Literature DB >> 10146941

Simvastatin: a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its cost-effectiveness in hypercholesterolaemia and prevention of coronary heart disease.

P Chrisp1, N J Lewis, R J Milne.   

Abstract

Epidemiological and intervention study results support reduction of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk, and hence direct and indirect costs, by lowering plasma lipids. Cost-effectiveness of a lipid-lowering strategy thus depends significantly on the extent of plasma lipid decrease achieved. The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor simvastatin is a well tolerated and highly effective antihyperlipidaemic agent. Despite a current lack of direct evidence that simvastatin reduces CHD incidence, the cost-effectiveness of the drug {in terms of years of life saved (YOLS)} has been studied, based on findings of epidemiological trials. Simvastatin 20 mg/day is more cost-effective than cholestyramine 4g 3 times daily, particularly in men and in those with a higher pretreatment cholesterol level ( greater than 8 mmol/L) and other risk factors. Cost-effectiveness is also enhanced if treatment is started at a younger age (35 to 45 years) and maintained for a defined period rather than lifelong. Thus, while additional direct comparative studies are needed to confirm this finding, present evidence suggests simvastatin is a cost-effective intervention in appropriately selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 10146941     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199201020-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  96 in total

Review 1.  National Cholesterol Education Program. Scientific rationale.

Authors:  J C LaRosa
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 0.142

2.  The benefits of reducing cholesterol levels: the need to distinguish primary from secondary prevention. 1. A meta-analysis of cholesterol-lowering trials.

Authors:  J S Silberberg; D A Henry
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1991-11-18       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 3.  Hypercholesterolaemia in aged patients. To treat or not to treat?

Authors:  M J Tikkanen; R S Tilvis
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Cost effectiveness of incremental programmes for lowering serum cholesterol concentration: is individual intervention worth while?

Authors:  I S Kristiansen; A E Eggen; D S Thelle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-05-11

Review 5.  Normal and pathological lipoprotein metabolism.

Authors:  G R Thompson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Serum cholesterol, blood pressure, and mortality: implications from a cohort of 361,662 men.

Authors:  M J Martin; S B Hulley; W S Browner; L H Kuller; D Wentworth
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-10-25       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Effects of simvastatin and cholestyramine in familial and nonfamilial hypercholesterolemia. Multicenter Group I.

Authors:  E Stein; R Kreisberg; V Miller; G Mantell; L Washington; D R Shapiro
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-02

8.  Effects of simvastatin and fenofibrate on serum lipoproteins and apolipoproteins in primary hypercholesterolaemia.

Authors:  R Stohler; U Keller; W F Riesen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  Managing elevated blood lipid concentrations. Who, when and how?

Authors:  A M Dart
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Screening for hypercholesterolemia among Canadians: how much will it cost?

Authors:  S A Grover; L Coupal; R Fahkry; S Suissa
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-01-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Cost-effectiveness of drug therapy for hypercholesterolaemia: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D Thompson; G Oster
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals: a European perspective.

Authors:  M Drummond; F Rutten; A Brenna; C G Pinto; B Horisberger; B Jönsson; C Le Pen; J Rovira; M G von der Schulenburg; H Sintonen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Cost-effectiveness of simvastatin versus cholestyramine: results for Sweden.

Authors:  K Hjalte; B Lindgren; U Persson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals: a critical appraisal of seven studies on cholesterol-lowering agents.

Authors:  P Gazzaniga; L Garattini
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Costs of illness in cost-effectiveness analysis. A review of the methodology.

Authors:  T A Hodgson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Fluvastatin: a review of its pharmacology and use in the management of hypercholesterolaemia.

Authors:  G L Plosker; A J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Economic evaluation of cholesterol-related interventions in general practice. An appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  T van der Weijden; J A Knottnerus; A J Ament; H E Stoffers; R P Grol
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 8.  Simvastatin. A reappraisal of its cost effectiveness in dyslipidaemia and coronary heart disease.

Authors:  K L Goa; L B Barradell; D McTavish
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Cost-effectiveness analysis for statin therapies in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease in Italy.

Authors:  P Berto; V Munro; A Gaddi; C Negrini; J Hutton; O Mast
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 10.  Simvastatin. A reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in hypercholesterolaemia.

Authors:  G L Plosker; D McTavish
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.