Natacha Raissa Doudou1,2, Yajie Liu2, Sylvanus Kampo3, Kai Zhang2, Yue Dai2, Shaowu Wang4,5. 1. Department of Radiology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China. 2. Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China. 4. Department of Radiology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China. wsw_2018@163.com. 5. Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China. wsw_2018@163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the variability of intravoxel incoherent motion measurements acquired from reduced distributions of b values for breast tumors analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The investigations were carried out on twenty-four patients with diagnosed breast tumors. A conventional unenhanced MRI and various IVIM series preset with different distributions of b values (0-1000 s/mm2) were performed. We assessed the variability in Dslow, Dfast, and PF measurements for different distributions of 9 to 4 b values compared with the IVIM metrics for 10 b values using Wilcoxon-Signed rank test. The data was statistically significant at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The results showed no significant variation in the estimations of IVIM parameters in patients. However, the measurements acquired with the combination of 5 b values Showed some variation in Dfast (P = 0.028) compared with 10 b values. The data showed high wCVs in the measurements acquired using the reduced set of 6 b values for Dslow and PF and with the combination of 7 b values for Dfast. There were inconsistencies noticed in the measurements acquired from malignant tumors using reduced distributions of b values (9 b values-4 b values). However, the set of 4 b values displayed the lowest wCVs for both benign and malignant datasets. We also observed unsystematic correlations among different combinations of b values in the categories of IVIM parameters. CONCLUSION: There was no relevant variation in the parameters measurements irrespective of the number of b values used. Reduced distributions of b values may find use in estimations of IVIM parameters for breast lesions analysis.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the variability of intravoxel incoherent motion measurements acquired from reduced distributions of b values for breast tumors analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The investigations were carried out on twenty-four patients with diagnosed breast tumors. A conventional unenhanced MRI and various IVIM series preset with different distributions of b values (0-1000 s/mm2) were performed. We assessed the variability in Dslow, Dfast, and PF measurements for different distributions of 9 to 4 b values compared with the IVIM metrics for 10 b values using Wilcoxon-Signed rank test. The data was statistically significant at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The results showed no significant variation in the estimations of IVIM parameters in patients. However, the measurements acquired with the combination of 5 b values Showed some variation in Dfast (P = 0.028) compared with 10 b values. The data showed high wCVs in the measurements acquired using the reduced set of 6 b values for Dslow and PF and with the combination of 7 b values for Dfast. There were inconsistencies noticed in the measurements acquired from malignant tumors using reduced distributions of b values (9 b values-4 b values). However, the set of 4 b values displayed the lowest wCVs for both benign and malignant datasets. We also observed unsystematic correlations among different combinations of b values in the categories of IVIM parameters. CONCLUSION: There was no relevant variation in the parameters measurements irrespective of the number of b values used. Reduced distributions of b values may find use in estimations of IVIM parameters for breast lesions analysis.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast neoplasms; Intravoxel incoherent motion; Magnetic resonance imaging
Authors: Anna S Rydhög; Filip Szczepankiewicz; Ronnie Wirestam; André Ahlgren; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Linda Knutsson; Ofer Pasternak Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Kishor Karki; Geoffrey D Hugo; John C Ford; Kathryn M Olsen; Siddharth Saraiya; Robert Groves; Elisabeth Weiss Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 3.609