Literature DB >> 25080570

Modification of persistent responses in medial prefrontal cortex during learning in trace eyeblink conditioning.

Jennifer J Siegel1.   

Abstract

Persistent spiking in response to a discrete stimulus is considered to reflect the active maintenance of a memory for that stimulus until a behavioral response is made. This response pattern has been reported in learning paradigms that impose a temporal gap between stimulus presentation and behavioral response, including trace eyeblink conditioning. However, it is unknown whether persistent responses are acquired as a function of learning or simply represent an already existing category of response type. This fundamental question was addressed by recording single-unit activity in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of rabbits during the initial learning phase of trace eyeblink conditioning. Persistent responses to the tone conditioned stimulus were observed in the mPFC during the very first training sessions. Further analysis revealed that most cells with persistent responses showed this pattern during the very first training trial, before animals had experienced paired training. However, persistent cells showed reliable decreases in response magnitude over the first training session, which were not observed on the second day of training or for sessions in which learning criterion was met. This modification of response magnitude was specific to persistent responses and was not observed for cells showing phasic tone-evoked responses. The data suggest that persistent responses to discrete stimuli do not require learning but that the ongoing robustness of such responses over the course of training is modified as a result of experience. Putative mechanisms for this modification are discussed, including changes in cellular or network properties, neuromodulatory tone, and/or the synaptic efficacy of tone-associated inputs.
Copyright © 2014 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  delay cells; persistent activity; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25080570      PMCID: PMC4274915          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00372.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  48 in total

1.  Temporal patterns of inputs to cerebellum necessary and sufficient for trace eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  Brian E Kalmbach; Tatsuya Ohyama; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Modulation of dorsolateral prefrontal delay activity during self-organized behavior.

Authors:  Emmanuel Procyk; Patricia S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Dominance of the proximal coordinate frame in determining the locations of hippocampal place cell activity during navigation.

Authors:  Jennifer J Siegel; Joshua P Neunuebel; James J Knierim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Excitatory response of prefrontal cortical fast-spiking interneurons to ventral tegmental area stimulation in vivo.

Authors:  Kuei Y Tseng; Nicolas Mallet; Kathy L Toreson; Catherine Le Moine; François Gonon; Patricio O'Donnell
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  Anatomical analysis of afferent projections to the medial prefrontal cortex in the rat.

Authors:  Walter B Hoover; Robert P Vertes
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 3.270

6.  Interactions between prefrontal cortex and cerebellum revealed by trace eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  Brian E Kalmbach; Tatsuya Ohyama; Joy C Kreider; Frank Riusech; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Spontaneous changes of neocortical code for associative memory during consolidation.

Authors:  Kaori Takehara-Nishiuchi; Bruce L McNaughton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Single-unit activity in the medial prefrontal cortex during immediate and delayed extinction of fear in rats.

Authors:  Chun-hui Chang; Joshua D Berke; Stephen Maren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Adaptive, behaviorally gated, persistent encoding of task-relevant auditory information in ferret frontal cortex.

Authors:  Jonathan B Fritz; Stephen V David; Susanne Radtke-Schuller; Pingbo Yin; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Sustained conditioned responses in prelimbic prefrontal neurons are correlated with fear expression and extinction failure.

Authors:  Anthony Burgos-Robles; Ivan Vidal-Gonzalez; Gregory J Quirk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  5 in total

1.  Long Trace Eyeblink Conditioning Is Largely Preserved in Essential Tremor.

Authors:  Kasja Solbach; Simba-Joshua Oostdam; Martin Kronenbuerger; Dagmar Timmann; Marcus Gerwig
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Trace Eyeblink Conditioning in Mice Is Dependent upon the Dorsal Medial Prefrontal Cortex, Cerebellum, and Amygdala: Behavioral Characterization and Functional Circuitry

Authors:  Jennifer J Siegel; William Taylor; Richard Gray; Brian Kalmbach; Boris V Zemelman; Niraj S Desai; Daniel Johnston; Raymond A Chitwood
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2015-07-10

3.  Theta synchronization between medial prefrontal cortex and cerebellum is associated with adaptive performance of associative learning behavior.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Yi-jie Wang; Li Yang; Jian-feng Sui; Zhi-an Hu; Bo Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Prefrontal Single-Neuron Responses after Changes in Task Contingencies during Trace Eyeblink Conditioning in Rabbits.

Authors:  Jennifer J Siegel
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-07-18

5.  Visual Sequences Drive Experience-Dependent Plasticity in Mouse Anterior Cingulate Cortex.

Authors:  Michael S Sidorov; Hyojin Kim; Marie Rougie; Brittany Williams; Jennifer J Siegel; Jeffrey P Gavornik; Benjamin D Philpot
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 9.423

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.