Literature DB >> 25088463

Age-related differences in short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition in a human hand muscle.

George M Opie1, John G Semmler2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effects of age on the assessment of intracortical inhibition with paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have been variable, which may be due to between-study differences in test TMS intensity and test motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate age-related differences in short- (SICI) and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) across a range of test TMS intensities and test MEP amplitudes.
METHODS: In 22 young and 18 older subjects, SICI and LICI were recorded at a range of test TMS intensities (110%-150% of motor threshold) while the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle was at rest, or producing a precision grip of the index finger and thumb. Data were subsequently compared according to the amplitude of the MEP produced by the test alone TMS.
RESULTS: When pooled across all test TMS intensities, SICI in resting muscle and LICI in active muscle were similar in young and older adults, whereas SICI in active muscle and LICI in resting muscle were reduced in older adults. Regrouping data based on test MEP amplitude demonstrated similar effects of age for SICI and LICI in resting muscle, whereas more subtle differences between age groups were revealed for SICI and LICI in active muscle.
CONCLUSIONS: Advancing age influences GABA-mediated intracortical inhibition, but the outcome is dependent on the experimental conditions. Age-related differences in SICI and LICI were influenced by test TMS intensity and test MEP amplitude, suggesting that these are important considerations when assessing intracortical inhibition in older adults, particularly in an active muscle.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gamma-aminobutyric acid; Motor evoked potential; Muscle activation; Paired-pulse TMS; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25088463     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  17 in total

1.  Individual differences in intracortical inhibition predict motor-inhibitory performance.

Authors:  Jason L He; I Fuelscher; J Coxon; N Chowdhury; Wei-Peng Teo; P Barhoun; P Enticott; C Hyde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Long-interval intracortical inhibition is asymmetric in young but not older adults.

Authors:  A-M Vallence; E Smalley; P D Drummond; G R Hammond
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Age-Related Changes in the Plasticity of Neural Networks Assessed by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With Electromyography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaorong Tang; Peidong Huang; Yitong Li; Juanchao Lan; Zhonghua Yang; Mindong Xu; Wei Yi; Liming Lu; Lin Wang; Nenggui Xu
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 5.505

4.  GABA and primary motor cortex inhibition in young and older adults: a multimodal reliability study.

Authors:  Ronan A Mooney; John Cirillo; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A meta-analysis of the effects of aging on motor cortex neurophysiology assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Apoorva Bhandari; Natasha Radhu; Faranak Farzan; Benoit H Mulsant; Tarek K Rajji; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Daniel M Blumberger
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Proactive modulation of long-interval intracortical inhibition during response inhibition.

Authors:  Matthew J Cowie; Hayley J MacDonald; John Cirillo; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Single joint fatiguing exercise decreases long but not short-interval intracortical inhibition in older adults.

Authors:  Lavender A Otieno; John G Semmler; Simranjit K Sidhu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Cortical inhibition in symptomatic and remitted mania compared to healthy subjects: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Rakshathi Basavaraju; Tarasingh N Sanjay; Urvakhsh M Mehta; Keshavan Muralidharan; Jagadisha Thirthalli
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 6.744

9.  Shoulder position and handedness differentially affect excitability and intracortical inhibition of hand muscles.

Authors:  Shashwati Geed; Megan Grainger; Michelle L Harris-Love; Peter S Lum; Alexander W Dromerick
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Pinging the brain with transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals cortical reactivity in time and space.

Authors:  Sangtae Ahn; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.