RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the value of diffusion-weighted (DW), perfusion-sensitive, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques in assessing the response of bone metastases from breast cancer to radiotherapy, with particular emphasis on the role of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-DW parameters as a potential valuable imaging marker of tumor response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen women having breast cancer and bone metastases underwent MRI before and after radiotherapy (3 weeks [time 1], 2 months [time 2], and 4 months [time 3]), consisting of DW, perfusion-sensitive (IVIM), and DCE acquisitions. MR-based DW and perfusion parameters, including water diffusivity (D), perfusion fraction (f), pseudodiffusion (D*), total apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC-total), fractionated ADCs (ADC-high and ADC-low), and initial area under the gadolinium concentration curve after the first 60 seconds (IAUGC60), were determined. The morphologic MRI findings were also recorded. A one-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare the value of MR-based parameters at the different time points. RESULTS: A significant variation between pretreatment (time 0) and post-treatment (times 1, 2, and 3) was found for ADC-total and D parameters (P < .001). A statistically significant reduction was also found for IAUGC60 values between times 0 and 3 (P < .001). A significant change across the different time points was observed for D* and IAUGC60 parameters (P < .001). On the contrary, there was no statistically significant change over time for parameters ADC-total, D, f, and IAUGC60 comparing response between each metastasis, that is, the response to therapy was similar for each metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: DW, IVIM, and DCE-MRI techniques show effectiveness in assessing the response to radiotherapy in bone metastases from breast cancer.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the value of diffusion-weighted (DW), perfusion-sensitive, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques in assessing the response of bone metastases from breast cancer to radiotherapy, with particular emphasis on the role of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-DW parameters as a potential valuable imaging marker of tumor response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen women having breast cancer and bone metastases underwent MRI before and after radiotherapy (3 weeks [time 1], 2 months [time 2], and 4 months [time 3]), consisting of DW, perfusion-sensitive (IVIM), and DCE acquisitions. MR-based DW and perfusion parameters, including water diffusivity (D), perfusion fraction (f), pseudodiffusion (D*), total apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC-total), fractionated ADCs (ADC-high and ADC-low), and initial area under the gadolinium concentration curve after the first 60 seconds (IAUGC60), were determined. The morphologic MRI findings were also recorded. A one-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare the value of MR-based parameters at the different time points. RESULTS: A significant variation between pretreatment (time 0) and post-treatment (times 1, 2, and 3) was found for ADC-total and D parameters (P < .001). A statistically significant reduction was also found for IAUGC60 values between times 0 and 3 (P < .001). A significant change across the different time points was observed for D* and IAUGC60 parameters (P < .001). On the contrary, there was no statistically significant change over time for parameters ADC-total, D, f, and IAUGC60 comparing response between each metastasis, that is, the response to therapy was similar for each metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: DW, IVIM, and DCE-MRI techniques show effectiveness in assessing the response to radiotherapy in bone metastases from breast cancer.
Authors: Theodoros Soldatos; Shivani Ahlawat; Elizabeth Montgomery; Majid Chalian; Michael A Jacobs; Laura M Fayad Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Fatemeh Adelnia; Michelle Shardell; Christopher M Bergeron; Kenneth W Fishbein; Richard G Spencer; Luigi Ferrucci; David A Reiter Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: William A Hall; Eric S Paulson; Uulke A van der Heide; Clifton D Fuller; B W Raaymakers; Jan J W Lagendijk; X Allen Li; David A Jaffray; Laura A Dawson; Beth Erickson; Marcel Verheij; Kevin J Harrington; Arjun Sahgal; Percy Lee; Parag J Parikh; Michael F Bassetti; Clifford G Robinson; Bruce D Minsky; Ananya Choudhury; Robert J H A Tersteeg; Christopher J Schultz Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2019-10-12 Impact factor: 9.162