Literature DB >> 2508473

Cost effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering therapy in The Netherlands. Simvastatin versus cholestyramine.

L L Martens1, F F Rutten, D W Erkelens, C A Ascoop.   

Abstract

Using a model of coronary heart disease incidence based on multivariate logistic regression functions from the Framingham Heart Study, the cost effectiveness of simvastatin was compared with that of cholestyramine in preventing such disease. For men with initial cholesterol levels of 310 mg/dl, the cost effectiveness of cholestyramine, expressed in Dutch guilders, ranges from approximately 220,000 to 510,000 guilders per year of life saved, depending on age at initiation of therapy. For simvastatin, cost-effectiveness ratios range from 50,000 to 110,000 guilders per year of life saved among this group of men. Results are similar for women, although the cost effectiveness of both agents is considerably less. These results suggest that simvastatin is substantially more cost effective than cholestyramine; that it compares well with other generally accepted medical practices, especially if therapy is initiated at an early age; and that simvastatin should become accepted as a drug of first choice in the treatment of persons with elevated serum cholesterol levels as its long-term safety record becomes more established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2508473     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(89)80600-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  12 in total

1.  The 4S study and its pharmacoeconomic implications.

Authors:  J P Reckless
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Effect of biological and analytical variation in cholesterol measurement on the cost-effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering therapy.

Authors:  L L Martens
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Cost-effectiveness of drug therapy for hypercholesterolaemia: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D Thompson; G Oster
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Cost-effectiveness of simvastatin versus cholestyramine: results for Sweden.

Authors:  K Hjalte; B Lindgren; U Persson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Economic evaluations of cholesterol-lowering drugs: a critical and systematic review.

Authors:  Pearl D Gumbs; Monique W M Verschuren; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Ardine G de Wit; Anthonius de Boer; Olaf H Klungel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Cost-effectiveness of statins revisited: lessons learned about the value of innovation.

Authors:  Peter Lindgren; Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-04-29

Review 7.  Simvastatin: a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its cost-effectiveness in hypercholesterolaemia and prevention of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  P Chrisp; N J Lewis; R J Milne
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  The cost effectiveness of diclofenac plus misoprostol compared with diclofenac monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M J Al; B C Michel; F F Rutten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Simvastatin. A reappraisal of its cost effectiveness in dyslipidaemia and coronary heart disease.

Authors:  K L Goa; L B Barradell; D McTavish
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 10.  Cost-effective intervention in stroke.

Authors:  D Dunbabin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.