Literature DB >> 25077910

Two-year follow-up evaluation of surgical treatment for thoracolumbar fracture-dislocation.

Dingjun Hao1, Wentao Wang, Kun Duan, Minjie Ma, Yong Jiang, Tuanjiang Liu, Baorong He.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A randomized, controlled clinical trial.
OBJECTIVE: This randomized controlled clinical trial was aimed at comparing the clinical outcomes of combined posteroanterior (P-A) fusion and transforaminal thoracic interbody fusion (TTIF) in cases of thoracolumbar fracture-dislocation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The optimal treatment strategy for thoracolumbar fracture-dislocation remains controversial.
METHODS: Sixty-one patients presenting with acute fracture-dislocation of the thoracolumbar joint between March 2010 and December 2011 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the P-A or TTIF group. The radiological outcome was assessed by acquiring radiographs in the standing position and computed tomographic scans. The clinical outcome was measured in terms of the American Spinal Injury Association score, visual analogue scale score, and Oswestry Disability Index. Moreover, we assessed the severity of overall morbidity and morbidity at the donor site in the 2 patient groups. The Student t and χ tests were used for the analysis of independent variables and categorical data, respectively.
RESULTS: Only 57 of the enrolled patients were available for the required 24-month follow-up period, 27 underwent TTIF and 30 underwent P-A fusion. Both treatments were similar with respect to the fusion rate, extent of decompression, loss of correction, rate of instrumentation failure, American Spinal Injury Association score, visual analogue scale score, and Oswestry Disability Index (P > 0.05). However, the blood loss, operating time, and rate of perioperative complications were greater in the P-A group than in the TTIF group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The clinical and radiological outcomes were similar for both the treatment procedures. However, our findings suggest that TTIF allows for safe interbody fusion and circumferential decompression, requires only a posterior approach, and is associated with a lower incidence of surgery-related complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25077910     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of thoracolumbar fracture.

Authors:  Byung-Guk Kim; Jin-Myoung Dan; Dong-Eun Shin
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-02-13

2.  Surgical Considerations to Improve Recovery in Acute Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Troy Q Tabarestani; Nicholle E Lewis; Margot Kelly-Hedrick; Nina Zhang; Brianna R Cellini; Eric J Marrotte; Theresa Williamson; Haichen Wang; Daniel T Laskowitz; Timothy D Faw; Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-09-30

3.  Retrospective analysis of reasons and revision strategy for failed thoracolumbar fracture surgery by posterior approach: a series of 31 cases.

Authors:  Haiping Zhang; Tao Li; Honghui Sun; Jun Zhang; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.940

Review 4.  Minimally invasive resection of extradural dumbbell tumors of thoracic spine: surgical techniques and literature review.

Authors:  Chunbo Li; Yun Ye; Yutong Gu; Jian Dong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Thoracolumbar fractures without neurological impairment: A review of diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  G Vilà-Canet; A García de Frutos; A Covaro; M T Ubierna; E Caceres
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-03-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.