Literature DB >> 25086128

The clinical and radiological evaluation of the use of an allograft-prosthesis composite in the treatment of proximal femoral giant cell tumours.

R Malhotra1, G N Kiran Kumar1, V K Digge1, V Kumar1.   

Abstract

Giant cell tumour is the most common aggressive benign tumour of the musculoskeletal system and has a high rate of local recurrence. When it occurs in proximity to the hip, reconstruction of the joint is a challenge. Options for reconstruction after wide resection include the use of a megaprosthesis or an allograft-prosthesis composite. We performed a clinical and radiological study to evaluate the functional results of a proximal femoral allograft-prosthesis composite in the treatment of proximal femoral giant cell tumour after wide resection. This was an observational study, between 2006 and 2012, of 18 patients with a mean age of 32 years (28 to 42) and a mean follow-up of 54 months (18 to 79). We achieved excellent outcomes using Harris Hip Score in 13 patients and a good outcome in five. All allografts united. There were no complications such as infection, failure, fracture or resorption of the graft, or recurrent tumour. Resection and reconstruction of giant cell tumours with proximal femoral allograft-prosthesis composite is a better option than using a prosthesis considering preservation of bone stock and excellent restoration of function. A good result requires demanding bone banking techniques, effective measures to prevent infection and stability at the allograft-host junction. ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allograft; Giant cell tumour; Harris hip score; Proximal femur

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25086128     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B8.33611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  4 in total

Review 1.  Megaprosthesis versus Allograft Prosthesis Composite for massive skeletal defects.

Authors:  Deepak Gautam; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-09-25

Review 2.  Megaprosthesis Versus Allograft Prosthesis Composite for the Management of Massive Skeletal Defects: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Deepak Gautam; Nitish Arora; Saurabh Gupta; Jaiben George; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-04-17

3.  Pedicle frozen autograft-prosthesis composite reconstructions for malignant bone tumors of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Gang Xu; Shinji Miwa; Norio Yamamoto; Katsuhiro Hayashi; Akihiko Takeuchi; Kentaro Igarashi; Takashi Higuchi; Yuta Taniguchi; Yoshihiro Araki; Hirotaka Yonezawa; Sei Morinaga; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Long-term results of uncemented allograft prosthesis composite reconstruction for the tumor in proximal femur: a minimum follow-up of sixty-five months.

Authors:  Cai Liu; Li Min; Yong Zhou; Yi Luo; Fan Tang; Minxun Lu; Hong Duan; Wenli Zhang; Xinzhu Yu; Chongqi Tu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.