Literature DB >> 25090234

Age at menarche and natural menopause and number of reproductive years in association with mortality: results from a median follow-up of 11.2 years among 31,955 naturally menopausal Chinese women.

Xiaoyan Wu1, Hui Cai1, Asha Kallianpur1, Yu-Tang Gao2, Gong Yang1, Wong-Ho Chow3, Hong-Lan Li2, Wei Zheng1, Xiao-Ou Shu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies conducted in Western countries suggest that early age at menarche and early age at menopause are both associated with increased total mortality, but limited data are available for Asian populations. We examined associations of age at menarche and natural menopause and duration of the reproductive span with mortality in a population-based cohort study of Chinese women.
METHODS: We evaluated the effects of age at menarche, age at natural menopause, and number of reproductive years on total and cause-specific mortality among 31,955 naturally menopausal Chinese women who participated in the Shanghai Women's Health Study, a population-based, prospective cohort study.
RESULTS: A total of 3,158 deaths occurred during a median follow-up of 11.2 years. Results from Cox proportional hazards models showed that younger age at menopause (<46.64 years) was associated with higher risk of total mortality (Ptrend= 0.02). Younger age at menarche (<14 years) was associated with higher risk of mortality from stroke (Ptrend= 0.03) and diabetes (Ptrend = 0.02) but lower risk of mortality from respiratory system cancer (Ptrend = 0.01). Women with a shorter reproductive span had lower risk of mortality from gynecological cancers (Ptrend = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that menstrual characteristics are important predictors of mortality, suggesting an important role of sex hormones in biological aging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25090234      PMCID: PMC4121137          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

The interval between menarche and menopause defines a woman's natural reproductive span [1]. Due to exposure to different hormonal environments, early or late onset of these events may be associated with an increased risk of many chronic health problems. Early menopause has been associated with increased risk of mortality from all causes [2]–[4], cardiovascular disease (CVD), and coronary heart disease (CHD) [4]–[7], but has not been associated with mortality from stroke or ischemic heart disease (IHD) [4], [8]. Early menarche has been associated with increased risk of mortality from all causes and CVD [9]–[11]. Other than CVD, few studies have examined the association of age at menarche and menopause with cause-specific mortality, and the results have been inconsistent [3], [4]. These findings are primarily based on studies conducted in Western populations. The few studies conducted among Asian women [12]–[15] were limited by one or more of the following factors: small sample size, focused only on cardiovascular cause-specific mortality, included only one component of reproductive information (e.g., age at menarche or age at menopause), no adjustment for other menstrual variables, or inadequate information on the cause of menopause. For example, Cui et al. found no statistically significant association of age at menarche, age at menopause, or number of reproductive years with mortality from CVD in a prospective study of 37,965 Japanese women [16]. Among 2,685 Korean women, Hong et al. observed that early menopause was associated with increased risk of mortality from all causes, CVD, and cancer [17]. Asian women, including Chinese women, have different menstrual and reproductive patterns as well as different lifestyle factors compared with women living in the United States and other Western countries. It is unclear whether menstrual characteristics are associated with mortality among Asian women. The objective of the present study was to examine the effects of age at menarche, age at natural menopause, and the duration of the reproductive span on total and cause-specific mortality among women who participated in the Shanghai Women's Health Study, a large, population-based cohort study conducted in China.

Methods

Ethics Statement

All participants provided written informed consent, and the study protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Vanderbilt University and the Shanghai Cancer Institute.

Study population

The Shanghai Women's Health Study is an ongoing, population-based, prospective cohort study, which enrolled 74,941women aged 40–70 years in 7 urban districts of Shanghai between 1997 and 2000 (participation rate: 92%). An in-person interview was conducted at baseline at an in-home visit, using a structured questionnaire to collect information on demographics, dietary habits, physical activity, occupational history, personal habits, history of chronic disease and surgery, family cancer history, reproductive history, and hormone use. Anthropometric measurements, including height, weight, and waist and hip circumferences, were also taken at baseline by trained personnel using standardized protocols. Details of the baseline survey have been published elsewhere [18]. Three biennial in-person follow-up surveys were conducted for all living cohort members at in-home visits conducted between 2000 to 2002 (response rate: 99.8%), 2002 to 2004 (response rate: 98.7%), and 2004 to 2007 (response rate: 96.7%) to collect information on occurrence and mortality from cancer, CVD, and other chronic diseases. The outcome information was supplemented by annual linkage to the population-based Shanghai cancer and vital statistics registries, which routinely collect data on vital status and cancer diagnosis. The out migration rate in Shanghai is extremely low, and thus, our follow-up for survival status for the study is virtually 100%. At the time of enrollment, 37,168 participants (49.6%) were postmenopausal. We excluded from the analysis all women with missing data on menarche (N = 3); body mass index (BMI) or waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) (N = 16); women who were lost to follow-up shortly after study enrollment (N = 6); were menopausal due to hysterectomy, ovariectomy, or other causes (N = 4,114); or had ever used hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (N = 1,074). Thus, 31,955 women (42.6% of all participants and 85.9% of postmenopausal women) who experienced natural menopause were included in the current study.

Menstrual variables

At baseline, each participant was asked her age at the time of her first period, which was recorded as age at menarche. Menopausal status was defined based on the World Health Organization's definition of menopause as the absence of menstruation for ≥12 months. The age at which menopause occurred and the reasons for its occurrence (natural menopause, hysterectomy or ovariectomy, or another cause) were recorded at baseline. The number of reproductive years (i.e., the “reproductive span”) was then calculated as the interval between age at menarche and age at menopause.

Outcome definition

The outcome for this study was death from any cause that occurred after the baseline survey but before December 31, 2009. For surviving participants, follow up time was censored at December 31, 2009. The International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) [19], was used to define the cause of death, which was classified into CVD (ICD codes:390–459), IHD (ICD codes: 410–414), stroke (ICD codes: 430–438), diabetes (ICD code: 250), any cancer (ICD codes: 140–208), gynecological cancers (ICD codes: 174, 179–183), digestive system cancers (ICD codes: 150–159), and respiratory system cancers (ICD codes:160–165).

Measurement of selected potential confounders

Socio-demographic information collected at baseline using the structured questionnaire included age at study enrollment (years), level of education (none, elementary school, middle school, high school, college or above), occupation (professional, clerical, manual laborer, housewife/retired), family income in yuan/year (<10,000; 10,000–19,999; 20,000–29,999;>30,000), marital status (yes: married; no: single, widow, divorced, separated), current smoking (yes, no), current drinking (yes, no), age at menarche (years), age at menopause (years), and number of live births. BMI (kg/m2) was calculated from weight (kg) and height squared (m2). WHR was calculated from waist circumference (cm) and hip circumference (cm). Physical activity was measured in metabolic equivalents (MET-h/day/year) based on a validated physical activity questionnaire [20].

Statistical analyses

Person-years of follow-up for each participant were calculated from the date of the baseline interview through the date of death or December 31, 2009. Women were divided into quintiles of menstrual variables based on their distributions in the study population. The following menstrual variable categories were used as the reference groups in the analyses: aged 15 years for age at menarche, aged 48.80–50.15 years for age at natural menopause, and 30.16–32.45 years for number of reproductive years. These reference groups were chosen because they cover the medians of each menstrual variable (i.e., age at menarche, 15 years; age at natural menopause, 49.58 years; and number of reproductive years, 31.33 years). Selected demographic and other factors were compared across categories of age at menopause, using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Cox proportional hazards models stratified by birth calendar year were employed to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for each group of menstrual variables adjusting for age at study enrollment (years), education (4 categories), occupation (4 categories), income (4 categories), marital status (yes/no), BMI (kg/m2), WHR (continuous), regular exercise (met/hour/year), current smoking (yes/no), current alcohol consumption (yes/no), number of live births, age at menarche (years, included in the Cox models for age at menopause and reproductive years), and age at menopause (years, included in the Cox models for age at menarche). Linear trends were tested across categories of menstrual variables by modeling the median values in each category. SAS (version 9.2, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) was used in all analyses and two-sided P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Women in the lowest quintile for age at menopause were more likely to be current smokers, current alcohol drinkers, and not married and to have lower household income; they were less likely to have a professional job; and they had fewer live births compared with other groups. Women in the highest quintile for age at menopause were older, were more likely to exercise regularly, were younger at menarche, had higher BMI, had more reproductive years, and were less likely to have attained a high school education compared with other groups. Differences in WHR across quintiles of age at menopause approached a statistically significant level (Table 1).
Table 1

Population characteristics by age at menopause (years), Shanghai Women's Health Study.

CharacteristicsQuintiles of age at menopause (years)All P valuea
<46.6446.64–48.7948.80–50.1550.16–52.03≥52.04(N = 31,955)
(N = 6,389)(N = 6,375)(N = 6,363)(N = 6,425)(N = 6,403)
Age at recruitment (years), mean (SD)59.65(7.43)60.49(6.46)60.87(5.94)61.00(5.46)62.03(4.54)59.65(7.43)<0.001
Body mass index, mean (SD)24.49(3.77)24.57(3.57)24.63(3.66)24.72(3.53)25.01(3.62)24.49(3.77)<0.001
Waist-to-hip ratio, mean (SD)0.826(0.057)0.824(0.056)0.825(0.056)0.825(0.055)0.827(0.054)0.825(0.056)0.07
Education, high school (%)16.6718.9519.3521.9414.9220.07<0.001
Occupation, professional (%)16.9525.3125.1433.3628.2728.30<0.001
Family income, < 10,000 yuan/year (%)23.0821.2320.8219.8022.7720.60<0.001
Regular exercise (%)46.5845.8048.2851.2452.1149.34<0.001
Current smoking (%)7.124.963.882.843.143.61<0.001
Current alcohol consumption (%)3.701.932.091.953.572.12<0.001
Married (%)79.3483.6282.8683.7780.8783.120.002
Age at menarche (years), mean (SD)15.21(1.88)15.27(1.79)15.27(1.82)15.17(1.82)15.16(1.79)15.21(1.88)0.02
Number of reproductive years, mean (SD)25.53(4.62)29.18(4.24)30.74(4.46)32.16(4.71)35.18(4.93)25.53(4.62)<0.001
Number of live births, mean (SD)2.48(1.46)2.60(1.45)2.58(1.38)2.57(1.31)2.69(1.28)2.48(1.46)<0.001

ANOVA for continuous variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables.

ANOVA for continuous variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables. During a median follow-up of 11.2 years, 3,158 women died. These deaths included 1,001 from all CVD (IHD: 236, stroke: 553), 246 from diabetes, 1,321 from all cancers (gynecological cancer: 174, digestive system cancer: 655, respiratory system cancer: 271), and 590 from other causes. Table 2 presents age-and multivariable-adjusted HRs of total and cause-specific mortality according to age at menopause. After adjustment for potential confounding factors, younger age at menopause (<46.64 years) was associated with higher risk of total mortality (HR (95%CIs):1.16 (1.04, 1.29), P trend = 0.02). Compared with the reference group (aged 48.80–50.15 years at menopause), being younger (<46.64 years) or older (50.16–52.03 years) at menopause was associated with higher risk of mortality from all cancers (HR (95%CIs): 1.27 (1.06, 1.51) for women aged <46.64 years and 1.34 (1.13,1.60) for women aged 50.16–52.03 years). Additionally, being younger (<46.64 years) or older (50.16–52.03 years) at menopause than the reference group was also associated with higher risk of mortality from digestive system cancers (HR (95%CIs): 1.43 (1.11, 1.84) for women aged <46.64 years and 1.38 (1.07, 1.77) for women aged 50.16–52.03 years). All of these associations were statistically significant. However, the trend for increasing mortality with increasing or decreasing age at menopause was not significant for all cancers combined or for digestive system cancers.
Table 2

HRs (95%CIs) of age at menopause (years) with total and cause-specific mortality, Shanghai Women's Health Study.

Cause of deathQuintiles of age at menopause (years) Ptrend c
<46.6446.64–48.7948.80–50.15a 50.16–52.03≥52.04
(N = 6,389)(N = 6,375)(N = 6,363)(N = 6,425)(N = 6,403)
All causes
Number of deaths675629606652596
Age-adjusted hazard ratio1.17(1.05,1.31)1.04(0.93,1.17)1.001.08(0.97,1.21)0.93(0.83,1.04)<0.001
Multivariate hazard ratiob 1.16(1.04,1.29)1.03(0.92,1.15)1.001.11(0.99,1.24)0.99(0.88,1.11)0.02
All CVD
Number of deaths215201219172194
Age-adjusted hazard ratio1.03(0.85,1.24)0.92(0.76,1.11)1.000.80(0.65,0.98)0.84(0.69,1.02)0.02
Multivariate hazard ratiob 1.01(0.83,1.22)0.90(0.74,1.09)1.000.82(0.67,1.00)0.89(0.73,1.08)0.15
Ischemic heart disease
Number of deaths5247434252
Age-adjusted hazard ratio1.27(0.85,1.90)1.10(0.72,1.66)1.001.00(0.65,1.52)1.15(0.76,1.72)0.50
Multivariate hazard ratiob 1.24(0.83,1.86)1.07(0.71,1.62)1.001.02(0.66,1.56)1.23(0.82,1.84)0.84
Stroke
Number of deaths11010413398108
Age-adjusted hazard ratio0.88(0.68,1.13)0.79(0.61,1.02)1.000.75(0.58,0.97)0.77(0.60,1.00)0.37
Multivariate hazard ratiob 0.86(0.66,1.11)0.77(0.60,1.00)1.000.76(0.59,0.99)0.81(0.63,1.04)0.71
Diabetes
Number of deaths5354514345
Age-adjusted hazard ratio1.08(0.74,1.59)1.06(0.72,1.55)1.000.86(0.57,1.29)0.84(0.56,1.25)0.13
Multivariate hazard ratiob 1.06(0.72,1.56)1.02(0.70,1.50)1.000.90(0.60,1.36)0.95(0.63,1.42)0.47
All cancers
Number of deaths273247227300274
Age-adjusted hazard ratio1.27(1.07,1.52)1.10(0.92,1.32)1.001.31(1.11,1.56)1.14(0.95,1.36)0.52
Multivariate hazard ratiob 1.27(1.06,1.51)1.09(0.91,1.31)1.001.34(1.13,1.60)1.18(0.99,1.41)0.88
Gynecological cancers
Number of deaths2530393941
Age-adjusted hazard ratio0.67(0.41,1.11)0.77(0.48,1.24)1.000.99(0.64,1.55)1.02(0.66,1.58)0.07
Multivariate hazard ratiob 0.69(0.42,1.15)0.78(0.48,1.25)1.001.03(0.66,1.61)1.07(0.68,1.67)0.05
Digestive system cancers
Number of deaths145126107144133
Age-adjusted hazard ratio1.43(1.12,1.84)1.19(0.92,1.54)1.001.34(1.05,1.73)1.17(0.91,1.52)0.18
Multivariate hazard ratiob 1.43(1.11,1.84)1.18(0.91,1.53)1.001.38(1.07,1.77)1.21(0.94,1.57)0.31
Respiratory system cancers
Number of deaths6451455952
Age-adjusted hazard ratio1.51(1.03,2.22)1.15(0.77,1.71)1.001.32(0.89,1.94)1.09(0.73,1.62)0.13
Multivariate hazard ratiob 1.49(1.01,2.18)1.14(0.76,1.70)1.001.33(0.90,1.96)1.12(0.75,1.67)0.20

Abbreviation: HR: hazard ratio; CIs: confidence intervals.

Reference category.

Adjusted for age at study enrollment, BMI, WHR, education, occupation, income, regular exercise (met/hour/year), current smoking (yes/no), current alcohol consumption (yes/no), marital status, age at menarche, and number of live births.

P for age at menopause (categorical).

Abbreviation: HR: hazard ratio; CIs: confidence intervals. Reference category. Adjusted for age at study enrollment, BMI, WHR, education, occupation, income, regular exercise (met/hour/year), current smoking (yes/no), current alcohol consumption (yes/no), marital status, age at menarche, and number of live births. P for age at menopause (categorical). In the multivariable models, younger age at menarche was associated with a trend of increased risk of mortality from all causes (Table 3). Compared with women aged 15 years at menarche, HRs and 95%CIs were 1.09 (0.97, 1.23) for women aged <14 years at menarche, 0.97 (0.86, 1.09) for women aged 14 years, 0.93 (0.83, 1.03) for women aged 16 years, and 0.94 (0.85,1.03) for women aged ≥17 years (P trend = 0.01). Younger age at menarche was also associated with mortality from stroke. Compared with women aged 15 years at menarche, HRs and (95%CIs) were 1.23 (0.93,1.62) for women aged <14 years at menarche, 1.00 (0.75,1.33) for women aged 14 years, 0.99 (0.76,1.28) for women aged 16 years, and 0.87 (0.68,1.12 for women aged ≥17 years (P trend = 0.03). Younger age at menarche was also associated with mortality from diabetes. Compared with women aged 15 years at menarche, HRs and (95%CIs) were 1.27 (0.81, 1.99) for women aged <14 years at menarche, 1.33 (0.88, 2.01) for women aged 14 years, 1.06 (0.72, 1.58) for women aged 16 years, and 0.84 (0.58, 1.23) for women aged ≥17 years (P trend = 0.02). On the other hand, younger age at menarche was associated with a trend of lower risk of mortality from respiratory system cancers. Compared with women aged 15 years at menarche, HRs and (95%CIs) were 0.74 (0.48, 1.14) for women aged <14 years at menarche, 0.71 (0.47, 1.09) for women aged 14 years, 0.96 (0.67, 1.39) for women aged 16 years, and 1.15 (0.82, 1.61) for women aged ≥17 years (P trend = 0.01).
Table 3

HRs (95%CIs) of age at menarche (years) with total and cause-specific mortality, Shanghai Women's Health Study.

Cause of deathQuintiles of age at menarche (years) Ptrend c
<141415a 16≥17
(N = 5,934)(N = 5,784)(N = 6,590)(N = 6,178)(N = 7,469)
All causes
Number of deaths503492646629888
Age-adjusted hazard ratio0.99(0.88,1.12)0.92(0.82,1.03)1.000.96(0.86,1.07)1.03(0.93,1.14)0.32
Multivariate hazard ratiob 1.09(0.97,1.23)0.97(0.86,1.09)1.000.93(0.83,1.03)0.93(0.84,1.03)0.01
All CVD
Number of deaths150150198216287
Age-adjusted hazard ratio1.01(0.81,1.25)0.93(0.75,1.15)1.001.05(0.87,1.28)1.04(0.86,1.24)0.42
Multivariate hazard ratiob 1.14(0.92,1.41)1.00(0.81,1.23)1.001.02(0.84,1.24)0.93(0.78,1.12)0.11
Ischemic heart disease
Number of deaths2836475471
Age-adjusted hazard ratio0.80(0.50,1.27)0.95(0.61,1.46)1.001.11(0.75,1.64)1.07(0.74,1.56)0.16
Multivariate hazard ratiob 0.91(0.56,1.45)1.01(0.65,1.56)1.001.05(0.71,1.55)0.93(0.64,1.35)0.99
Stroke
Number of deaths918411117150
Age-adjusted hazard ratio1.09(0.83,1.44)0.93(0.70,1.24)1.001.02(0.78,1.32)0.96(0.75,1.23)0.57
Multivariate hazard ratiob 1.23(0.93,1.62)1.00(0.75,1.33)1.000.99(0.76,1.28)0.87(0.68,1.12)0.03
Diabetes
Number of deaths3345465567
Age-adjusted hazard ratio0.98(0.62,1.53)1.21(0.80,1.83)1.001.15(0.77,1.69)1.02(0.70,1.49)0.97
Multivariate hazard ratiob 1.27(0.81,1.99)1.33(0.88,2.01)1.001.06(0.72,1.58)0.84(0.58,1.23)0.02
All cancers
Number of deaths215210293254349
Age-adjusted hazard ratio0.90(0.75,1.07)0.85(0.71,1.01)1.000.87(0.74,1.03)0.93(0.8,1.09)0.65
Multivariate hazard ratiob 0.94(0.78,1.12)0.87(0.73,1.04)1.000.85(0.72,1.01)0.89(0.76,1.04)0.48
Gynecological cancers
Number of deaths3029373345
Age-adjusted hazard ratio0.94(0.58,1.52)0.91(0.56,1.48)1.000.92(0.58,1.48)1.01(0.65,1.57)0.74
Multivariate hazard ratiob 0.90(0.55,1.46)0.89(0.55,1.46)1.000.91(0.57,1.46)1.01(0.65,1.58)0.63
Digestive system cancers
Number of deaths109112150123161
Age-adjusted hazard ratio0.90(0.70,1.15)0.89(0.69,1.13)1.000.82(0.65,1.04)0.83(0.67,1.04)0.37
Multivariate hazard ratiob 0.95(0.74,1.23)0.92(0.72,1.17)1.000.80(0.63,1.02)0.79(0.63,0.98)0.06
Respiratory system cancers
Number of deaths3434585688
Age-adjusted hazard ratio0.75(0.49,1.14)0.71(0.46,1.08)1.000.96(0.65,1.38)1.15(0.82,1.68)0.01
Multivariate hazard ratiob 0.74(0.48,1.14)0.71(0.47,1.09)1.000.96(0.67,1.39)1.15(0.82,1.61)0.01

Abbreviation: HR: hazard ratio; CIs: confidence intervals.

Reference category.

Adjusted for age at study enrollment, BMI, WHR, education, occupation, income, regular exercise (met/hour/year), current smoking (yes/no), current alcohol consumption (yes/no), marital status, age at menopause, and number of live births.

P for age at menarche (categorical).

Abbreviation: HR: hazard ratio; CIs: confidence intervals. Reference category. Adjusted for age at study enrollment, BMI, WHR, education, occupation, income, regular exercise (met/hour/year), current smoking (yes/no), current alcohol consumption (yes/no), marital status, age at menopause, and number of live births. P for age at menarche (categorical). Women with a longer reproductive span had a significant trend of increased risk of mortality from gynecological cancers after adjustment for potential confounding factors (P trend = 0.03, Table 4). Compared with women with a reproductive span of 30.16–32.45 years, HRs and 95%CIs were 0.66 (0.40, 1.11) for women with a reproductive span of <27.11 years, 0.84 (0.52, 1.35) for a span of 27.11–30.15 years; 1.24 (0.80, 1.94) for a span of 32.46–34.86 years, and 1.11 (0.68, 1.80) for a span of ≥34.87 years.
Table 4

HRs (95%CIs) of reproductive years with total and cause-specific mortality, Shanghai Women's Health Study.

Cause of deathQuintiles of reproductive years (years) Ptrend c
<27.1127.11–30.1530.16–32.45a 32.46–34.86≥34.87
(N = 6,373)(N = 6,404)(N = 6,386)(N = 6,394)(N = 6,398)
All causes
Number of deaths730703625582518
Age-adjusted hazard ratio1.11(0.99,1.25)1.03(0.92,1.16)1.001.01(0.90,1.14)0.88(0.78,1.00)<0.001
Multivariate hazard ratiob 1.10(0.98,1.22)1.03(0.92,1.15)1.001.06(0.94,1.19)0.99(0.88,1.12)0.16
All CVD
Number of deaths242228198176157
Age-adjusted hazard ratio1.19(0.97,1.46)1.04(0.85,1.28)1.001.01(0.82,1.26)0.86(0.69,1.09)0.004
Multivariate hazard ratiob 1.11(0.92,1.35)1.03(0.85,1.24)1.001.06(0.87,1.30)1.03(0.83,1.28)0.43
Ischemic heart disease
Number of deaths5058514532
Age-adjusted hazard ratio0.91(0.60,1.39)0.94(0.62,1.43)1.001.03(0.67,1.59)0.63(0.38,1.04)0.41
Multivariate hazard ratiob 0.87(0.58,1.30)0.99(0.68,1.45)1.001.09(0.73,1.64)0.87(0.55,1.38)0.64
Stroke
Number of deaths1261211099898
Age-adjusted hazard ratio1.14(0.86,1.49)1.04(0.79,1.37)1.001.02(0.76,1.37)0.99(0.73,1.33)0.30
Multivariate hazard ratiob 1.05(0.81,1.37)0.99(0.76,1.28)1.001.07(0.81,1.41)1.16(0.87,1.54)0.61
Diabetes
Number of deaths5464534530
Age-adjusted hazard ratio1.01(0.67,1.50)1.05(0.71,1.56)1.000.99(0.65,1.52)0.62(0.38,1.01)0.12
Multivariate hazard ratiob 0.89(0.60,1.32)1.05(0.73,1.52)1.001.07(0.72,1.60)0.85(0.54,1.35)0.80
All cancers
Number of deaths294272251263241
Age-adjusted hazard ratio1.12(0.93,1.33)0.99(0.83,1.19)1.001.07(0.89,1.28)0.99(0.82,1.19)0.27
Multivariate hazard ratiob 1.13(0.95,1.34)1.02(0.86,1.22)1.001.13(0.95,1.35)1.04(0.87,1.26)0.52
Gynecological cancers
Number of deaths2532374337
Age-adjusted hazard ratio0.60(0.36,1.00)0.79(0.49,1.27)1.001.08(0.69,1.68)0.93(0.59,1.48)0.04
Multivariate hazard ratiob 0.66(0.40,1.11)0.84(0.52,1.35)1.001.24(0.80,1.94)1.11(0.68,1.80)0.03
Digestive system cancers
Number of deaths153131126134111
Age-adjusted hazard ratio1.18(0.92,1.53)1.02(0.78,1.32)1.001.12(0.86,1.46)0.94(0.71,1.24)0.16
Multivariate hazard ratiob 1.21(0.95,1.53)1.00(0.78,1.28)1.001.13(0.89,1.45)0.93(0.71,1.21)0.11
Respiratory system cancers
Number of deaths6572474047
Age-adjusted hazard ratio1.31(0.90,1.91)1.42(0.98,2.05)1.000.93(0.61,1.42)1.07(0.71,1.60)0.07
Multivariate hazard ratiob 1.25(0.85,1.83)1.36(0.94,1.98)1.000.97(0.63,1.48)1.15(0.75,1.76)0.35

Abbreviation: HR: hazard ratio; CIs: confidence intervals.

Reference category.

Adjusted for age at study enrollment, BMI, WHR, education, occupation, income, regular exercise (met/hour/year), current smoking (yes/no), current alcohol consumption (yes/no), marital status, age at menarche, and number of live births.

P for number of reproductive years (categorical).

Abbreviation: HR: hazard ratio; CIs: confidence intervals. Reference category. Adjusted for age at study enrollment, BMI, WHR, education, occupation, income, regular exercise (met/hour/year), current smoking (yes/no), current alcohol consumption (yes/no), marital status, age at menarche, and number of live births. P for number of reproductive years (categorical). Older age at menarche was associated with higher risk of mortality from lung cancer (P trend = 0.02), and a similar association was observed among non-smokers (P trend = 0.02). However, no other statistically significant associations were found in the current study between the three menstrual history variables and mortality from breast, endometrial, colorectal, or gastric cancers (data not shown).

Discussion

Results from this large, prospective cohort study of Chinese women aged 40–70 years suggest that younger age at menopause was associated with higher total mortality. Early menarche was associated with higher risk of mortality from all causes, stroke, and diabetes, but with lower risk of mortality from respiratory system cancers. A longer reproductive span was associated with higher mortality from gynecological cancers. Our result that early menopause increases total mortality is consistent with results from most previous studies on this topic [2], [4], [5], [17], [21], which supports the hypothesis that early natural menopause is a general indicator of premature aging [22]. In line with results from studies in Western populations [9], [11], [23], an inverse association between age at menarche and total mortality was also found in our study. Our findings that both late menarche and late natural menopause were associated with lower risk of total mortality adds further support to previous findings that women who are biologically younger than their chronologic age (have late menarche or late natural menopause) have lower mortality than women with an average age at menarche or natural menopause [23]. In the Seventh-Day Adventist study in California, postmenopausal women were categorized into groups according to age at menarche (<12, 12, 13, 14, 15, >15). Each increase in category of age at menarche was observed to decrease risk of stroke mortality by 9.6% (95%CI:0.4–18.6) after adjustment for BMI, physical activity, age at first birth, type of menopause, and use of HRT [11]. Similar to this finding, late menarche was associated with lower risk of stroke and diabetes mortality in our study. Many studies have shown that early menarche is associated with increased cardiovascular disease, possibly due to the increased body fatness in childhood [24]. Early menarche has also been associated with increased risk of diabetes in adults [25], one of the main risk factors for stroke [26]. Consequently, the inverse association between age at menarche and stroke mortality could also partly be explained by the inverse association between age at menarche and diabetes risk. Late menarche was related to high risk of mortality from respiratory system cancers in our study. Our results also indicated that lung cancer mortality contributed to this association. Studies examining late menarche and lung cancer risk have been inconsistent, indicating either no significant effect or decreased risk [27]–[30]. To our knowledge, the association of late menarche with higher lung cancer mortality is a novel finding and needs to be confirmed in further studies. Among 68,154 US women who experienced natural menopause and had not used tobacco or HRT, Mondul et al. observed that mortality from breast or ovarian cancer was lower among women whose age at menopause was 40–44 years (rate ratio [95%CIs]: 0.68 [0.56, 0.82] or 45–49 years (0.93 [0.83, 1.03]), compared with women whose age at menopause was 50–54 years [3]. Although no significant association between age at menopause and gynecological cancer mortality was found in our study, we observed that having a shorter reproductive span was associated with lower risk mortality from gynecological cancers. It has been suggested that the inverse association between age at menopause and gynecological cancer risk is due to the cessation of cyclical ovarian hormone production at menopause [31]–[33]. The shorter the reproductive span, the lower the cumulative lifetime exposure to endogenous hormones would be in these women. Consequently, the reduction in circulating hormone concentrations might lead to a reduction in relative risk for gynecological cancers. The ‘U-shaped’ relationship between age at menopause and mortality from all cancers observed in the current study appears to be related to death due to an excess of digestive and respiratory system cancers among women with early age at menopause and an excess of gynecological cancers for women with late age at menopause. More studies are warranted to investigate the role of sex hormone in the etiology and prognosis of these cancers. Strengths of this study include: the prospective design, the large population-based sample size, and the high response rates. In addition, the current study was restricted to women who had natural menopause and had never used HRT. The main limitation of this study is that ages at menarche and menopause were self-reported and may, therefore, be subject to recall bias. However, previous studies have reported that the recall of age at menarche and menopause is relatively accurate [34], [35]. In addition, although P-values for the trend tests were significant, many point estimates were not statistically significant and confidence intervals included 1.00. It should also be noted that our study involved multiple comparisons which may have led an increase of false positive findings (inflated type 1 error). Moreover, event numbers for some of the sub-group analyses were low, and thus, some results could have been due to chance findings. Furthermore, due to the differences in dietary and environmental exposures, the findings of our study may not be directly generalizable to other populations. In summary, this study of Chinese women found inverse associations for age at menarche and natural menopause with total mortality and for age at menarche with mortality from stroke and diabetes. However, we found positive associations for age at menarche with mortality from respiratory system cancers, as well as for duration of the reproductive span with mortality from gynecological cancers. Our results demonstrate that women who experience early menarche or early natural menopause tend to have increased total mortality.
  34 in total

1.  Early age at menarche associated with increased all-cause mortality.

Authors:  Koji Tamakoshi; Hiroshi Yatsuya; Akiko Tamakoshi
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Reproductive risk factors for cardiovascular disease mortality among postmenopausal women in Korea: the Kangwha Cohort Study, 1985-2005.

Authors:  Hoo Sun Chang; Nemekhee Odongua; Heechoul Ohrr; Jae Woong Sull; Chung Mo Nam
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Age at menarche and menopause of uterine cancer patients.

Authors:  J de Graaff; L A Stolte
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Reproductive factors, hormone use and the risk of lung cancer among middle-aged never-smoking Japanese women: a large-scale population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Manami Inoue; Tomotaka Sobue; Shoichiro Tsugane
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2005-11-20       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Early age at menarche, lung function, and adult asthma.

Authors:  Ferenc Macsali; Francisco Gómez Real; Estel Plana; Jordi Sunyer; Josep Anto; Julia Dratva; Christer Janson; Deborah Jarvis; Ernst Reidar Omenaas; Elisabeth Zemp; Matthias Wjst; Benedicte Leynaert; Cecilie Svanes
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Stroke epidemiology and one-month fatality among an urban population in Iran.

Authors:  Ahmad Delbari; Reza Salman Roghani; Sayed Shahaboddin Tabatabaei; Mehdi Rahgozar; Johan Lokk
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 5.266

7.  The Shanghai Women's Health Study: rationale, study design, and baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Wei Zheng; Wong-Ho Chow; Gong Yang; Fan Jin; Nathaniel Rothman; Aaron Blair; Hong-Lan Li; Wanqing Wen; Bu-Tian Ji; Qi Li; Xiao-Ou Shu; Yu-Tang Gao
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Association of low age at menarche with increased all-cause mortality: a 37-year follow-up of 61,319 Norwegian women.

Authors:  Bjarne K Jacobsen; Ivar Heuch; Gunnar Kvåle
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Body mass index and stroke mortality by smoking and age at menopause among Korean postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Yi; Nemekhee Odongua; Chung Mo Nam; Jae Woong Sull; Heechoul Ohrr
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Relationships of age at menarche and menopause, and reproductive year with mortality from cardiovascular disease in Japanese postmenopausal women: the JACC study.

Authors:  Renzhe Cui; Hiroyasu Iso; Hideaki Toyoshima; Chigusa Date; Akio Yamamoto; Shogo Kikuchi; Takaaki Kondo; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Akio Koizumi; Yutaka Inaba; Akiko Tamakoshi
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.211

View more
  24 in total

1.  Interaction between cigarette smoking and genetic polymorphisms on the associations with age of natural menopause and reproductive lifespan: the Singapore Chinese Health Study.

Authors:  Zhongwei Huang; Xuling Chang; Ling Wang; Jianjun Liu; Chew-Kiat Heng; Chiea-Chuen Khor; Jian-Min Yuan; Woon-Puay Koh; Rajkumar Dorajoo
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 6.353

2.  Ages at menarche and menopause and reproductive lifespan as predictors of exceptional longevity in women: the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Aladdin H Shadyab; Caroline A Macera; Richard A Shaffer; Sonia Jain; Linda C Gallo; Margery L S Gass; Molly E Waring; Marcia L Stefanick; Andrea Z LaCroix
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Sex differences in biological aging with a focus on human studies.

Authors:  Sara Hägg; Juulia Jylhävä
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Chemotherapy-Related Amenorrhea and Menopause in Young Chinese Breast Cancer Patients: Analysis on Incidence, Risk Factors and Serum Hormone Profiles.

Authors:  Giok S Liem; Frankie K F Mo; Elizabeth Pang; Joyce J S Suen; Nelson L S Tang; Kun M Lee; Claudia H W Yip; Wing H Tam; Rita Ng; Jane Koh; Christopher C H Yip; Grace W S Kong; Winnie Yeo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Reproductive factors and risk of mortality in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition; a cohort study.

Authors:  Melissa A Merritt; Elio Riboli; Neil Murphy; Mai Kadi; Anne Tjønneland; Anja Olsen; Kim Overvad; Laure Dossus; Laureen Dartois; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Renée T Fortner; Verena A Katzke; Heiner Boeing; Antonia Trichopoulou; Pagona Lagiou; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Domenico Palli; Sabina Sieri; Rosario Tumino; Carlotta Sacerdote; Salvatore Panico; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Petra H Peeters; Eiliv Lund; Aurelie Nakamura; Elisabete Weiderpass; J Ramón Quirós; Antonio Agudo; Esther Molina-Montes; Nerea Larrañaga; Miren Dorronsoro; Lluís Cirera; Aurelio Barricarte; Åsa Olsson; Salma Butt; Annika Idahl; Eva Lundin; Nicholas J Wareham; Timothy J Key; Paul Brennan; Pietro Ferrari; Petra A Wark; Teresa Norat; Amanda J Cross; Marc J Gunter
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Age at menarche and risk of major cardiovascular diseases: Evidence of birth cohort effects from a prospective study of 300,000 Chinese women.

Authors:  Ling Yang; Liming Li; Iona Y Millwood; Sanne A E Peters; Yiping Chen; Yu Guo; Zheng Bian; Xiaofang Chen; Lingli Chen; Shixian Feng; Silu Lv; Zhigang Pang; Mark Woodward; Zhengming Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.164

7.  Pubertal Growth, IGF-1, and Windows of Susceptibility: Puberty and Future Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Frank M Biro; Bin Huang; Halley Wasserman; Catherine M Gordon; Susan M Pinney
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.012

8.  Joint Associations of Actual Age and Genetically Determined Age at Menarche With Risk of Mortality.

Authors:  Zhaoxia Liang; Hao Ma; Qiying Song; Dianjianyi Sun; Tao Zhou; Yoriko Heianza; Danqing Chen; Lu Qi
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-06-01

9.  Age at menarche and endometrial cancer risk: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Gong; Yong-Lai Wang; Xiao-Xin Ma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Menopause Characteristics, Total Reproductive Years, and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Among Chinese Women.

Authors:  Ling Yang; Liling Lin; Christiana Kartsonaki; Yu Guo; Yiping Chen; Zheng Bian; Kaixu Xie; Donghui Jin; Liming Li; Jun Lv; Zhengming Chen
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2017-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.