transection of all posterior stabilizing structures, similar to a Smith-Peterson/chevron/Ponte resection, decreased motion segment flexion stiffness significantly, 67.61%.
CONCLUSION: Posterior thoracic skeletal structures involved in upper instrumented vertebra exposure andanchor placement were found to contribute to adjacent segment flexion stiffness. Although stiffness loss was small after individual procedures, the effects were additive for routinely used combinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19247164     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318198c62d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  20 in total

1.  The biomechanics of the pediatric and adult human thoracic spine.

Authors:  Francisco J Lopez-Valdes; Sabrina Lau; Patrick Riley; John Lamp; Richard Kent
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2011

2.  The effect of posterior spinal releases on axial correction torque: a cadaver study.

Authors:  John Wiemann; Shakeel Durrani; Patrick Bosch
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  Elastic resistance of the spine: Why does motion preservation surgery almost fail?

Authors:  Alessandro Landi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

4.  Reoperation rates in minimally invasive, hybrid and open surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity with minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  D Kojo Hamilton; Adam S Kanter; Bryan D Bolinger; Gregory M Mundis; Stacie Nguyen; Praveen V Mummaneni; Neel Anand; Richard G Fessler; Peter G Passias; Paul Park; Frank La Marca; Juan S Uribe; Michael Y Wang; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Christopher I Shaffrey; David O Okonkwo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Flexibility of thoracic spines under simultaneous multi-planar loading.

Authors:  Sean L Borkowski; Sophia N Sangiorgio; Richard E Bowen; Anthony A Scaduto; Juliann Kwak; Edward Ebramzadeh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Interspinous posterior devices: What is the real surgical indication?

Authors:  Alessandro Landi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  Biomechanical analysis of Ponte and pedicle subtraction osteotomies for the surgical correction of kyphotic deformities.

Authors:  Giuditta Salvi; Carl-Eric Aubin; Franck Le Naveaux; Xiaoyu Wang; Stefan Parent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  In vitro analysis of thoracic spinal motion segment flexibility during stepwise reduction of all functional structures.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Stefan Grundler; Claudia Ottardi; Chinnu-Elsa Mathew; Benedikt Schlager; Christian Liebsch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Prevention Strategies: A Video Technique Guide.

Authors:  Michael M Safaee; Joseph A Osorio; Kushagra Verma; Shay Bess; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Robert Hart; Vedat Deviren; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 2.703

Review 10.  Full-field in vitro investigation of hard and soft tissue strain in the spine by means of Digital Image Correlation.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Ruspi; Marco Palanca; Cesare Faldini; Luca Cristofolini
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2018-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.