| Literature DB >> 25078890 |
Fiona Sewell1, Kathryn Chapman2, Paul Baldrick3, David Brewster4, Alan Broadmeadow5, Paul Brown6, Leigh Ann Burns-Naas7, Janet Clarke8, Alex Constan9, Jessica Couch10, Oliver Czupalla11, Andy Danks12, Joseph DeGeorge13, Lolke de Haan14, Klaudia Hettinger15, Marilyn Hill16, Matthias Festag17, Abby Jacobs6, David Jacobson-Kram6, Stephan Kopytek18, Helga Lorenz19, Sophia Gry Moesgaard20, Emma Moore21, Markku Pasanen22, Rick Perry23, Ian Ragan24, Sally Robinson25, Petra M Schmitt26, Brian Short27, Beatriz Silva Lima28, Diane Smith29, Sue Sparrow30, Yvette van Bekkum31, David Jones32.
Abstract
An international expert group which includes 30 organisations (pharmaceutical companies, contract research organisations, academic institutions and regulatory bodies) has shared data on the use of recovery animals in the assessment of pharmaceutical safety for early development. These data have been used as an evidence-base to make recommendations on the inclusion of recovery animals in toxicology studies to achieve scientific objectives, while reducing animal use. Recovery animals are used in pharmaceutical development to provide information on the potential for a toxic effect to translate into long-term human risk. They are included on toxicology studies to assess whether effects observed during dosing persist or reverse once treatment ends. The group devised a questionnaire to collect information on the use of recovery animals in general regulatory toxicology studies to support first-in-human studies. Questions focused on study design, the rationale behind inclusion or exclusion and the impact this had on internal and regulatory decisions. Data on 137 compounds (including 53 biologicals and 78 small molecules) from 259 studies showed wide variation in where, when and why recovery animals were included. An analysis of individual study and programme design shows that there are opportunities to reduce the use of recovery animals without impacting drug development.Entities:
Keywords: 3Rs; Dog; Non-clinical; Primate; Recovery; Reduction; Regulatory toxicology; Repeat-dose studies; Reversibility; Rodent
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25078890 DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.07.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ISSN: 0273-2300 Impact factor: 3.271