Mika Skeppholm1, Leif Friberg. 1. Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Department of Medicine/Solna, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, mika.skeppholm@ds.se.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treatment with warfarin greatly reduces the risk of stroke related to atrial fibrillation, but will not be effective unless patients adhere to treatment. Lack of fixed dosing makes it difficult to objectively estimate adherence to treatment from prescription data. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate two methods that assess adherence to warfarin from prescription data. DESIGN: Retrospective study of Swedish health care registers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Age- and sex-specific dose requirements were determined from approx. 1 million blood tests and dosing instructions. By applying these dosages to 163,785 warfarin-treated patients with atrial fibrillation, we calculated the quantity of warfarin that was needed to keep these patients on effective treatment during a mean follow-up of 3.9 years and compared that with the dispensed quantities. The ratio of available drug/time at risk constitutes a measure of adherence on group level. In addition, time intervals between refills were used to assess discontinuation. RESULTS: Both methods showed that 45% of the patients did not have enough warfarin to last 80% of the time at risk. Between 16 and 21% of the patients discontinued within the first year, followed by 8-9% annually during the following years. Patients with high bleeding risk and patients with low embolic risk showed lower endurance. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to treatment with warfarin can be estimated on group level from prescription data and may be useful for comparison of adherence with warfarin and new oral anticoagulants. When applied to a large warfarin-treated cohort with atrial fibrillation, we found that adherence is low and that measures aiming for improvements are needed .
BACKGROUND: Treatment with warfarin greatly reduces the risk of stroke related to atrial fibrillation, but will not be effective unless patients adhere to treatment. Lack of fixed dosing makes it difficult to objectively estimate adherence to treatment from prescription data. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate two methods that assess adherence to warfarin from prescription data. DESIGN: Retrospective study of Swedish health care registers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Age- and sex-specific dose requirements were determined from approx. 1 million blood tests and dosing instructions. By applying these dosages to 163,785 warfarin-treated patients with atrial fibrillation, we calculated the quantity of warfarin that was needed to keep these patients on effective treatment during a mean follow-up of 3.9 years and compared that with the dispensed quantities. The ratio of available drug/time at risk constitutes a measure of adherence on group level. In addition, time intervals between refills were used to assess discontinuation. RESULTS: Both methods showed that 45% of the patients did not have enough warfarin to last 80% of the time at risk. Between 16 and 21% of the patients discontinued within the first year, followed by 8-9% annually during the following years. Patients with high bleeding risk and patients with low embolic risk showed lower endurance. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to treatment with warfarin can be estimated on group level from prescription data and may be useful for comparison of adherence with warfarin and new oral anticoagulants. When applied to a large warfarin-treated cohort with atrial fibrillation, we found that adherence is low and that measures aiming for improvements are needed .
Authors: A John Camm; Gregory Y H Lip; Raffaele De Caterina; Irene Savelieva; Dan Atar; Stefan H Hohnloser; Gerhard Hindricks; Paulus Kirchhof Journal: Europace Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Stephen E Kimmel; Zhen Chen; Maureen Price; Catherine S Parker; Joshua P Metlay; Jason D Christie; Colleen M Brensinger; Craig W Newcomb; Frederick F Samaha; Robert Gross Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-02-12
Authors: Stuart J Connolly; Janice Pogue; John Eikelboom; Gregory Flaker; Patrick Commerford; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Jeffrey S Healey; Salim Yusuf Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-10-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Stuart J Connolly; Michael D Ezekowitz; Salim Yusuf; John Eikelboom; Jonas Oldgren; Amit Parekh; Janice Pogue; Paul A Reilly; Ellison Themeles; Jeanne Varrone; Susan Wang; Marco Alings; Denis Xavier; Jun Zhu; Rafael Diaz; Basil S Lewis; Harald Darius; Hans-Christoph Diener; Campbell D Joyner; Lars Wallentin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-08-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christopher Ll Morgan; Phil McEwan; Andrzej Tukiendorf; Paul A Robinson; Andreas Clemens; Jonathan M Plumb Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2008-12-04 Impact factor: 3.944
Authors: Jan W Schrickel; Markus Linhart; Dietmar Bänsch; Daniel Thomas; Georg Nickenig Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-10-29 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: S Kochhäuser; H H Lohmann; M A Ritter; P Leitz; F Güner; S Zellerhoff; C Korsukewitz; D G Dechering; J Banken; N M Peters; L Eckardt; G Mönnig Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Marion Ferner; Daniel Wachtlin; Torsten Konrad; Oliver Deuster; Thomas Meinertz; Stephan von Bardeleben; Thomas Münzel; Monika Seibert-Grafe; Günter Breithardt; Thomas Rostock Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-06-25 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Sean D Pokorney; DaJuanicia N Holmes; Laine Thomas; Gregg C Fonarow; Peter R Kowey; James A Reiffel; Daniel E Singer; James V Freeman; Bernard J Gersh; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Elaine M Hylek; Gerald V Naccarelli; Michael D Ezekowitz; Jonathan P Piccini; Eric D Peterson Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Marc N Hirt; Aljosha Muttardi; Thomas M Helms; Hendrik van den Bussche; Thomas Eschenhagen Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 5.460