| Literature DB >> 25089907 |
Elena G Ruano1, Silvia Canivell2, Elaine Vieira1.
Abstract
REV-ERB ALPHA has been shown to link metabolism with circadian rhythms. We aimed to identify new polymorphisms in the promoter of REV-ERB ALPHA and tested whether these polymorphisms could be associated with obesity in the Spanish population. Of the 1197 subjects included in our study, 779 were obese (BMI 34.38±3.1 kg/m2) and 418 lean (BMI 23.27±1.5 kg/m2). In the obese group, 469 of the 779 had type 2 diabetes. Genomic DNA from all the subjects was obtained from peripheral blood cells and the genotyping in the REV-ERB ALPHA promoter was analyzed by High Resolution Melting. We found six polymorphisms in the REV-ERB ALPHA promoter and identified rs939347 as a SNP with the highest frequency in the total population. We did not find any association between rs939347 and type 2 diabetes (p = 0.101), but rs939347 was associated with obesity (p = 0.036) with the genotype AA exhibiting higher frequency in the obese (5.2% in total obese vs 2.4% in lean). This association was found only in men (p = 0.031; 6.5% AA-carriers in obese men vs 1.9% AA-carriers in lean men), with no association found in the female population (p = 0.505; 4.4% AA-carriers in obese women vs 2.7% AA-carriers in lean women). Our results suggest that the REV-ERB ALPHA rs939347 polymorphism could modulate body fat mass in men. The present work supports the role of REV-ERB ALPHA in the development of obesity as well as a potential target for the treatment of obesity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25089907 PMCID: PMC4121274 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical characteristics of the subjects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| 62.7±8.9 | 62.1±8.8 | 65.8±8.9 | 64.33±9.0 | 0.003 | NS | 0.001 | 0.001 |
|
| 37.4% (157) | 36.7% (114) | 44.5% (209) | 41.4% (323) | NS | NS | 0.04 | 0.03 |
|
| 23.27±1.5 | 34.8±3.0 | 34.1±3.8 | 34.38±3.1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.01 |
|
| 82.81±8.1 | 110.3±11.6 | 111.6±9.9 | 111.12±10.6 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | NS |
|
| 87.6±11.8 | 103.5±18.9 | 162.1±58.8 | 140.47±55.6 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
|
| ND | 5.4±0.6 | 7.6±1.5 | 7.03±1.6 | 0.000 | |||
|
| 202.4±55.1 | 202.2±41.6 | 182.1±40.2 | 188.91±42.9 | 0.000 | NS | 0.000 | 0.000 |
|
| 107.48±37.9 | 127.5±35.7 | 106.6±32.2 | 113.54±35.7 | NS | 0.000 | NS | 0.000 |
|
| 57.93±18.5 | 50.2±14.3 | 46.3±16.6 | 48.03±19.9 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.003 |
|
| 90.78±41.9 | 137±82.9 | 158.7±97.1 | 150.0±92.9 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.004 |
|
| 1.7±5.1 | 4.8±6.3 | 5.0±5.8 | 4.8±6.0 | 0.002 | 0.01 | 0.009 | NS |
|
| 104.2±54.9 | 69.7±40.2 | 79.9±46.8 | 73.3±42.9 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | NS |
|
| 16.1±9.4 | 9.2±7.9 | 8.5±6.0 | 8.8±6.9 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | NS |
P1 = Lean vs total obese population; P2 = Lean vs Obese (OB); P3 = Lean vs type 2 diabetes (T2D); P4 = OB vs T2D.
Genotype distribution of rs939347 among lean, obese and T2D subjects by gender.
| SNP | Lean | Obese | T2D | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | ||||||
| rs939347 | Men | Women | Total | Men | Women | Total | Men | Women | Total | ||||
| GG | 93 | 168 | 261 | 80 | 124 | 204 | 123 | 167 | 290 | 0.036 | 0.023 | 0.101 | 0.390 |
| AG | 61 | 85 | 146 | 25 | 62 | 87 | 72 | 82 | 154 | ||||
| AA | 3 | 7 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 13 | 11 | 24 | ||||
| Total | 155 | 257 | 417 | 113 | 195 | 308 | 208 | 260 | 468 | ||||
| rs2071427 | |||||||||||||
| CC | 85 | 150 | 235 | 81 | 110 | 191 | 117 | 145 | 262 | 0.769 | 0.280 | 0.996 | 0.232 |
| CT | 61 | 96 | 157 | 27 | 71 | 98 | 81 | 95 | 176 | ||||
| TT | 11 | 15 | 26 | 5 | 14 | 19 | 10 | 19 | 29 | ||||
| Total | 157 | 261 | 418 | 113 | 195 | 308 | 208 | 259 | 467 | ||||
P1 = Lean vs total obese population; P2 = Controls vs Obese (OB); P3 = Controls vs type 2 diabetes (T2D); P4 = Ob vs T2D.
Association of risk genotype AA vs AG+GG in rs939347 with study variables.
| OR [95%CI] | P Value | AdjustedP value* | Adjusted P value*in men | Adjusted P value*in women | |
|
| 1.05 [1.00–1.10] | 0.062 | 0.053 | 0.039 | 0.554 |
|
| Reference group | ||||
|
| 2.40 [1.14–5.04] | 0.021 | 0.019 | 0.078 | 0.133 |
|
| 2.07 [0.92–4.67] | 0.080 | 0.071 | 0.051 | 0.662 |
|
| 1.03 [1.01–1.05] | 0.014 | 0.010 | 0.066 | 0.094 |
|
| 2.35 [0.83–6.69] | 0.108 | 0.081 | 0.105 | 0.460 |
Results of logistic regresion models of having the genotype AA versus having the genotype AG and/or the genotype GG in the SNP 939347 by increasing levels of the aforementioned variables. *Multivariate models were creating adjusting by age and gender. **if waist circumference >94 cm in men and >80 cm in women, according to EGIR criteria (1999).
Association between rs939347 and the risk of obesity.
| Non-obese | Obese | |
|
| 10 (20%) | 41 (80%) |
|
| 144 (38%) | 240 (62%) |
|
| 260 (35%) | 491 (65%) |
|
| 2.46 (1.19–5.06) | |
|
| 2.28 (1.12–4.64) | |
|
| 0.90 (0.69–1.16) | |
Obesity risk is defined as BMI > 30 kg/m2. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism. P values were adjusted for age and gender.
Association between rs939347 and the risk of obesity by gender.
| Lean men | Obese men | |
|
| 3 (12%) | 21 (88%) |
|
| 60 (38%) | 97 (62%) |
|
| 92 (31%) | 201 (69%) |
|
| 3.90 (1.10–13.78) | |
|
| 1.66 (0.67–4.12) | |
|
| 3.24(0.94–11.19) | |
|
| 1.70 (0.70–4.17) | |
|
| 0.73 (0.48–1.09) | |
|
| 1.03 (0.73–1.43) | |
Obese is defined as having a BMI>30 kg/m2. Lean is defined as having a BMI<26 kg/m2. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Figure 1Association of rs939347 with obesity features.
A) Waist circumference in men. B) BMI in men C) Waist circumference in women D) BMI in women.