Literature DB >> 25084000

Interaction of Serum microRNAs and Serum Folate With the Susceptibility to Pancreatic Cancer.

Yao Tian1, Yibo Xue, Gechong Ruan, Kailiang Cheng, Jing Tian, Qian Qiu, Min Xiao, Hui Li, Hong Yang, Li Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether 6 candidate serum miRNAs and their interactions with serum folate level were associated with the risk for pancreatic cancer (PC).
METHOD: A hospital-based case-control study including 74 incident PC cases and 74 controls was conducted. Serum folate and miRNAs were determined by radioimmunoassay and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, respectively. Cell lines AsPC-1 and PANC-1 were used for in vitro study.
RESULTS: MiR-16 was elevated (P = 0.030-0.043) and miR-103 was reduced (P = 0.018-0.020) in PC after adjustment for age, sex, and smoking; however, after additional adjustment for folate, only miR-103 was significantly different between cases and controls (P = 0.010). After converting the relative expression of miRNAs into binary variables and adjusting for age, sex, smoking, and folate, the subjects with low miR-103 or low miR-601 were observed to have a higher risk for PC, with odds ratios of 2.33 (95% confidence interval, 1.06-5.10) and 2.37 (95% confidence interval, 1.07-5.26), respectively. Multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis showed a significant interaction for miR-16, folate, and smoking (cross-validation consistency, 10/10; mean testing accuracy, 0.696; P = 0.013). Interaction between miR-16 and folate was also verified in the AsPC-1 cells.
CONCLUSION: Serum miR-103; miR-601; and interactions among serum miR-16, folate, and smoking are associated with PC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25084000      PMCID: PMC4272228          DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pancreas        ISSN: 0885-3177            Impact factor:   3.327


Pancreatic cancer (PC) ranks fourth among causes of cancer-related deaths in the United States.[1] In China, the adjusted and age-standardized mortality from PC has increased from 1.75 and 2.18 per 100,000 in 1991 to 3.06 and 3.26 per 100,000 in 2000.[2] Pancreatectomy provides the only potential for cure. However, most diagnoses of PC are made in advanced stages that are not suitable for resection, which leads to a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%.[1] Therefore, investigating the etiology and identifying the risk factors for PC are essential for primary disease prevention. As for most human cancers, environmental and genetic factors have been demonstrated to be involved in the carcinogenesis of PC. The progression of PC is paralleled by the successive accumulation of both genetic and epigenetic alterations, including alterations in the expression of microRNA (miRNA) molecules.[3,4] The miRNAs represent a novel class of 18nt to 23nt endogenous small noncoding RNAs. Upon binding to their target mRNAs, they promote posttranscriptional gene silencing by either inhibiting the translation process or cleaving the target mRNAs.[5] Consequently, abnormal expression of miRNAs could have an effect on crucial biological processes in cancer, such as cell cycle progression and apoptosis.[6] In fact, alterations in miRNA expression have been detected in many types of human tumors, including PC. In 2008, intriguing studies revealed that stable miRNAs also could be detected in serum and/or plasma and therefore might serve as diagnostic biomarkers.[7,8] Altered expression of serum miRNAs, including miR-155 and miR-221, has been detected in PC.[9-12] Array analysis has also been used to profile the association of blood miRNA levels with different cancers, and miR-16, miR-320, miR-601, and miR-1228 were shown to be differentially expressed between PC cases and controls (P < 0.0001).[13] The DNA methylation is believed to be one of the most important mechanisms underlying the regulation of miRNA.[14,15] As a cofactor involving the synthesis of S-adenosylmethionine, folate plays an essential role in DNA methylation. Dietary folate deficiency induces hypomethylation, which has been linked to the increased development of cancers, including PC.[16,17] Interestingly, the expression of certain miRNAs, including miR-103 and miR-107, was significantly changed under folate-deficient conditions in human lymphoblastoid cells.[18] Furthermore, expression of many miRNAs in hepatomas induced by folate and methyl-deficient diets was significantly altered compared with that in the livers from age-matched rats on a normal diet.[19] On the basis of these findings, we hypothesized that an association might exist between certain miRNAs and the levels of serum folate in the development of PC. To examine this hypothesis, 6 miRNAs were selected as candidates for investigating the interaction between miRNAs and folate in a PC case-control study of 74 PC patients and 74 controls. Among them, miR-103 and miR-107 have been reported to be differentially regulated by folate deficiency,[18] and miR-16,miR-320, miR-601, and miR-1228 were abnormally expressed in PC cases.[13]

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Subjects

This study consisted of 74 PC patients and 74 cancer-free controls. All subjects were unrelated Han Chinese. Patients were recruited between 2002 and 2004 at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Only histopathologically diagnosed incident patients who underwent intent-to-cure surgery were included, and all blood samples were collected when the patients were admitted to the hospital before surgery. The standard of care of PC in China is postoperative chemoradiotherapy, so there is no biologic difference between resected disease and biopsy-only disease. Cancer-free controls were randomly recruited from the same hospitals during the same period as the patients enrolled and were frequency-matched to the cases on age (±5 years) and sex. Informed consent was obtained from each participant. Questionnaire surveys were conducted to obtain information on demographic data and smoking history.

Ethics Statement

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College.

Blood Samples and Folate Analyses

Whole blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C to completely remove the cellular fraction, and serum was collected. The serum supernatant was stored at −80°C until analysis. Serum folate levels were determined by radioimmunoassay using SimulTRAC-SNB Radioassay kit (ICN Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and all experiments were performed in duplicate. Folate levels of 3.0 ng/mL or greater were considered normal.

Cell Culture

The human pancreatic carcinoma AsPC-1 cell line was purchased from the Cell Resource Center of the Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (Beijing, China); human pancreatic carcinoma PANC-1 cell line was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD). Cells were maintained in standard RPMI-1640 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) or folate-deficient RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% of CO2. Growth medium was supplemented with 10% of fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and 1% of penicillin-streptomycin. To eliminate intracellular folate sources, dialyzed fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) was added to the folate-deficient medium. The cells and cell culture supernatant were harvested after 72 hours using TRIZOL reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) for total RNA isolation. To control for experimental variation in cell culture supernatants, synthetic Caenorhabditis elegans miR-39 (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) was spiked into each cell culture supernatant at a final concentration of 10−4 pmol/μL.

RNA Extraction and Reverse Transcription

The RNA was extracted from 200 μL of serum using TRIZOL reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The concentration and purity of isolated RNA were tested using a Nanodrop ND-1000 (Thermo Scientific, Worcester, MA). An OD260/280 value close to 2.0 indicated high purity of RNA. Total RNA from each sample was diluted to a standard concentration of 20 ng/μL in RNAse-free distilled water, and 3 μl was reverse transcribed to cDNA in a final volume of 10 μl using RevertAid Reverse Transcriptase (Fermentas, Glen Burnie, MD), Recombinant Ribonuclease Inhibitor (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), dNTP mix (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), and stem-loop RT primers (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA).

Validation of Endogenous Reference for Serum miRNA Quantification

The miRNA expression levels from serum samples measured by real-time quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) are typically standardized using stable internal references. Because no universal endogenous references have been identified for serum miRNAs, miR-16, miR-191, and RNU6B were chosen as candidates based on previous studies.[8,9,20] Eight serum samples were randomly selected from patients and controls. The expressions of the target miRNAs and reference miRNAs were detected by qRT-PCR, and the stability of the internal references was verified with NormFinder software (http://www.multid.se/genex/hs410.htm).[21]

Quantification of miRNAs

The miRNA expression was quantified by qRT-PCR with the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) using TaqMan miRNA probes (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manual. The reactions were initiated in a 96-well optical plate at 95°C for 5 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 1 minute. The cycle threshold (Ct) was defined as the number of cycles required for the fluorescent signal to cross the threshold in qPCR. The relative expression levels of target miRNAs were expressed as ΔCt (ΔCt = Ctinternal reference − Cttarget miRNA).[22] Reaction specificity was verified by including a no-template control in all experiments.

Statistical Analysis

Differences in the distribution of demographic characteristics were evaluated by a Student t test or χ2 test between cases and controls as appropriate. The Student t test was used to compare the differences in serum miRNA levels between PC patients and controls, the differences in miRNA levels between standard cell culture and folate-deficient cell culture, and the differential expression of miRNAs between standard and folate-deficient cell culture supernatant. Analysis of covariance was used to adjust age, sex, smoking, and serum folate status. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Expression levels of each miRNA were classified into normal and abnormal expressions (dichotomous outcome) according to each 95% confidence interval (CI) of miRNA expression levels in control subjects. The upper limit of the CIs for the miRNAs was set as a cutoff point above which the miRNA was overexpressed. Conversely, the lower limit of the CI was set as a cutoff point for underexpression. The Pearson χ2 test was performed to determine whether there were significant differences in serum miRNA levels between patients and healthy controls. The associations between miRNA expression levels and PC risk were estimated by the odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% CIs using multivariate logistic regression analysis to adjust for age, sex, smoking, and serum folate status. The potential miRNA-folate interactions were tested by a multiplicative model, an additive model, and the multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) method. A multiple logistic regression model was used to detect the potential multiplicative interactions, and the log likelihood ratio test was used to assess whether the model was significantly improved by adding an additional interaction (product) term.[23] To test for additive interactions, 3 indexes were calculated using an R-program[24] (Vienna, Austria): relative excess risk due to interaction, the attributable proportion due to interaction, and the synergy index (SI). The MDR, a nonparametric, model-free approach by MDR software (version 2.0, beta 8), and MDR permutation testing software (version 1.0, beta 2) were applied to identify possible high-order interactions associated with PC risk.[25] The best candidate interaction model was selected according to testing accuracy and cross-validation consistency (CVC). Validation was derived empirically from permutation tests, which were considered statistically significant at the 0.05 level. All the variables identified in the best model by the MDR software were combined, and their ORs and 95% CIs in relation to PC risk were calculated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Statistical analyses were performed with Statistical Analysis System software (version 9.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC), except for additive interaction analysis and MDR analysis.

RESULTS

Demographic Characteristics of the Study Population

To determine whether an association exists between miRNA expression and PC, as well as a potential interaction between miRNAs and serum folate in PC, we assembled 74 PC patients and 74 sex-/age-matched control subjects. Demographic characteristics of study subjects were summarized in Table 1. There were no significant differences in the distribution of age and sex between the cases and controls. Among the study subjects, 59.5% of cases and 50% of controls were men, with a mean (SD) age of 62.1 (9.3) and 60.2 (10.4), respectively. More cases reported a smoking history than the controls (50% vs 31%, P = 0.019). Furthermore, examination of the serum folate demonstrated that levels for the cases were significantly lower than the controls (5.1 [2.5] vs 3.3 [0.8], P < 0.0001). These findings supported previous studies demonstrating that PC was associated with both an increased incidence of smoking and reduced folate levels.[26]
TABLE 1

Distribution of Select Characteristics Among PC Patients and Controls

Distribution of Select Characteristics Among PC Patients and Controls

Validation of miR-191 as an Endogenous Reference for Quantification

To select an endogenous reference for the quantification of serum miRNAs, we examined 3 candidates (RNU6B, miR-16, and miR-191) using qRT-PCR of 16 randomly selected serum samples (8 healthy individuals and 8 PC patients). Data analysis with NormFinder yielded values of 0.352, 0.220, and 0.165 for RNU6B, miR-16, and miR-191, respectively. The arbitrary cutoff within NormFinder was 0.4, which suggested that all of these expression values were stable; however, the most stably expressed among the 3 candidates was miR-191, and thus, it was selected as an optimal reference for qRT-PCR.

Differential Expression of Serum miRNAs Among PC Patients and Controls

The 6 miRNAs were measured in the 148 serum samples (74 cases and 74 controls) relative to miR-191 expression. The mean (SD) expression of miR-16 among the cases was 3.95 (1.98), which was significantly higher than that in controls (3.26 [1.83]) (P = 0.030). Conversely, the expression of miR-103 in the cases was −1.92 (0.97), which was significantly lower than that in controls (−1.41 [1.56]) (P = 0.018). No significant differences between the 2 groups were observed for the other miRNAs (Table 2, first 3 columns). After adjusting for age, sex, and smoking status, consistent results were observed (Table 2, column P†). However, after adjusting for these 3 variables and serum folate status, a significance difference was observed only in miR-103 (P = 0.010) (Table 2, column P‡).
TABLE 2

Serum Expression Levels of 6 miRNAs

Serum Expression Levels of 6 miRNAs To further investigate the association between differential miRNA expression and PC, miRNAs were classified into normal or abnormal expression according to 95% CIs of miRNA expression levels of control subjects. The results confirmed that high miR-16 expression and low miR-103 expression were associated with significantly increased risk for PC after adjustment for age, sex and smoking status, with ORs of 2.07 (95% CI, 1.04–4.11) and 2.18 (95% CI, 1.10–4.32), respectively. However, after additionally adjusting for serum folate status, low expressions of miR-103 and miR-601 (but not high miR-16 expression) were associated with significantly increased risk for PC, with ORs of 2.33 (95% CI, 1.06–5.10) and 2.37 (95% CI, 1.07–5.26), respectively (Table 3). These results indicated that elevated miR-16 concomitant with decreased folate levels might increase the risk for PC, that reduced miR-103 expression was predictive of PC regardless of the folate status, and that miR-601was a risk factor for PC when considered in relation to folate status.
TABLE 3

Effect of the 6 miRNAs and PC

Effect of the 6 miRNAs and PC

Assessment of the Interaction Between Serum miRNAs and Folate Expression With PC by Multiplicative Interaction Analysis, Additive Interaction Analysis, and MDR Analysis

To further understand the relationship between miRNA expression, folate status, and PC, we assessed the miRNA and folate expression data by multiplicative interaction analysis, additive interaction analysis, and MDR analysis. For the multiplicative interaction analysis, a likelihood ratio test was used to assess whether the multiplicative interaction term for miRNA and folate could improve the logistic model. However, no multiplicative or additive interactions between miRNAs and folate were observed (Table 4).
TABLE 4

Additive Interaction Analysis of Serum miRNA-Folate

Additive Interaction Analysis of Serum miRNA-Folate Next, MDR analysis was used to identify potential high-dimensional interactions between serum miRNAs and folate (Table 5). The best interaction model by MDR analysis was the 3-factor model consisting of miR-16, folate, and smoking (testing accuracy, 0.696; CVC, 10/10; permutation P = 0.013). The 3 factors identified in the model were combined according to the MDR software, and individuals carrying the combined risk stratum had a 4.06-fold increase for PC (95% CI, 1.24–13.26).
TABLE 5

Interaction Models by MDR Analysis

Interaction Models by MDR Analysis

Effects of Folate Deprivation on miRNA Expression in AsPC-1 Cells and Cell Culture Supernatant

Serum miRNAs that were differentially regulated in PC patients were likely to have originated from the pancreas, and therefore, we examined miRNA levels after folate deprivation in pancreatic carcinoma AsPC-1 and PANC-1 cells lines and their cell culture supernatant. The RNA was isolated from these 2 cell lines and cell culture supernatants after 72-hour culture in folate-deprived medium. The expression levels of miR-16, miR-103, and miR-601 were measured. The miR-16 was significantly up-regulated both in the folate-deprived AsPC-1 cell line (P < 0.001) and the culture supernatant of the folate-deprived AsPC-1 cell line (P = 0.004) (Fig. 1). Moreover, the high expression of miR-16 was also confirmed in folate-deprived PANC-1 cell line (P = 0.008), although no statistically significant difference of miR-16 was observed in the cell culture supernatant (Fig. 1). These findings verified that miR-16 could be regulated in human PC cells by folate deprivation.
FIGURE 1

MiR-16 expression in PC cell lines and their culture supernatants. The expression level of miR-16 in PC cell lines and cell supernatants was assayed following 72-hour culture in normal medium (control) or folate-deficient medium (FD). Values were standardized to U6 or cel-miR-39 and normalized to 1 in the control cells. The mean (SD) from 3 biologically independent experiments is shown. *P < 0.001, **P = 0.004, ***P = 0.008. A, AsPC cell. B, AsPC cell supernatant. C, PANC-1 cell. D, PANC-1 cell supernatant.

MiR-16 expression in PC cell lines and their culture supernatants. The expression level of miR-16 in PC cell lines and cell supernatants was assayed following 72-hour culture in normal medium (control) or folate-deficient medium (FD). Values were standardized to U6 or cel-miR-39 and normalized to 1 in the control cells. The mean (SD) from 3 biologically independent experiments is shown. *P < 0.001, **P = 0.004, ***P = 0.008. A, AsPC cell. B, AsPC cell supernatant. C, PANC-1 cell. D, PANC-1 cell supernatant.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we explore whether an association exists between miRNAs and folate in PC. Because there were some debates over the optimal choice of an endogenous control for the detection of serum miRNAs, we first assessed 3 candidates to identify a suitable internal control in PC. The results revealed that miR-191 was the optimal endogenous control for the detection of serum miRNAs, which was consistent with a previous study.[20] Within a cohort of 74 PC patients and 74 controls, we found that the subjects with high expression of miR-16 or low expression of miR-103 had a higher risk for PC after adjusting for age, sex, and smoking status with ORs of 2.07 (95% CI, 1.04–4.11) and 2.18 (95% CI, 1.10–4.32), respectively. However, the higher risk for PC could not be predicted for miR-16 after additional adjustment for folate status. Furthermore, subjects with low expression of miR-601 had a higher risk for PC with an OR of 2.37 (95% CI, 1.07–5.26), after adjusting age, sex, smoking, and serum folate status. The MDR analysis showed a significant interaction among miR-16, folate, and smoking status. We also demonstrated that, for cultured AsPC cells, miR-16 was significantly up-regulated in cell lysates and in cell culture supernatant after 72-hour growth in folate-deficient medium. In addition, a high level of miR-16 was observed in folate-deprived PANC-1 cell line. Our identification of a role for miR-16 in PC is in accordance with other studies showing that high expression of miR-16 is associated with PC. Several studies found that miR-16 was overexpressed in PC tissues.[12,27] The expression of miR-16 in PC patient serum was also higher than in controls.[28] Functional studies showed that overexpression of miR-16 could reduce the survival of dendritic cells and thus diminish immune responses, which led to immune escape and limitless proliferation of cancer cells.[29] The miR-16 targeted the silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor and promoted nuclear factor-κB–regulated transactivation of the IL-8 gene, which played an important role in tumorigenesis and metastasis of various cancers including PC.[30-32] After adjusting for age, sex, smoking, and serum folate status, the risk for high expression of miR-16 was not observed, which indicated an association between miR-16 and serum folate. This association was also supported by the MDR analysis and by the in vitro studies of folate deprivation in PC cell lines. In both PC cell lines, the expression of miR-16 was increased under a folate deprivation condition; it did indicate that low folate might play a role in the regulation of miR-16 expression. In cell culture supernatants, there were no consistent results from the 2 cell lines, and the disparity might be attributed to different mechanisms of RNA secretion in complicated cell-cell communications. The mechanism of miRNAs and folate is likely to involve effects on DNA methylation. Low expression of miR-16 in tumor tissue was associated with the methylation of DNA,[33] and miR-16 increased when DNA methylation was inhibited.[34] The most important biological function of folate is to provide a substrate for DNA methylation in the form of tetrahydrofolate. Thus, folate deficiency usually leads to whole genome dysregulation of methylation and abrogates the expression of some important tumor suppressors, including miRNAs, which ultimately may lead to tumorgenesis.[35-38] Epidemiologic studies also indicated that folate deficiency was highly related to the risk for PC.[16] In vitro and in vivo experiments showed that folate deficiency led to the dysregulation of miRNAs in both cancer cells and tumor tissues.[18,19] In addition to folate deficiency, cigarette smoke could contribute to the alterations in miRNA expression.[39] Nicotine had been shown to up-regulate miR-16 and miR-21.[40] Furthermore, upon exposure to environmental cigarette smoke for 28 days, 26% of the miRNAs tested, most of which were involved in the proliferation and apoptosis of cancer cells, were up-regulated in the lungs of rats.[41] Interestingly, cigarette smoke could result in a decrease of folate in serum.[42] So, to identify the association between serum folate, miR-16, and PC without an effect of smoking status, we further analyzed the association between miR-16, folate, and PC among nonsmokers (data not shown) and found a potential additive interaction effect of folate deficiency and up-regulated miR-16 (SI [95% CI], 1.88 [−0.26 to 4.01]). In all, the abovementioned collective evidence suggested that miR-16 and folate deficiency might contribute to the progression of PC. Our results also indicated that subjects with low expression of miR-103 had a higher risk for PC after adjusting for age, sex, smoking, and folate status. Recent studies also have supported an essential role for miR-103 in the development of various cancers as a tumor suppressor gene. For example, miR-103 could inhibit the proliferation and migration of nonsmall lung cancer cells by targeting the 3′ UTR of protein kinase C-ε.[43] In addition, overexpression of miR-103 in neuroblastoma cells reduced proliferation and promoted differentiation by targeting the inhibitor of DNA binding-2, suggesting that its alteration might be involved in neural cancer development.[44] After adjusting for age, sex, smoking, and folate status, the subjects with low expression of miR-601 were also observed to have a higher risk for PC. Although abnormal expression of miR-601 had not been reported in other PC studies, the expression of miR-601 had been shown to be reduced in the serum of colorectal cancer patients.[45] The precise mechanisms needed further investigations, given that miR-601 can regulate multiple signaling pathways.[46] The role of serum miRNAs as mediators in cell-cell communication is needed to be explored further. Studies have shown that serum miRNAs might be attributed to a complicated origin, including cancer cells, satellite cells, immune cells, endothelial cells, and so on.[47] As one of the heterogeneous tumors, PC also consists of these types of cells,[48] and it is essential to keep its intercellular communication. Serum miRNAs might play a role of cell-cell communication.[49] Actually, miRNAs are stable against RNase in serum, although the mechanism still remains poorly elucidated. Several studies have identified that miRNAs could be packaged in microvesicles, exosomes, apoptotic bodies, Argonaute 2 (Ago2) complexes, and high-density lipoproteins.[50-54] The miR-16 has been found partly bound to Ago2 in plasma and serum human samples, and the combination might facilitate a high stability of the miRNA-Ago2 complex.[53] The mir-16 we detected in cell culture supernatant might be secreted by AsPC-1 cells as these forms. Furthermore, studies have suggested that serum miRNAs could be delivered to recipient cells and play a role in new cells.[54,55] Therefore, further researches on the field may provide more valuable findings. In conclusion, the interaction of abnormal serum miRNA and folate seems to positively correlate with increased risk for PC, suggesting a role for folic acid supplementation in PC. Expanded cohort studies and additional experimental evidences may elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms for this association.
  55 in total

Review 1.  Circulating microRNAs: new biomarkers in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer (review).

Authors:  Alessandro Allegra; Andrea Alonci; Salvatore Campo; Giuseppa Penna; Annamaria Petrungaro; Demetrio Gerace; Caterina Musolino
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 5.650

2.  The silencing of microRNA 148a production by DNA hypermethylation is an early event in pancreatic carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Naïma Hanoun; Yannick Delpu; Arief A Suriawinata; Barbara Bournet; Christophe Bureau; Janick Selves; Gregory J Tsongalis; Marlène Dufresne; Louis Buscail; Pierre Cordelier; Jérôme Torrisani
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 3.  Folate in smokers.

Authors:  Kenji Okumura; Hideto Tsukamoto
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.786

4.  NF-κB targets miR-16 and miR-21 in gastric cancer: involvement of prostaglandin E receptors.

Authors:  Vivian Y Shin; Hongchuan Jin; Enders K O Ng; Alfred S L Cheng; Wilson W S Chong; Christine Y P Wong; Wai K Leung; Joseph J Y Sung; Kent-Man Chu
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  MicroRNA responses to cellular stress.

Authors:  Carmen J Marsit; Karen Eddy; Karl T Kelsey
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  MicroRNA expression patterns to differentiate pancreatic adenocarcinoma from normal pancreas and chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Mark Bloomston; Wendy L Frankel; Fabio Petrocca; Stefano Volinia; Hansjuerg Alder; John P Hagan; Chang-Gong Liu; Darshna Bhatt; Cristian Taccioli; Carlo M Croce
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Epigenetic silencing of microRNA-34b/c and B-cell translocation gene 4 is associated with CpG island methylation in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Minoru Toyota; Hiromu Suzuki; Yasushi Sasaki; Reo Maruyama; Kohzoh Imai; Yasuhisa Shinomura; Takashi Tokino
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  MicroRNAs are transported in plasma and delivered to recipient cells by high-density lipoproteins.

Authors:  Kasey C Vickers; Brian T Palmisano; Bassem M Shoucri; Robert D Shamburek; Alan T Remaley
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-03-20       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  Discovery pipeline for epigenetically deregulated miRNAs in cancer: integration of primary miRNA transcription.

Authors:  Toby Hulf; Tennille Sibbritt; Erik D Wiklund; Saul Bert; Dario Strbenac; Aaron L Statham; Mark D Robinson; Susan J Clark
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Influence of diet and tobacco smoking on pancreatic cancer incidence in poland in 1960-2008.

Authors:  Mirosław Jarosz; Włodzimierz Sekuła; Ewa Rychlik
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 2.260

View more
  5 in total

1.  The potential of plasma miRNAs for diagnosis and risk estimation of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Wang-Yang Chen; Xiao-Juan Zhao; Zhi-Fu Yu; Fu-Lan Hu; Yu-Peng Liu; Bin-Bin Cui; Xin-Shu Dong; Ya-Shuang Zhao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 2.  MicroRNAs as biomarkers and prospective therapeutic targets in colon and pancreatic cancers.

Authors:  Ganji Purnachandra Nagaraju; Appiya Santharam Madanraj; Sheik Aliya; Balney Rajitha; Olatunji Boladale Alese; Ekamber Kariali; Afroz Alam; Bassel F El-Rayes
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-11-04

3.  MicroRNA‑103 modulates tumor progression by targeting KLF7 in non‑small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ke Li; Conghu Yuan
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.101

4.  MicroRNA16 regulates glioma cell proliferation, apoptosis and invasion by targeting Wip1-ATM-p53 feedback loop.

Authors:  Xiao-Hong Zhan; Qiu-Yan Xu; Rui Tian; Hong Yan; Min Zhang; Jing Wu; Wei Wang; Jie He
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-16

5.  A panel of 13-miRNA signature as a potential biomarker for predicting survival in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Xin Zhou; Zebo Huang; Lei Xu; Mingxia Zhu; Lan Zhang; Huo Zhang; Xiaping Wang; Hai Li; Wei Zhu; Yongqian Shu; Ping Liu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.