Timm Cornelius Schott1, Björn Ludwig2. 1. Associate professor, Department of Orthodontics and Orofacial Orthopedics, University Hospital of Dentistry, Oral Medicine, and Maxillofacial Surgery, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany. Electronic address: timm.schott@med.uni-tuebingen.de. 2. Private practice, Traben-Trarbach, Germany; instructor, Department of Orthodontics, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate whether microelectronic wear-time documentation can contribute to individualized orthodontic management. METHODS: The wear times and behaviors of 281 patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with removable appliances were quantified and analyzed using the TheraMon microelectronic system (Sales Agency Gschladt, Hargelsberg, Austria) over a 6-month treatment period. RESULTS: The 281 study participants wore their removable appliances for a median of 9.0 hours per day, compared with the 12 to 15 hours per day prescribed. Wear behavior was variable and heterogeneous in patients with almost identical median wear times, with fluctuating and numerous zero wear-time periods observed. CONCLUSIONS: Both the duration of daily wear time and the wear behavior need to be considered to individualize the prescription for wear time; this is made possible with microelectronic wear-time documentation. Individual prescription changes based on the wear-time documentation can be arranged with patients in a shared decision-making process to achieve effective and successful treatment progress.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate whether microelectronic wear-time documentation can contribute to individualized orthodontic management. METHODS: The wear times and behaviors of 281 patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with removable appliances were quantified and analyzed using the TheraMon microelectronic system (Sales Agency Gschladt, Hargelsberg, Austria) over a 6-month treatment period. RESULTS: The 281 study participants wore their removable appliances for a median of 9.0 hours per day, compared with the 12 to 15 hours per day prescribed. Wear behavior was variable and heterogeneous in patients with almost identical median wear times, with fluctuating and numerous zero wear-time periods observed. CONCLUSIONS: Both the duration of daily wear time and the wear behavior need to be considered to individualize the prescription for wear time; this is made possible with microelectronic wear-time documentation. Individual prescription changes based on the wear-time documentation can be arranged with patients in a shared decision-making process to achieve effective and successful treatment progress.