Literature DB >> 25085329

Initial evaluation of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nurse Faculty Scholars program.

Kathleen T Hickey1, Eric A Hodges2, Tami L Thomas3, Maren J Coffman4, Ruth E Taylor-Piliae5, Versie M Johnson-Mallard6, Janice H Goodman7, Randy A Jones8, Sandra Kuntz9, Elizabeth Galik10, Michael G Gates11, Jesus M Casida12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nurse Faculty Scholars (RWJF NFS) program was developed to enhance the career trajectory of young nursing faculty and to train the next generation of nurse scholars. Although there are publications that describe the RWJF NFS, no evaluative reports have been published. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the first three cohorts (n = 42 scholars) of the RWJF NFS program.
METHODS: A descriptive research design was used. Data were derived from quarterly and annual reports, and a questionnaire (seven open-ended questions) was administered via Survey Monkey Inc. (Palo Alto, CA, USA).
RESULTS: During their tenure, scholars had on average six to seven articles published, were teaching/mentoring at the graduate level (93%), and holding leadership positions at their academic institutions (100%). Eleven scholars (26%) achieved fellowship in the American Academy of Nursing, one of the highest nursing honors. The average ratings on a Likert scale of 1 (not at all supportive) to 10 (extremely supportive) of whether or not RWJF had helped scholars achieve their goals in teaching, service, research, and leadership were 7.7, 8.0, 9.4, and 9.5, respectively. The majority of scholars reported a positive, supportive relationship with their primary nursing and research mentors; although, several scholars noted challenges in connecting for meetings or telephone calls with their national nursing mentors.
CONCLUSIONS: These initial results of the RWJF NFS program highlight the success of the program in meeting its overall goal-preparing the next generation of nursing academic scholars for leadership in the profession.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early career award; Faculty development; Mentoring

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25085329      PMCID: PMC4252366          DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2014.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Outlook        ISSN: 0029-6554            Impact factor:   3.250


  22 in total

1.  Navigating the course of scholarly productivity: the protégé's role in mentoring.

Authors:  Celia E Wills; Lana Kaiser
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.250

Review 2.  Peer mentoring for tenure-track faculty.

Authors:  Cynthia S Jacelon; Donna M Zucker; Jeanne-Marie Staccarini; Elizabeth A Henneman
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Influencing health policy for older adults: initiatives by the John A. Hartford Centers of Geriatric Nursing Excellence.

Authors:  Charlene Harrington; Claudia J Beverly; Meridean L Maas; Kathleen C Buckwalter; Jill A Bennett; Heather M Young; Julie Sochalski; Mary Naylor
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  Developing geriatric nursing leaders via an annual leadership conference.

Authors:  Angela Barron McBride; Claire M Fagin; Patricia D Franklin; G J Huba; Le Quach
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.250

5.  Preparing nursing faculty for baccalaureate-level and graduate-level nursing programs: role preparation for the academy.

Authors:  Jean E Bartels
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.726

Review 6.  What goes around comes around: improving faculty retention through more effective mentoring.

Authors:  Janne Dunham-Taylor; Cynthia W Lynn; Patricia Moore; Staci McDaniel; Jane K Walker
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.104

7.  Mentoring relationships and the levels of role conflict and role ambiguity experienced by novice nursing faculty.

Authors:  Jennifer A Specht
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 8.  The quality of care. How can it be assessed?

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988 Sep 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Scholarly nursing practice from the perspectives of early-career nurses.

Authors:  Joan M Riley; Judy A Beal
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.250

10.  Facilitating nurse scientist career development: the CANS grant program.

Authors:  Jean F Wyman
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.250

View more
  1 in total

1.  Building a mentoring network.

Authors:  Angela Barron McBride; Jacquelyn Campbell; Nancy Fugate Woods; Spero M Manson
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.250

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.