| Literature DB >> 31190835 |
Georgios Nikolakaros1,2, Timo Kurki3,4, Arttu Myllymäki1, Tuula Ilonen5.
Abstract
Background: Wernicke's encephalopathy (WE) and Korsakoff syndrome (KS) are underdiagnosed. The DSM-5 has raised the diagnostic threshold by including KS in the major neurocognitive disorders, which requires that the patient needs help in everyday activities.Entities:
Keywords: Korsakoff syndrome; Wernicke encephalopathy; alcoholism; depressive disorder; diffusion tensor imaging; neurocognitive disorders
Year: 2019 PMID: 31190835 PMCID: PMC6535456 DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S203513
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat ISSN: 1176-6328 Impact factor: 2.570
Results of memory tests for a patient with Korsakoff syndrome
| Cognitive domain | Test | Z-score |
|---|---|---|
| Working memory | ||
| Verbal | WAIS-IIIa, Letter-Number Sequencing | |
| Visual | WMS-IIIb, Spatial Span | –1 |
| Episodic memory | ||
| Immediate recall | ||
| Verbal (logical) | WMS-IIIb, Logical Memory I | |
| Verbal (word list) | WMS-IIIb, Verbal Paired Associates | –0.67 |
| Verbal (word list) | WMS-IIIb, Word Lists | |
| Visual | WMS-IIIb, Visual Reproduction I | –0.67 |
| Delayed recall | ||
| Verbal (logical) | WMS-IIIb, Logical memory II | |
| Verbal (word list) | WMS-IIIb, Verbal Paired Associates | –1 |
| Verbal (word list) | WMS-IIIb, Word lists | |
| Visual | WMS-IIIb, Visual Reproduction II | –0.67 |
| Recognition | ||
| Verbal | WMS-IIIb, Logical Memory II + Verbal | |
| Paired Associates II | ||
| WMS-IIIb, Word Lists | ||
| Visual | WMS-IIIb, Visual Recognition |
Notes: Values of –1.5 or less (Z-score) are in bold. The patient’s results were compared to age-adjusted normative values. aWechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–III. bWechsler Memory Scale-III.
Results of neuropsychological tests other than memory for a patient with Korsakoff syndrome
| Cognitive domain | Test | Z–score |
|---|---|---|
| General cognitive level | Vocabulary subset (WAIS–IIIa) | –0.67 |
| General knowledge | Information subset (WAIS–IIIa) | |
| General attention | Trail Making Test A | 0.82 |
| Divided attention | Trail Making Test B | 0 |
| Psychomotor speed | Digit Symbol subset (WAIS–IIIa) | –1 |
| Executive functions I (set shifting) | ||
| Orbital prefrontal functions | WCSTb, number of perseverative errors | |
| Dorsolateral prefrontal functions | WCSTb, number of categories completed | |
| Executive functions II (task switching) | Trail B – Trail A score | –0.82 |
Notes: Z-score values ≤–1.5 (≤–1 for the WCST test) are in bold. The patient’s results were compared to age-adjusted normative values. aWechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–III. bWisconsin Card Scoring Test.
Brain MRI volumetric analyses in a patient with Korsakoff syndrome.
| Brain area | Volume (ml) | % value | Z-score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brain stem | 18.2 | 29 | –0.55 |
| Hemispheric gray matter total | 598 | 56 | 0.15 |
| Hemispheric gray matter right | 300 | 57 | 0.18 |
| Hemispheric gray matter left | 298 | 54 | 0.10 |
| Hemispheric white matter | 404 | 7 | |
| Cerebrospinal fluid | 49.2 | 94 | |
| Entorhinal area, right | 2.71 | 85 | 1.04 |
| Entorhinal area, left | 2.25 | 51 | 0.03 |
| Hippocampus, right | 3.67 | 27 | –0.61 |
| Hippocampus, left | 3.22 | 10 | |
| Amygdala, right | 1.17 | 47 | –0.08 |
| Amygdala, left | 1.13 | 32 | –0.47 |
| Nucleus accumbens, right | 0.34 | 4 | |
| Nucleus accumbens, left | 0.33 | 1 | |
| Caudate nucleus, right | 2.79 | 7 | |
| Caudate nucleus, left | 2.65 | 3 | |
| Pallidum, right | 1.29 | 9 | |
| Pallidum, left | 1.29 | 12 | |
| Putamen, right | 4.74 | 66 | 0.41 |
| Putamen, left | 4.63 | 48 | –0.05 |
| Thalamus, right | 7.13 | 7 | |
| Thalamus, left | 7.32 | 8 | |
| Hypothalamus, right | 4.17 | 7 | |
| Hypothalamus, left | 4.21 | 4 | |
| Cerebellar vermal lobules I - V | 3.41 | 10 | |
| Cerebellar vermal lobules VI -VII | 1.61 | 13 | |
| Cerebellar vermal lobules VIII - X | 2.19 | 9 | |
| Cerebellum exterior, right | 49 | 23 | –0.74 |
| Cerebellum exterior, left | 49.8 | 36 | –0.36 |
| Cerebellum white matter, right | 11.7 | 15 | |
| Cerebellum white matter, left | 11.9 | 23 | –0.74 |
| Mammillary bodies (right + left) | 112 | 9 |
Notes: The volume of the mammillary bodies was compared to 20 healthy controls. For the rest of the brain areas, the cNeuro cMRI software was used. Values <–1 (for gray or white matter brain areas) and >1 (for CSF areas) are in bold.
Fractional anisotropy (FA) values from diffusion tensor imaging in a patient with Korsakoff syndrome
| White matter tract | Tractography threshold | Z-score |
|---|---|---|
| Corpus callosum genu | 0.50/27 | –1.2 |
| Corpus callosum body | 0.50/27 | –1.1 |
| Corpus callosum splenium | 0.50/27 | –0.8 |
| Superior cingulum, right | 0.15/27 | |
| Superior cingulum, left | 0.15/27 | |
| Inferior cingulum, right | 0.15/27 | |
| Inferior cingulum, left | 0.15/27 | |
| Subgenual cingulum, right | 0.15/27 | |
| Subgenual cingulum, left | 0.15/27 | |
| Uncinate fasciculus, right | 0.15/27 | |
| Uncinate fasciculus, left | 0.15/27 | |
| Superior longitudinal fasciculus, right | 0.15/27 | |
| Superior longitudinal fasciculus, left | 0.15/27 | –1.2 |
| Inferior longitudinal fasciculus, right | 0.15/27 | |
| Inferior longitudinal fasciculus, left | 0.15/27 | |
| Arcuate fasciculus, left | 0.15/27 | |
| Inferior fronto–occipital fasciculus, right | 0.15/27 | –1.3 |
| Inferior fronto–occipital fasciculus, left | 0.15/27 | –1.4 |
| Anterior corona radiata, right | 0.15/27 | |
| Anterior corona radiata, left | 0.15/27 | –1.5 |
| Frontostriatal projection fibers, right | 0.15/27 | –1.6 |
| Frontostriatal projection fibers, left | 0.15/27 | –1.9 |
| Mesencephalic projections, right | 0.30/27 | –1.5 |
| Mesencephalic projections, left | 0.30/27 | −0.3 |
| Fornix, right | 0.15/40 | –1.8 |
| Fornix, left | 0.15/40 | |
| Descending fornix, right | 0.15/40 | |
| Descending fornix, left | 0.15/40 | –1.7 |
Notes: Z-scores represent the difference from the mean of controls with one standard deviation as the unit. Values ≤–2 are in bold.
Figure 1MRI sagittal image showing mild mammillary body atrophy (white arrow) and mild vermis atrophy (black arrow).
Figure 2Tractograms of the patient (A, B, C) and a control subject (D, E, F). The control subject’s tractograms are of average size. The superior cingulum is in blue, the inferior cingulum is in green, and the corpus callosum is in red (A, B, D, E). The fasciculus uncinatus is in magenta (C, F). The patients’ tractograms (except for the corpus callosum) are markedly smaller than the tractograms of the control. R, Right side, L, Left side.