Literature DB >> 33522918

Long-term results of uncemented allograft prosthesis composite reconstruction for the tumor in proximal femur: a minimum follow-up of sixty-five months.

Cai Liu1, Li Min1, Yong Zhou1, Yi Luo1, Fan Tang1, Minxun Lu1, Hong Duan1, Wenli Zhang1, Xinzhu Yu1, Chongqi Tu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Uncemented allograft prosthesis composite (APC) has been applied for tumorous bone defect reconstruction in the proximal femur. However, the long-term results are rarely reported. This study aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes of uncemented APC.
METHODS: Eighteen patients who received uncemented APC reconstruction in the proximal femur after tumor resections were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: The average resection length was 110 mm (80-154) and the average follow-up was 106.7 months (65-141). Bone union achieved in all patients with an average duration of 7.6 months (5-10). The average HHS, MSTS score and gluteus medius strength at one-year follow-up were 88.0 (80-94), 25.2 (22-28) and 4 (3-5), respectively. While at the last follow-up, the HHS, MSTS score and gluteus medius strength were 83.0 (48-100), 24.0 (10-30) and 4 (2-5), respectively. Five intraoperative fractures were fixed with cerclage wires. Two postoperative periprosthetic and prosthetic fractures received a revision. Three local recurrent patients received a secondary surgery. One of these three lung metastatic patients underwent lung metastatic tumor resection. Another two patients were diagnosed with both bone and lung metastases, only one of them underwent amputation. Two greater trochanteric fractures received no treatment. There were10 severe, 3 moderate and 5 mild allograft resorptions without treatment.
CONCLUSION: Uncemented APC is a reliable reconstruction for neoplastic bone defect of the proximal femur, especially for the young patient who expected long-life expectancy and good function. Though allograft resorption and trochanteric fracture are the common complications, they seem no effect on the function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allograft–prosthesis composite; Proximal femur; Tumor; Uncemented

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33522918      PMCID: PMC7849157          DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-03991-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  42 in total

1.  Long-term results of allograft composite total hip prostheses for tumors.

Authors:  F Langlais; J C Lambotte; P Collin; H Thomazeau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Outcome after reconstruction of proximal femoral tumors: A systematic review.

Authors:  Stein J Janssen; David W G Langerhuizen; Joseph H Schwab; Jos A M Bramer
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Proximal femur reconstruction by an allograft prosthesis composite.

Authors:  Davide Donati; Stefano Giacomini; Enrico Gozzi; Mario Mercuri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Proximal femoral allograft-prosthesis composites in revision hip replacement: a 12-year follow-up study.

Authors:  G C Babis; V I Sakellariou; M I O'Connor; A D Hanssen; F H Sim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-03

5.  Evaluation of the allograft-prosthesis composite technique for proximal femoral reconstruction after resection of a primary bone tumour.

Authors:  B M McGoveran; A M Davis; A E Gross; R S Bell
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  The use of large allografts for tumor reconstruction and salvage of the failed total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  S Gitelis; D Heligman; G Quill; P Piasecki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Allograft prosthetic composite arthroplasty for osteosarcoma and other aggressive bone tumors.

Authors:  S Gitelis; P Piasecki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Results of 32 allograft-prosthesis composite reconstructions of the proximal femur.

Authors:  David J Biau; Frédérique Larousserie; Fabrice Thévenin; Sophie Piperno-Neumann; Philippe Anract
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A case of bilateral revision total knee arthroplasty using distal femoral allograft-prosthesis composite and femoral head allografting at the tibial site with a varus-valgus constrained prosthesis: ten-year follow up.

Authors:  Sung-Hyun Lee; Sung-Hyun Noh; Keun-Churl Chun; Joung-Kyue Han; Churl-Hong Chun
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Denosumab chemotherapy for recurrent giant-cell tumor of bone: a case report of neoadjuvant use enabling complete surgical resection.

Authors:  Amit Agarwal; Brandon T Larsen; Lawrence D Buadu; Jack Dunn; Russell Crawford; Jonathan Daniel; Maria C Bishop
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol Med       Date:  2013-07-30
View more
  1 in total

1.  Does Local Zoledronate Applied to Pasteurized Bone Autografts Improve the Likelihood of Union of Graft-Host Junctions after Limb-sparing Surgery?

Authors:  Piya Kiatisevi; Bhasanan Sukanthanak; Pongsiri Piakong; Piyabuth Kittithamvongs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.