Literature DB >> 25086501

Win-Stay, Lose-Sample: a simple sequential algorithm for approximating Bayesian inference.

Elizabeth Bonawitz1, Stephanie Denison2, Alison Gopnik3, Thomas L Griffiths3.   

Abstract

People can behave in a way that is consistent with Bayesian models of cognition, despite the fact that performing exact Bayesian inference is computationally challenging. What algorithms could people be using to make this possible? We show that a simple sequential algorithm "Win-Stay, Lose-Sample", inspired by the Win-Stay, Lose-Shift (WSLS) principle, can be used to approximate Bayesian inference. We investigate the behavior of adults and preschoolers on two causal learning tasks to test whether people might use a similar algorithm. These studies use a "mini-microgenetic method", investigating how people sequentially update their beliefs as they encounter new evidence. Experiment 1 investigates a deterministic causal learning scenario and Experiments 2 and 3 examine how people make inferences in a stochastic scenario. The behavior of adults and preschoolers in these experiments is consistent with our Bayesian version of the WSLS principle. This algorithm provides both a practical method for performing Bayesian inference and a new way to understand people's judgments.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algorithmic level; Bayesian inference; Causal learning

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25086501     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

1.  Changes in cognitive flexibility and hypothesis search across human life history from childhood to adolescence to adulthood.

Authors:  Alison Gopnik; Shaun O'Grady; Christopher G Lucas; Thomas L Griffiths; Adrienne Wente; Sophie Bridgers; Rosie Aboody; Hoki Fung; Ronald E Dahl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Parameterizing developmental changes in epistemic trust.

Authors:  Baxter S Eaves; Patrick Shafto
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

Review 3.  The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources.

Authors:  Falk Lieder; Thomas L Griffiths; Quentin J M Huys; Noah D Goodman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

4.  Novel names extend for how long preschool children sample visual information.

Authors:  Paulo F Carvalho; Catarina Vales; Caitlin M Fausey; Linda B Smith
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-12-26

5.  Probability Learning: Changes in Behavior Across Time and Development.

Authors:  Rista C Plate; Jacqueline M Fulvio; Kristin Shutts; C Shawn Green; Seth D Pollak
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2017-01-25

Review 6.  Asking the right questions about the psychology of human inquiry: Nine open challenges.

Authors:  Anna Coenen; Jonathan D Nelson; Todd M Gureckis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

7.  Balancing exploration and exploitation with information and randomization.

Authors:  Robert C Wilson; Elizabeth Bonawitz; Vincent D Costa; R Becket Ebitz
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2020-11-06

8.  Assessing human performance during contingency changes and extinction tests in reversal-learning tasks.

Authors:  Carolyn M Ritchey; Shawn P Gilroy; Toshikazu Kuroda; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Context-sensitive valuation and learning.

Authors:  Lindsay E Hunter; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2021-06-09

10.  The Theoretical and Methodological Opportunities Afforded by Guided Play With Young Children.

Authors:  Yue Yu; Patrick Shafto; Elizabeth Bonawitz; Scott C-H Yang; Roberta M Golinkoff; Kathleen H Corriveau; Kathy Hirsh-Pasek; Fei Xu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.