INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the clinical utility of quantitative diffusion tensor tractography (DTT) and tractography-based core analysis (TBCA) of the cingulum by defining the reproducibility, normal values, and findings in traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: Eighty patients with TBI and normal routine MRI and 78 controls underwent MRI at 3T. To determine reproducibility, 12 subjects were scanned twice. Superior (SC) and inferior (IC) cingulum were analyzed separately by DTT (fractional anisotropy (FA) thresholds 0.15 and 0.30). TBCA was performed from volumes defined by tractography with gradually changed FA thresholds. FA values were correlated with clinical and neuropsychological data. RESULTS: The lowest coefficient of variation was obtained at DTT threshold 0.30 (2.0 and 2.4 % for SC and IC, respectively), but in proportion to standard deviations of normal controls, the reproducibility of TBCA was better in SC and similar to that of DTT in IC. In patients with TBI, volume reduction with loss of peripheral fibers was relatively common; mean FA was mostly normal in these tractograms. The frequency of FA reductions (>2 SD) was in DTT smaller than in TBCA, in which FA decrease was present in 42 (13.1 %) of the 320 measurements. Central FA values in SC predicted visuoperceptual ability, and those in left IC predicted cognitive speed, language, and communication ability (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tractography-based measurements have sufficient reproducibility for demonstration of severe abnormalities of the cingulum. TBCA is preferential for clinical FA analysis, because it measures corresponding areas in patients and controls without inaccuracies due to trauma-induced structural changes.
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the clinical utility of quantitative diffusion tensor tractography (DTT) and tractography-based core analysis (TBCA) of the cingulum by defining the reproducibility, normal values, and findings in traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: Eighty patients with TBI and normal routine MRI and 78 controls underwent MRI at 3T. To determine reproducibility, 12 subjects were scanned twice. Superior (SC) and inferior (IC) cingulum were analyzed separately by DTT (fractional anisotropy (FA) thresholds 0.15 and 0.30). TBCA was performed from volumes defined by tractography with gradually changed FA thresholds. FA values were correlated with clinical and neuropsychological data. RESULTS: The lowest coefficient of variation was obtained at DTT threshold 0.30 (2.0 and 2.4 % for SC and IC, respectively), but in proportion to standard deviations of normal controls, the reproducibility of TBCA was better in SC and similar to that of DTT in IC. In patients with TBI, volume reduction with loss of peripheral fibers was relatively common; mean FA was mostly normal in these tractograms. The frequency of FA reductions (>2 SD) was in DTT smaller than in TBCA, in which FA decrease was present in 42 (13.1 %) of the 320 measurements. Central FA values in SC predicted visuoperceptual ability, and those in left IC predicted cognitive speed, language, and communication ability (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tractography-based measurements have sufficient reproducibility for demonstration of severe abnormalities of the cingulum. TBCA is preferential for clinical FA analysis, because it measures corresponding areas in patients and controls without inaccuracies due to trauma-induced structural changes.
Authors: Savannah C Partridge; Pratik Mukherjee; Jeffrey I Berman; Roland G Henry; Steven P Miller; Ying Lu; Orit A Glenn; Donna M Ferriero; A James Barkovich; Daniel B Vigneron Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Seung Ok Baek; Oh Lyong Kim; Seong Ho Kim; Min Soo Kim; Su Min Son; Yoon Woo Cho; Woo Mok Byun; Sung Ho Jang Journal: NeuroRehabilitation Date: 2013 Impact factor: 2.138
Authors: K Kantarci; M L Senjem; R Avula; B Zhang; A R Samikoglu; S D Weigand; S A Przybelski; H A Edmonson; P Vemuri; D S Knopman; B F Boeve; R J Ivnik; G E Smith; R C Petersen; C R Jack Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-05-18 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Elisabeth A Wilde; Marco A Ramos; Ragini Yallampalli; Erin D Bigler; Stephen R McCauley; Zili Chu; Trevor C Wu; Gerri Hanten; Randall S Scheibel; Xiaoqi Li; Ana C Vásquez; Jill V Hunter; Harvey S Levin Journal: Dev Neuropsychol Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.253
Authors: S N Niogi; P Mukherjee; J Ghajar; C Johnson; R A Kolster; R Sarkar; H Lee; M Meeker; R D Zimmerman; G T Manley; B D McCandliss Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-02-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Eva M Palacios; Roser Sala-Llonch; Carme Junque; Teresa Roig; Jose M Tormos; Nuria Bargallo; Pere Vendrell Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Jeong-Hee Yang; Han Do Lee; So Young Kwak; Ki Hyun Byun; Sung Ho Park; Dongseok Yang Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 1.889