Sun M Ahn1, Jason Y K Chan1, Zhe Zhang2, Hao Wang2, Zubair Khan1, Justin A Bishop3, William Westra3, Wayne M Koch1, Joseph A Califano4. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. Division of Biostatics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland4Milton J. Dance Head and Neck Center, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) is a major causative factor in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). The detection of primary OPSCC is often delayed owing to the challenging anatomy of the oropharynx. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of HPV-16 DNA detection in pretreatment and posttreatment plasma and saliva and its potential role as a marker of prognosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected cohort. Among a cohort of patients with oropharyngeal and unknown primary squamous cell carcinoma with known HPV-16 tumor status from the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions and Greater Baltimore Medical Center (from 1999 through 2010), 93 patients were identified with a complete set of pretreatment and posttreatment plasma or saliva samples, of which 81 patients had HPV-16-positive tumors and 12 patients had HPV-16-negative tumors. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to detect HPV-16 E6 and E7 DNA in saliva and plasma samples. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Main outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value of combined saliva and plasma pretreatment HPV-16 DNA status for detecting tumor HPV-16 status, as well as the association of posttreatment HPV DNA status with clinical outcomes, including recurrence-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 49 months (range, 0.9-181.0 months). The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of combined saliva and plasma pretreatment HPV-16 DNA status for detecting tumor HPV-16 status were 76%, 100%, 42%, and 100%, respectively. The sensitivities of pretreatment saliva or plasma alone were 52.8% and 67.3%, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, positive posttreatment saliva HPV status was associated with higher risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 10.7; 95% CI, 2.36-48.50) (P = .002). Overall survival was reduced among those with posttreatment HPV-positive status in saliva (HR, 25.9; 95% CI, 3.23-208.00) (P = .002) and those with HPV-positive status in either saliva or plasma but not among patients with HPV-positive status in plasma alone. The combined saliva and plasma posttreatment HPV-16 DNA status was 90.7% specific and 69.5% sensitive in predicting recurrence within 3 years. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Using a combination of pretreatment plasma and saliva can increase the sensitivity of pretreatment HPV-16 status as a tool for screening patients with HPV-16-positive OPSCC. In addition, analysis of HPV-16 DNA in saliva and plasma after primary treatment may allow for early detection of recurrence in patients with HPV-16-positive OPSCC.
IMPORTANCE: Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) is a major causative factor in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). The detection of primary OPSCC is often delayed owing to the challenging anatomy of the oropharynx. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of HPV-16 DNA detection in pretreatment and posttreatment plasma and saliva and its potential role as a marker of prognosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected cohort. Among a cohort of patients with oropharyngeal and unknown primary squamous cell carcinoma with known HPV-16tumor status from the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions and Greater Baltimore Medical Center (from 1999 through 2010), 93 patients were identified with a complete set of pretreatment and posttreatment plasma or saliva samples, of which 81 patients had HPV-16-positive tumors and 12 patients had HPV-16-negative tumors. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to detect HPV-16 E6 and E7 DNA in saliva and plasma samples. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Main outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value of combined saliva and plasma pretreatment HPV-16 DNA status for detecting tumorHPV-16 status, as well as the association of posttreatment HPV DNA status with clinical outcomes, including recurrence-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 49 months (range, 0.9-181.0 months). The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of combined saliva and plasma pretreatment HPV-16 DNA status for detecting tumorHPV-16 status were 76%, 100%, 42%, and 100%, respectively. The sensitivities of pretreatment saliva or plasma alone were 52.8% and 67.3%, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, positive posttreatment saliva HPV status was associated with higher risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 10.7; 95% CI, 2.36-48.50) (P = .002). Overall survival was reduced among those with posttreatment HPV-positive status in saliva (HR, 25.9; 95% CI, 3.23-208.00) (P = .002) and those with HPV-positive status in either saliva or plasma but not among patients with HPV-positive status in plasma alone. The combined saliva and plasma posttreatment HPV-16 DNA status was 90.7% specific and 69.5% sensitive in predicting recurrence within 3 years. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Using a combination of pretreatment plasma and saliva can increase the sensitivity of pretreatment HPV-16 status as a tool for screening patients with HPV-16-positive OPSCC. In addition, analysis of HPV-16 DNA in saliva and plasma after primary treatment may allow for early detection of recurrence in patients with HPV-16-positive OPSCC.
Authors: Maura L Gillison; Tatevik Broutian; Robert K L Pickard; Zhen-you Tong; Weihong Xiao; Lisa Kahle; Barry I Graubard; Anil K Chaturvedi Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: R B Capone; S I Pai; W M Koch; M L Gillison; H N Danish; W H Westra; R Daniel; K V Shah; D Sidransky Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ming Zhao; Eli Rosenbaum; Andre Lopes Carvalho; Wayne Koch; Weiwen Jiang; David Sidransky; Joseph Califano Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2005-11-20 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Jeffrey M Vainshtein; Matthew E Spector; Matthew H Stenmark; Carol R Bradford; Gregory T Wolf; Francis P Worden; Douglas B Chepeha; Jonathan B McHugh; Thomas Carey; Ka Kit Wong; Avraham Eisbruch Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2013-12-31 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Anil K Chaturvedi; Eric A Engels; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Brenda Y Hernandez; Weihong Xiao; Esther Kim; Bo Jiang; Marc T Goodman; Maria Sibug-Saber; Wendy Cozen; Lihua Liu; Charles F Lynch; Nicolas Wentzensen; Richard C Jordan; Sean Altekruse; William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Maura L Gillison Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: T D Kessis; R J Slebos; W G Nelson; M B Kastan; B S Plunkett; S M Han; A T Lorincz; L Hedrick; K R Cho Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1993-05-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Elizabeth A Sisk; Scott G Soltys; Shaobo Zhu; Susan G Fisher; Thomas E Carey; Carol R Bradford Journal: Head Neck Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Julia M L Brotherton; Mark Jit; Patti E Gravitt; Marc Brisson; Aimée R Kreimer; Sara I Pai; Carole Fakhry; Joseph Monsonego; Silvia Franceschi Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Paul L Swiecicki; Julia R Brennan; Michelle Mierzwa; Matthew E Spector; J Chad Brenner Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Gypsyamber D'Souza; Gwendolyn Clemens; Tanya Troy; Rachel G Castillo; Linda Struijk; Tim Waterboer; Noemi Bender; Phillip M Pierorazio; Simon R Best; Howard Strickler; Dorothy J Wiley; Robert I Haddad; Marshall Posner; Carole Fakhry Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2019-08-16
Authors: Laura Martin-Gomez; Anna R Giuliano; William J Fulp; Jimmy Caudell; Michelle Echevarria; Bradley Sirak; Martha Abrahamsen; Kimberly A Isaacs-Soriano; Juan C Hernandez-Prera; Bruce M Wenig; Kathryn Vorwald; Caitlin P McMullen; J Trad Wadsworth; Robbert J Slebos; Christine H Chung Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Aadel A Chaudhuri; Michael S Binkley; Evan C Osmundson; Ash A Alizadeh; Maximilian Diehn Journal: Semin Radiat Oncol Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 5.934
Authors: Mary Roz Timbang; Michael W Sim; Arnaud F Bewley; D Gregory Farwell; Avinash Mantravadi; Michael G Moore Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Matthew E Spector; Janice L Farlow; Catherine T Haring; J Chad Brenner; Andrew C Birkeland Journal: Discov Med Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.970