Literature DB >> 25078291

Effects of orbitofrontal cortex lesions on autoshaped lever pressing and reversal learning.

Stephen E Chang1.   

Abstract

A cue associated with a rewarding event can trigger behavior towards the cue itself due to the cue acquiring incentive value through its pairing with the rewarding outcome (i.e., sign-tracking). For example, rats will approach, press, and attempt to "consume" a retractable lever conditioned stimulus (CS) that signals delivery of a food unconditioned stimulus (US). Attending to food-predictive CSs is important when seeking out food, and it is just as important to be able to modify one's behavior when the relationships between CSs and USs are changed. Using a discriminative autoshaping procedure with lever CSs, the present study investigated the effects of orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) lesions on sign-tracking and reversal learning. Insertion of one lever was followed by sucrose delivery upon retraction, and insertion of another lever was followed by nothing. After the acquisition phase, the contingencies between the levers and outcomes were reversed. Bilateral OFC lesions had no effect on the acquisition of sign-tracking. However, OFC-lesioned rats showed substantial deficits in acquiring sign-tracking compared to sham-lesioned rats once the stimulus-outcome contingencies were reversed. Over the course of reversal learning, OFC-lesioned rats were able to reach comparable levels of sign-tracking as sham-lesioned rats. These findings suggest that OFC is not necessary for the ability of a CS to acquire incentive value and provide more evidence that OFC is critical for modifying behavior appropriately following a change in stimulus-outcome contingencies.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autoshaping; Goal-tracking; Incentive salience; Orbitofrontal cortex; Reversal learning; Sign-tracking

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25078291      PMCID: PMC4150849          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.07.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  23 in total

1.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  The contribution of orbitofrontal cortex to action selection.

Authors:  Sean B Ostlund; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Encoding predicted outcome and acquired value in orbitofrontal cortex during cue sampling depends upon input from basolateral amygdala.

Authors:  Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Barry Setlow; Michael P Saddoris; Michela Gallagher
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Orbitofrontal lesions in rats impair reversal but not acquisition of go, no-go odor discriminations.

Authors:  Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Summer L Nugent; Michael P Saddoris; Barrry Setlow
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Effects of excitotoxic lesions in the ventral striatopallidal--thalamocortical pathway on odor reversal learning: inability to extinguish an incorrect response.

Authors:  A T Ferry; X C Lu; J L Price
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Lesions of orbitofrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala complex disrupt acquisition of odor-guided discriminations and reversals.

Authors:  Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Barry Setlow; Summer L Nugent; Michael P Saddoris; Michela Gallagher
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Effects of nucleus accumbens core and shell lesions on autoshaped lever-pressing.

Authors:  Stephen E Chang; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Disconnection of the anterior cingulate cortex and nucleus accumbens core impairs Pavlovian approach behavior: further evidence for limbic cortical-ventral striatopallidal systems.

Authors:  J A Parkinson; P J Willoughby; T W Robbins; B J Everitt
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Quantifying individual variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to reward cues.

Authors:  Paul J Meyer; Vedran Lovic; Benjamin T Saunders; Lindsay M Yager; Shelly B Flagel; Jonathan D Morrow; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  The role of glutamate signaling in incentive salience: second-by-second glutamate recordings in awake Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Seth R Batten; Francois Pomerleau; Jorge Quintero; Greg A Gerhardt; Joshua S Beckmann
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 5.372

2.  Disconnection of basolateral amygdala and insular cortex disrupts conditioned approach in Pavlovian lever autoshaping.

Authors:  Helen M Nasser; Danielle S Lafferty; Ellen N Lesser; Sam Z Bacharach; Donna J Calu
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  NMDA receptor blockade specifically impedes the acquisition of incentive salience attribution.

Authors:  Jonathan J Chow; Joshua S Beckmann
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Suboptimal choice in rats: Incentive salience attribution promotes maladaptive decision-making.

Authors:  Jonathan J Chow; Aaron P Smith; A George Wilson; Thomas R Zentall; Joshua S Beckmann
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Voluntary alcohol access during adolescence/early adulthood, but not during adulthood, causes faster omission contingency learning.

Authors:  Charles L Pickens; Paige Kallenberger; Alisa Pajser; Hayley Fisher
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Insula lesions reduce stimulus-driven control of behavior during odor-guided decision-making and autoshaping.

Authors:  Heather J Pribut; Xavier A Sciarillo; Matthew R Roesch
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Basolateral amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex, but not dorsal hippocampus, are necessary for the control of reward-seeking by occasion setters.

Authors:  Kurt M Fraser; Patricia H Janak
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 4.415

8.  Evidence for a shared representation of sequential cues that engage sign-tracking.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Smedley; Kyle S Smith
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 1.729

9.  Isolating the incentive salience of reward-associated stimuli: value, choice, and persistence.

Authors:  Joshua S Beckmann; Jonathan J Chow
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Functional heterogeneity within the rodent lateral orbitofrontal cortex dissociates outcome devaluation and reversal learning deficits.

Authors:  Marios C Panayi; Simon Killcross
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.