Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically improved the outcome of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Besides inhibiting target kinases in leukemic cells, 2nd generation TKI dasatinib also inhibits off-targets in immune effector cells resulting in atypical immune responses in some patients. Dasatinib has been described to increase the proportion of late effector memory T-cells, however, to date no follow-up studies have been performed in first-line patients. In this study, we explored the functional properties of T-cells using primary samples from CML patients (n = 28) on TKI therapy. Granzyme B (GrB) was used as a marker for late phase antigen experienced CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells. Dasatinib treatment increased the numbers of both GrB expressing memory CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells when compared with healthy controls. Functionally, the GrB+CD4+ T-cells were highly active and differentiated into Th1-type T-cells capable of producing IFN-γ, which is important for tumor control. Similar kind of increase was not observed during imatinib or nilotinib therapy. These data support the dual mode of action of dasatinib: potent BCR-ABL1 inhibition in leukemic cells is accompanied by the enhancement of cellular immunity, which may have implications in the long-term control of leukemia.
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically improved the outcome of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Besides inhibiting target kinases in leukemic cells, 2nd generation TKI dasatinib also inhibits off-targets in immune effector cells resulting in atypical immune responses in some patients. Dasatinib has been described to increase the proportion of late effector memory T-cells, however, to date no follow-up studies have been performed in first-line patients. In this study, we explored the functional properties of T-cells using primary samples from CMLpatients (n = 28) on TKI therapy. Granzyme B (GrB) was used as a marker for late phase antigen experienced CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells. Dasatinib treatment increased the numbers of both GrB expressing memory CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells when compared with healthy controls. Functionally, the GrB+CD4+ T-cells were highly active and differentiated into Th1-type T-cells capable of producing IFN-γ, which is important for tumor control. Similar kind of increase was not observed during imatinib or nilotinib therapy. These data support the dual mode of action of dasatinib: potent BCR-ABL1 inhibition in leukemic cells is accompanied by the enhancement of cellular immunity, which may have implications in the long-term control of leukemia.
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a hematopoietic stem cell disorder caused by cells carrying a Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome. The Ph chromosome is a result of a translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22, forming a fusion oncogene BCR-ABL1. The oncogene results in a deregulated tyrosine kinase activity, leading to impaired apoptosis and uncontrolled proliferation causing Ph positive (Ph+) leukemias such as CML. The invention of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has significantly improved the therapy outcome of CML. The first generation TKI imatinib (Glivec/Gleevec; Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) is proven to be relatively safe and result in excellent therapy responses. However, a proportion of imatinib-treated CMLpatients will eventually develop resistant mutations or become intolerant. In addition, imatinib is not effective in the treatment of advanced phases of CML or Ph+ acute lymphocytic leukemia. Therefore, second generation TKIs such as dasatinib (Sprycel; Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, NY, USA) and nilotinib (Tasigna; Novartis) have replaced imatinib in poorly responding patients resulting in improved outcomes.- Furthermore, recent clinical trials have shown that newly diagnosed CMLpatients treated with dasatinib or nilotinib achieve earlier deeper molecular responses than patients on imatinib therapy and progress more rarely.,It is not entirely clear why dasatinib-treated CMLpatients respond faster to the treatment than imatinib-treated patients, but probably at least the increased inhibition of the oncogenic tyrosine kinaseBCR-ABL, plays a role. In addition, dasatinib may have a more profound effect on the leukemic stem and progenitor cell pool as has previously been demonstrated in newly diagnosed CMLpatients. However, other mechanisms, such as the wide kinase-inhibition profile of dasatinib, could be involved. In addition to the main target BCR-ABL, dasatinib also inhibits a wide variety of kinases such as src, tec, syk and gck-families that are essential for the function of the immune system.- Therefore, it is reasonable to believe that dasatinib may cause modifications in the immune system. It has previously been shown that dasatinib-treated CMLpatients display diverse T-cell populations when compared with imatinib-treated CMLpatients, but these studies have mainly been done in second-line dasatinib treated patients who have received several lines of therapy (such as imatinib, interferon or even stem cell transplantation) prior to dasatinib start. In addition, the evolution and function of these cells has not been described during the therapy. Therefore, our aim was to study the changes in the T-cell phenotype and function in chronic phase CMLpatients during the first line treatment of dasatinib, imatinib and nilotinib in order to understand the role of immune system in the therapy responses.
Results
CML patients have increased proportion of granzyme B expressing T-cells at diagnosis, which is further increased by dasatinib therapy
At diagnosis, CMLpatients had a higher proportion of Granzyme B positive (GrB+) CD4+ T-cells (median 3.6%) although the difference was not statistically significant when compared with healthy controls (median 0.8%, P = 0.08; Fig. 1A). Similarly, the relative amount of GrB+CD8+ T-cells was increased in untreated CMLpatients (median 38.0% vs. 11.0% in healthy controls, P = 0.028) (Fig. 1B). After 6 mo of therapy, imatinib- and nilotinib-treated patients had a lower percentage of GrB+CD4+ T-cells when compared with dasatinib-treated patients (P = 0.0067; Fig. 1C). Moreover, the percentage of GrB+CD8+ T-cells was higher in dasatinib-treated patients (P = 0.086; Fig. 1D). Similarly, when absolute numbers of GrB+CD4+ and GrB+CD8+ T-cells were calculated, they were markedly higher in dasatinib treated patients, when compared with patients on imatinib or nilotinib treatment (0.54 × 106/ml vs. 0.01 × 106/ml and 0.09 × 106/ml, P = 0.0253 and 1.19 × 106/ml vs. 0.24 × 106/ml and 0.16 × 106/ml, P = 0.0439, respectively, Fig. 1E and F).
Figure 1. The proportion of granzyme B positive (GrB+) T-cells is increased in CML patients at diagnosis and further expands during dasatinib therapy. Fresh or frozen PBMNCs were first stained for surface markers (α-CD45, α-CD3, α-CD4 and α-CD8), and after fixation and permeabilization intracellular GrB was stained, and cells were analyzed with flow cytometry. (A) The relative proportions of GrB+CD4+ T-cells and (B) GrB+CD8+ T-cells in samples obtained from healthy controls (n = 5) and CML patients at diagnosis (dg) (n = 18). (C) The proportion of GrB+CD4+ T-cells and (D) GrB+CD8+ T-cells 6 mo after start on dasatinib (DA, n = 7), imatinib (IM, n = 6), or nilotinib (NI, n = 6) therapy. The absolute number of GrB+CD4+ (E) and GrB+CD8+ T-cells (F) was measured in CML patients 6 mo after the start of DA (n = 8), IM (n = 6), or NI (n = 5) therapy. Panels A and B were analyzed by nonparametric Mann Whitney t test and panels C, D and E by 1way ANOVA.
Figure 1. The proportion of granzyme B positive (GrB+) T-cells is increased in CMLpatients at diagnosis and further expands during dasatinib therapy. Fresh or frozen PBMNCs were first stained for surface markers (α-CD45, α-CD3, α-CD4 and α-CD8), and after fixation and permeabilization intracellular GrB was stained, and cells were analyzed with flow cytometry. (A) The relative proportions of GrB+CD4+ T-cells and (B) GrB+CD8+ T-cells in samples obtained from healthy controls (n = 5) and CMLpatients at diagnosis (dg) (n = 18). (C) The proportion of GrB+CD4+ T-cells and (D) GrB+CD8+ T-cells 6 mo after start on dasatinib (DA, n = 7), imatinib (IM, n = 6), or nilotinib (NI, n = 6) therapy. The absolute number of GrB+CD4+ (E) and GrB+CD8+ T-cells (F) was measured in CMLpatients 6 mo after the start of DA (n = 8), IM (n = 6), or NI (n = 5) therapy. Panels A and B were analyzed by nonparametric Mann Whitney t test and panels C, D and E by 1way ANOVA.
Dasatinib-treated CML patients have a higher proportion of effector CD4+ T-cells
The memory cell subsets of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells were studied in healthy, untreated CMLpatients, and in patients who had been treated for over 12 mo with dasatinib, imatinib, or nilotinib. These groups had significant differences in the proportions of the different CD4+ T-cell memory subsets; naïve (CCR7+CD45RA+, P = 0.04; Fig. 2A), central memory (CCR7+CD45RA-; P = 0.0008; Fig. 2B), CD45RA+ effector memory (CCR7-CD45RA+; P = 0.01; Fig. 2C), and effector memory (CCR7-CD45RA-, P = 0.07) CD4+ T-cells. In particular, dasatinib-treated patients had increased proportion of CD45RA+ effector memory CD4+ T-cells when compared with untreated patients (P = 0.07) and imatinib-treated patients (P = 0.017). In addition, dasatinib-treated patients had a trend of higher percentage of effector memory CD4+ T-cells when compared with nilotinib-treated patients (P = 0.052) and healthy (P = 0.07). No differences were observed between the different TKI treated patients regarding the maturation state of CD8+ T-cells (Fig. 2E–H), although there was a trend for increased amount of terminal effector memory cells (TEMRA) in dasatinibpatients (Fig. 2F).
Figure 2. Patients treated with dasatinib have increased proportions of memory CD4+ T-cells. The memory cell subsets of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells were examined by staining the fresh or frozen PBMNCs with α-CD45, α-CD3, α-CD4-, α-CD45RA and α-CCR7-PE antibodies after which they were analyzed by flow cytometry. The proportion of (A) naïve (CCR7+CD45RA+), (B) CD45RA+ effector memory (TEMRA, CCR7negCD45RA+) (C) central memory (TCM, CCR7+CD45RAneg) and (D) effector memory TEM (CCR7negCD45RAneg) CD4+ T-cells from the whole CD4+ T-cell population was measured from healthy (n = 7), untreated CML patients (n = 9) and patients treated with dasatinib (DA, n = 6), imatinib (IM, n = 5) or nilotinib (NI, n = 5) at least 12 mo after start of treatment. Same analysis was performed on CD8+ T-cells (E–H). Statistical analyses in all panels were done by 1way ANOVA.
Figure 2. Patients treated with dasatinib have increased proportions of memory CD4+ T-cells. The memory cell subsets of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells were examined by staining the fresh or frozen PBMNCs with α-CD45, α-CD3, α-CD4-, α-CD45RA and α-CCR7-PE antibodies after which they were analyzed by flow cytometry. The proportion of (A) naïve (CCR7+CD45RA+), (B) CD45RA+ effector memory (TEMRA, CCR7negCD45RA+) (C) central memory (TCM, CCR7+CD45RAneg) and (D) effector memory TEM (CCR7negCD45RAneg) CD4+ T-cells from the whole CD4+ T-cell population was measured from healthy (n = 7), untreated CMLpatients (n = 9) and patients treated with dasatinib (DA, n = 6), imatinib (IM, n = 5) or nilotinib (NI, n = 5) at least 12 mo after start of treatment. Same analysis was performed on CD8+ T-cells (E–H). Statistical analyses in all panels were done by 1way ANOVA.
Dasatinib therapy differentiates T-cells for Th1-type cytokine production
To study the function of GrB+ T-cells in dasatinib-treated patients, Th1-type cytokine production (TNF-α and IFN-γ) was measured by flow cytometry. Samples were collected from patients who had been on dasatinib therapy for 6–72 mo (median 30 mo), on imatinib for 12–30 mo (median 27), or on nilotinib for 6–42 mo (median 9 mo).In unstimulated samples collected in the morning before the patient had taken the drug (12 or 24h after last capsule), no significant amount of cytokine production by T-cells was observed (Fig. 3A, upper panels). In stimulated samples (Fig. 3A, lower panels) 13.7% of the GrB+ T-cells in dasatinib-treated patients produced TNF-α and IFN-γ (median value of 9 patients, range 4.1–38.2%) whereas only 2.5% of GrBneg T-cells produced these cytokines (median value of 9 patients, range 0.9–4.2%). The GrB+ T-cells were the major cytokine producers and accounted for more than 90% of all cytokine-producing T-cells. When studied separately, both GrB+CD4+ and GrB+CD8+ T-cells produced cytokines (Fig. 3B). In healthy volunteers (n = 5, median 5.0%, range 3.2–7.8%), imatinib- (n = 4, median 2.4%, range 1.1–6.4%) and nilotinib- (n = 6, median 5.5%, range 4.4–22.7%) treated patients the GrB+ T-cells were significantly less active Th1-type cytokine producers compared with same cells in dasatinib-treated patients (P = 0.0145).
Figure 3. Granzyme B (GrB+) positive T-cells in dasatinib-treated CML patients are sensitized to produce Th1-type cytokines upon stimulation. Fresh PBMNCs were stimulated with OKT3 and co-stimulatory molecules (α-CD28 and α-CD49d) for 6 h in the presence of Golgi STOP. After the stimulation, Th1-type cytokine (TNF-α and IFN-γ) production in T-cells was measured by flow cytometry. Panel (A) presents representative cases showing one healthy volunteer, one dasatinib-treated patient (patient nr 7 in Table 1), one imatinib-treated patient (patient nr 15), and one nilotinib-treated patient (patient nr 17). Each plot shows 20 000 events. (B) Cytokine production by GrB+CD4+ and GrB+CD8+ T-cells in a representative dasatinib-treated patient (patient nr 7 in Table 1). (C) The percentage of cytokine-producing GrB+ T-cells in healthy volunteers (n = 5) and patients treated with dasatinib (DA, n = 9), imatinib (IM, n = 4) or nilotinib (NI, n = 6) were compared by 1way ANOVA.
Figure 3. Granzyme B (GrB+) positive T-cells in dasatinib-treated CMLpatients are sensitized to produce Th1-type cytokines upon stimulation. Fresh PBMNCs were stimulated with OKT3 and co-stimulatory molecules (α-CD28 and α-CD49d) for 6 h in the presence of Golgi STOP. After the stimulation, Th1-type cytokine (TNF-α and IFN-γ) production in T-cells was measured by flow cytometry. Panel (A) presents representative cases showing one healthy volunteer, one dasatinib-treated patient (patient nr 7 in Table 1), one imatinib-treated patient (patient nr 15), and one nilotinib-treated patient (patient nr 17). Each plot shows 20 000 events. (B) Cytokine production by GrB+CD4+ and GrB+CD8+ T-cells in a representative dasatinib-treated patient (patient nr 7 in Table 1). (C) The percentage of cytokine-producing GrB+ T-cells in healthy volunteers (n = 5) and patients treated with dasatinib (DA, n = 9), imatinib (IM, n = 4) or nilotinib (NI, n = 6) were compared by 1way ANOVA.
Table 1. Patient characteristics
#
Gender
TKI
1st or 2nd line
Age at sampling (y)
Therapy time at sampling (m)
Best response
1
M
DA
2nd 1
55.7
72
CCgR
2
F
DA
2nd 2
31.3
58
CMR
3
F
DA
2nd 1
65.1
6
CMR
4
M
DA
2nd 1
66.8
50
CMR
5
M
DA
2nd 1
70.6
30
MMR
6
M
DA
1st
47.5
24
CCgR
7
F
DA
1st
73.0
20
CMR
8
F
DA
1st
45.7
30
CMR
9
M
DA
1st
48.4
29
CMR
10
F
DA
1st
45.9
10
CMR
11
M
DA
1st
48.9
NA
MMR
12
F
DA
1st
51.1
NA
CMR
13
F
IM
1st
43.9
82
CMR
14
M
IM
1st
41.1
24
CMR
15
F
IM
1st
68.2
12
CMR
16
F
IM
1st
51.4
30
CMR
17
M
IM
1st
52.6
NA
MMR
18
F
IM
1st
53.0
NA
CCgR
19
M
IM
1st
43.7
NA
MMR
20
F
IM
1st
55.1
NA
CCgR
21
F
NI
1st
47.6
6
CCgR
22
F
NI
1st
53.4
42
CMR
23
M
NI
1st
51.0
36
CMR
24
F
NI
1st
52.2
36
MMR
25
M
NI
1st
61.0
6
CCyR
26
M
NI
1st
60.9
6
CCgR
27
F
NI
1st
58.6
9
MMR
28
M
NI
1st
49.5
NA
MMR
The study included 28 chronic phase CML patients treated with dasatinib (DA; second-line n = 5, first-line n = 7), imatinib (IM; n = 8) or nilotinib (NI; n = 8). Abbrevations: Dg, diagnosis; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; y, years; m, months; F, female; M, male; not applicable (therapy months at sampling are given only for those patients whose samples were used for functional assays); MCyR, major cytogenetic response, CCyR, complete cytogenetic response; CMR, complete molecular response; MMR, major molecular response; intolerant for imatinib therapy, resistant for imatinib therapy.
To study the TNF-α and IFN-γ production separately, samples from 5 patients (frozen PBMNCs from 1 imatinib-, 2 nilotinib-, and 2 dasatinib-treated patients) were analyzed with the antibodies separately. In both dasatinib- and nilotinib-treated patientsGrB+ T-cells (both CD4 and CD8) were responsible for IFN-γ production (Fig. 4A and B, upper panels), and GrBneg T-cells produced considerably less IFN-γ. In the imatinib-treated patient, a very few T-cells produced IFN-γ upon stimulation (Fig. 4C, upper panels). In all TKI groups, both GrB+ and GrBneg produced TNF-α (Fig. 4A–C, lower panels).
Figure 4. Granzyme B positive T-cells in dasatinib-treated CML patients produce mainly IFN-γ. Fresh PBMNCs were stimulated with OKT3 and co-stimulatory molecules (α-CD28 and α-CD49d) for 6 h in the presence of Golgi STOP. After the stimulation, Th1-type cytokine (TNF-α and IFN-γ) production in T-cells was measured separately by flow cytometry. The figure presents a representative dasatinib- (A), nilotinib- (B), and imatinib- (C) treated patient (patient nr 6, 23, and 14 in Table 1).
Figure 4. Granzyme B positive T-cells in dasatinib-treated CMLpatients produce mainly IFN-γ. Fresh PBMNCs were stimulated with OKT3 and co-stimulatory molecules (α-CD28 and α-CD49d) for 6 h in the presence of Golgi STOP. After the stimulation, Th1-type cytokine (TNF-α and IFN-γ) production in T-cells was measured separately by flow cytometry. The figure presents a representative dasatinib- (A), nilotinib- (B), and imatinib- (C) treated patient (patient nr 6, 23, and 14 in Table 1).
TKI intake decreases cytokine production in T-cells, but does not inhibit it completely
As TKIs are reported to inhibit T-cell function in vitro,- we studied the effect of TKI intake on cytokine production. PB samples were collected before the patients took their daily drug dose and 1h after dasatinib, and 2h after nilotinib and imatinib intake (approximated peak plasma levels). In parallel, the absolute number of GrB+CD4+ and GrB+CD8+ T-cells were determined. As a control, we also studied the cytokine production of T-cells in in vitro cultures were dasatinib was constantly present.Dasatinib intake significantly increased the absolute number of GrB+CD4+ (P = 0.002) and GrB+CD8+ (P = 0.0039) T-cells in the blood (Fig. 5A). No significant increase was observed after imatinib intake, but nilotinib decreased the number of GrB+CD4+ T-cells (P = 0.03) (Fig. 5B and C).
Figure 5. Dasatinib intake decreases the absolute number of Granzyme B positive (GrB+) CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells and decreases cytokine production. Fresh PBMNCs were stimulated with OKT3 and co-stimulatory molecules (α-CD28 and α-CD49d) for 6 h in the presence of Golgi STOP. After the stimulation, Th1-type cytokine (TNF-α and IFN-γ) production in T-cells was measured by flow cytometry. The absolute counts of GrB+CD4+ and GrB+CD8+ T-cells in CML patients before (0h) and after (1 or 2 h) the patients’ daily dose of dasatinib (DA, panel A), imatinib (IM, panel B), and nilotinib (NI, panel C). Panel (D) shows the percentage of cytokine-producing GrB+ T-cells in these patients before and after the drug intake. Cytokine production before and after drug intake was analyzed with paired t test.
Figure 5. Dasatinib intake decreases the absolute number of Granzyme B positive (GrB+) CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells and decreases cytokine production. Fresh PBMNCs were stimulated with OKT3 and co-stimulatory molecules (α-CD28 and α-CD49d) for 6 h in the presence of Golgi STOP. After the stimulation, Th1-type cytokine (TNF-α and IFN-γ) production in T-cells was measured by flow cytometry. The absolute counts of GrB+CD4+ and GrB+CD8+ T-cells in CMLpatients before (0h) and after (1 or 2 h) the patients’ daily dose of dasatinib (DA, panel A), imatinib (IM, panel B), and nilotinib (NI, panel C). Panel (D) shows the percentage of cytokine-producing GrB+ T-cells in these patients before and after the drug intake. Cytokine production before and after drug intake was analyzed with paired t test.In contrast, the proportion of cytokine producing GrB+ T-cells reduced after dasatinib intake. This was accordant with the in vitro results showing that when dasatinib is constantly present, the cytokine production is inhibited (data not shown). However, despite the relative decrease of cytokine producing GrB+ T-cells, dasatinib-treated patients still had a significant population of active, cytokine producing GrB+ T-cells in the blood as the absolute number of GrB+ T-cells was increased 1h post drug intake. No significant differences in the T-cell function were observed after imatinib (P = 0.50) or nilotinib (P = 0.15) intake (Fig. 5D).
Discussion
Increasing evidence suggests that TKIs have pronounced immunomodulatory off-target effects, which may play a role in their therapeutic efficacy both in patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors (such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors).- The results, however, are still controversial as recently reviewed by us. In vitro studies have pointed out that the effects on the immune cells are merely suppressive or inhibitory,,,- whereas we and others have reported opposite immunostimulatory effects in vivo.,,,,,- The results presented in this paper support the immunostimulatory role of dasatinib and show that dasatinib therapy not only increases the amount of cytotoxic memory GrB+CD8+ T-cells, but also increases the amount of highly active GrB+CD4+ T-cells in opposite to the other TKIs (imatinib, nilotinib). These results suggest that the promotion of Th1-type immune responses together with increased amount of cytotoxic cells may play a role in the therapy outcome of dasatinib treated patients.CML is known to be one of the most immunogenic cancers, and anti-CML-specific T-cells can be found in untreated patients.- Our current observations confirm that newly-diagnosed CMLpatients have increased amount of late, antigen experienced CD8+ and CD4+ T-cells defined by the expression of GrB. Similar results were obtained by the analysis of different memory subsets of T-cells characterized by CCR7 and CD45RA expression as untreated CMLpatients had an increased proportion of the memory T-cell subsets when compared with healthy donors. These both observations are signs of cytotoxic immunoactivation in CMLpatients. Interestingly, when these T-cell subsets were studied in follow-up samples after the patients began on dasatinib, imatinib or nilotinib therapy, we observed that marked changes occurred only during dasatinib therapy. The proportion of circulating GrB+CD8 T-cells further increased from the diagnostic phase situation almost 2-fold by the 6 mo after the start of dasatinib therapy. The most prominent changes, however, occurred in the number and type of GrB+CD4+ T-cells. Six months treatment with dasatinib was associated with the 3-fold higher proportion and 5-fold increase in the absolute number of circulating GrB+CD4+ T-cells compared with the situation at diagnosis. Similar results were obtained when the memory status of the T-cells was studied by CCR7 and CD45RA expression, as dasatinib treatment further increased the percentage of TEMRA CD4+ T-cells.In dasatinib-treated patients the GrB+CD4+ T-cells were highly active and responded to stimulation by secreting considerable amounts of Th1-type cytokines IFN-γ and TNF-α. In healthy individuals, GrB+CD4+ T-cells are rarely seen. In other malignancies, there are a few reports suggesting that these cells play a role in anti-tumor activity. In a melanomamice model it has been reported that CD4+ T-cells are able to expand and differentiate into IFN-γ-secreting cytotoxic CD4+ T-cells. In addition, the cytotoxic activity correlated with the high levels of GrB. Similarly, in the myelomamice model it was shown that CD4+ T-cells were able to mediate primary anti-tumor immune responses by secreting IFN-γ and TNF-α. Furthermore, in humans, CD4+ T-cells have been described to recognize and lyse foreign leukemic target cells without the lysis of nonmalignant remission cells from the same patient.Interestingly, GrB+CD4+ T-cells may also have an effect on the other cells involved in tumor immunosurveillance. We have previously shown that long-term dasatinib therapy decreases the number of regulatory T-cells (Tregs), which is especially prominent in patients with the expansion of large granular lymphocytes.,, Earlier publications suggest that CD4+ responder T-cells may alter the function of Tregs. These cells produce GrB in response to strong T-cell receptor stimulation and in this manner they are able to kill effector Tregs. Similarly, a study by Janikashvili et al. showed that effector-memory CD4+ T-cells are capable of impairing tumor-induced immunosuppressive Tregs, which was dependent on the production of IFN-γ. This might be one of the explanations why Tregs are downregulated in dasatinib-treated CMLpatients as we found that GrB+ T-cells produce considerable amounts of IFN-γ in dasatinib-treated patients, which was not the case in imatinib- or nilotinib-treated patients.To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the effects of short-term TKI exposure in vivo on T-cell function. Similarly as in the previous studies,,,, we noticed that dasatinib inhibits the T-cell function when constantly present in in vitro cultures. However, in vivo in patients the pharmacokinetics of dasatinib differs markedly from the other TKIs., The drug half-life is considerably short, only a few hours, and the peak plasma concentrations occur already at 1 h after the drug intake. It could be argued that the constant presence of dasatinib in in vitro cultures does not mimic the real situation in patients. Therefore, we collected blood samples both before and after TKI intake, and the functional assays were performed on freshly isolated cells. Our results show that the short-term in vivo dasatinib exposure decrease the cytokine production of GrB+ T-cells concordant with the earlier in vitro findings, but it did not inhibit it completely. Further, even though the proportion of cytokine producing T-cells decreased, the absolute number of these cells remained the same (ie. above the level seen in other TKI-treated patients or healthy controls) as lymphocyte counts increased after 1h of dasatinib intake. Together with increased NK-cell cytotoxicity observed after dasatinib intake in our previous studies, this could result in enhanced anti-leukemia immune activity in dasatinib-treated patients.In conclusion, 2nd generation TKI dasatinib therapy does not only increase the number of memory CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, but also generates a strong Th1-type immune response in these cells. These data support the dual mode of action of dasatinib: the BCR-ABL1 inhibition in leukemic cells is accompanied by enhancement of cellular immunity, which may have implications in the long-term control of Ph+ leukemia.
Patients and Methods
Study patients and samples
The study included chronic phase CMLpatients on imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib treatment (Table 1). The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki declaration and was approved by the Helsinki University Central Hospital Ethics Committee. Written informed consents were obtained from all patients included in this study.The study included 28 chronic phase CMLpatients treated with dasatinib (DA; second-line n = 5, first-line n = 7), imatinib (IM; n = 8) or nilotinib (NI; n = 8). Abbrevations: Dg, diagnosis; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; y, years; m, months; F, female; M, male; not applicable (therapy months at sampling are given only for those patients whose samples were used for functional assays); MCyR, major cytogenetic response, CCyR, complete cytogenetic response; CMR, complete molecular response; MMR, major molecular response; intolerant for imatinib therapy, resistant for imatinib therapy.Fresh peripheral blood (PB) EDTA samples were collected from the patients and healthy controls. Samples from the patients were collected before and 1 or 2 h after the daily dose of their drug (dasatinib, imatinib, or nilotinib). Mononuclear cells (MNCs) were separated by Ficoll gradient centrifugation (GE healthcare). Results of routine laboratory tests (blood cell counts, differential analysis of leukocytes) were obtained from all patients before and after the intake of the daily drug dose.
T-cell phenotyping
T-cell phenotyping was performed on fresh PBMNC or follow-up samples stored in liquid nitrogen. For the analysis of GrB+ T-cells, the cells were first stained for cell surface markers; α-CD45 APC-H7 (BD 641417), α-CD3 APC (BD 345767), α-CD4 PerCP (BD 345770), and α-CD8PE-Cy7 (BD 335822), and then fixed and permeabilized with Fix/Perm (BD 554714), and intracellular GrB was stained (Alexa Fluor 700, BD 561016)). The memory cell subsets of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells were studied by the following panel: α-CD45-APC-H7, α-CD3-PeCy7 (BD 557851), α-CD4-PerCP, α-CD45RA AlexaFluor700 (BD 560673) and α-CCR7-PE (R&D Systems FAB197P). 50´000 CD45+ cells were acquired with FACSAria (BD) and analyzed with FlowJo.
Activation assay of peripheral T-cells
Fresh PBMNCs were re-suspended in RPMI (10% FBS, penicillin, 1% streptomycin and 1% l-glutamin; all Lonza) and stimulated with OKT3 (5μg/ml, BD 555329), α-CD28 (1μg/ml, BD 340975) and α-CD49d (1μg/ml, BD 340976) in the presence of Golgi STOP (BD 554724). After 6 h of incubation in 37 °C, the cells were harvested and washed. The cells were stained as following: α-CD45 APC-H7, α-CD3 APC, α-CD4 PerCP, and α-CD8PE-Cy7. After the staining of surface markers, the cells were fixed and permeabilized with Fix/Perm according to manufacturer’s instructions. Intracellular TNF-α (FITC, BD 554512), IFN-γ (FITC, BD 554700), and GrB (Alexa 700) were stained and 50´000 CD45+ cells were acquired with FACSAria (BD) and analyzed with FlowJo (version 9.1, TreeStar).
Statistical analysis
All statistics were done with GraphPad Prism software (version 5.0c; GraphPad) using nonparametric Mann–Whitney t test to compare two groups, 1way ANOVA to compare several groups, and paired t test to study the significance between paired observations before and after drug intake.
Authors: Moshe Talpaz; Neil P Shah; Hagop Kantarjian; Nicholas Donato; John Nicoll; Ron Paquette; Jorge Cortes; Susan O'Brien; Claude Nicaise; Eric Bleickardt; M Anne Blackwood-Chirchir; Vishwanath Iyer; Tai-Tsang Chen; Fei Huang; Arthur P Decillis; Charles L Sawyers Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-06-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sergio A Quezada; Tyler R Simpson; Karl S Peggs; Taha Merghoub; Jelena Vider; Xiaozhou Fan; Ronald Blasberg; Hideo Yagita; Pawel Muranski; Paul A Antony; Nicholas P Restifo; James P Allison Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2010-02-15 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Giuseppe Saglio; Dong-Wook Kim; Surapol Issaragrisil; Philipp le Coutre; Gabriel Etienne; Clarisse Lobo; Ricardo Pasquini; Richard E Clark; Andreas Hochhaus; Timothy P Hughes; Neil Gallagher; Albert Hoenekopp; Mei Dong; Ariful Haque; Richard A Larson; Hagop M Kantarjian Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J Chen; A Schmitt; B Chen; M Rojewski; V Rübeler; F Fei; Y Yu; X Yu; M Ringhoffer; S von Harsdorf; J Greiner; M Götzz; P Guillaume; H Döhner; D Bunjes; M Schmitt Journal: J Cell Mol Med Date: 2008-01-11 Impact factor: 5.310
Authors: Lin Lin; Jacob Couturier; Xiaoying Yu; Miguel A Medina; Claudia A Kozinetz; Dorothy E Lewis Journal: BMC Immunol Date: 2014-09-24 Impact factor: 3.615
Authors: Charles A Schiffer; Jorge E Cortes; Andreas Hochhaus; Giuseppe Saglio; Philipp le Coutre; Kimmo Porkka; Satu Mustjoki; Hesham Mohamed; Neil P Shah Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-03-21 Impact factor: 6.860