Literature DB >> 25087862

Improved learning and memory with theta-burst stimulation of the fornix in rat model of traumatic brain injury.

Jennifer A Sweet1, Katharine C Eakin, Charles N Munyon, Jonathan P Miller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Learning and memory deficits are a source of considerable morbidity after traumatic brain injury (TBI). We investigated the effect of different patterns of hippocampal stimulation via a fornix electrode on cognitively demanding tasks after TBI.
METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent fluid-percussion injury and were compared with sham-operated rats. Electrodes were implanted into the fornix and hippocampus, and stimulation of the fornix produced robust evoked potentials in the hippocampus. A 60-s delayed non-match-to-sample (DNMS) swim T-maze was serially performed using four stimulation patterns: no stimulation (No Stim), low-frequency stimulation (LFS, 5 Hz), high-frequency stimulation (HFS, 130 Hz), and theta-burst stimulation (TBS, 200 Hz in 50 ms trains, five trains per second; 60 µA biphasic pulses). In a separate cohort of sham and injured animals, Morris water maze (MWM) was performed with or without TBS.
RESULTS: In the DNMS swim T-maze, LFS and HFS did not significantly improve performance after TBI. However, there was a significant difference in performance between TBI + No Stim and TBI + TBS groups (P < 0.05) with no significant difference between Sham + No Stim and TBI + TBS. In the MWM, latency in the TBI + TBS group was significantly different from TBI + No Stim starting on day 2 (P < 0.05) and was not different from Sham + No Stim. The TBI + TBS group performed significantly more platform crossings in the probe trial (P < 0.01) and exhibited improved search strategy starting on day 3 (P < 0.05) compared with TBI + No Stim.
CONCLUSIONS: Deficits in learning and memory after TBI are improved with TBS of the hippocampus. HFS and LFS do not appear to produce as great an effect as TBS.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain stimulation; fornix; hippocampus; theta-burst stimulation; traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25087862     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  18 in total

1.  Reply: The challenges for research on deep brain stimulation and memory.

Authors:  Philip S Fastenau; Christopher M Bailey; Jennifer A Sweet; Charles N Munyon; Hans O Lüders; Jonathan P Miller
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 2.  Modulation of Human Memory by Deep Brain Stimulation of the Entorhinal-Hippocampal Circuitry.

Authors:  Emily A Mankin; Itzhak Fried
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  Pathophysiology and Treatment of Memory Dysfunction After Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Rosalia Paterno; Kaitlin A Folweiler; Akiva S Cohen
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  Memory Deficit in an Object Location Task after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Is Associated with Impaired Early Object Exploration and Both Are Restored by Branched Chain Amino Acid Dietary Therapy.

Authors:  Rosalia Paterno; Hannah Metheny; Akiva S Cohen
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Stimulation of the right entorhinal white matter enhances visual memory encoding in humans.

Authors:  Emily A Mankin; Zahra M Aghajan; Peter Schuette; Michelle E Tran; Natalia Tchemodanov; Ali Titiz; Güldamla Kalender; Dawn Eliashiv; John Stern; Shennan A Weiss; Dylan Kirsch; Barbara Knowlton; Itzhak Fried; Nanthia Suthana
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 6.  Hippocampal Neurophysiologic Changes after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Potential Neuromodulation Treatment Approaches.

Authors:  Fady Girgis; Jonathan Pace; Jennifer Sweet; Jonathan P Miller
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-09

7.  A Comparative Study of the Impact of Theta-Burst and High-Frequency Stimulation on Memory Performance.

Authors:  Yating Zhu; Rubin Wang; Yihong Wang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  Enhancing Nervous System Recovery through Neurobiologics, Neural Interface Training, and Neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Max O Krucoff; Shervin Rahimpour; Marc W Slutzky; V Reggie Edgerton; Dennis A Turner
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 9.  Biomarkers and Stimulation Algorithms for Adaptive Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Kimberly B Hoang; Isaac R Cassar; Warren M Grill; Dennis A Turner
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 10.  Making Waves in the Brain: What Are Oscillations, and Why Modulating Them Makes Sense for Brain Injury.

Authors:  Aleksandr Pevzner; Ali Izadi; Darrin J Lee; Kiarash Shahlaie; Gene G Gurkoff
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.