Homa Keshavarz1, Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis2, David L Streiner3, Rice Maureen1, Usman Ali1, Harry S Shannon1, Parminder Raina1. 1. McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Centre and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. 2. McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Centre and School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton Ont. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. ; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care has a guideline on screening for depression among adults 18 years of age or older at average or high risk for depression. To provide evidence for an update of this guideline, we evaluated the literature on the effectiveness of screening for depression in adults. METHODS: For the period 1994 to May 23, 2012, we searched the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Randomized controlled trials, observational studies and systematic reviews with evidence for the benefits or harms of screening for depression were eligible for inclusion. We performed screening for relevance, extraction of data, analysis of risk of bias and quality assessments in duplicate. We used the generic inverse variance method to conduct a meta-analysis. To determine confidence in the effect, we analyzed the results according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS: Five quasi-experimental studies (before-after design with a nonrandomized control group) met the inclusion criteria for this review. These studies reported on the effect of community-based screening for depression, with follow-up on the risk of suicide completion, for older residents in regions of rural Japan with high suicide rates. Meta-analysis showed that the screening program had a protective effect on the overall incidence of suicide completion (ratio of rate ratios [RRR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.78). When sex was considered, the RRR indicated a significantly lower rate of suicide among women (RRR 0.37, 95% CI 0.21-0.66) but not among men (RRR 0.67, 95% CI 0.35-1.27). The overall GRADE rating applied to this evidence indicated very low quality. No studies addressing the harms of screening for depression met the inclusion criteria for the review. INTERPRETATION: There is very limited research evidence allowing conclusions about the effectiveness of screening for depression in either average-risk or high-risk populations.
BACKGROUND: The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care has a guideline on screening for depression among adults 18 years of age or older at average or high risk for depression. To provide evidence for an update of this guideline, we evaluated the literature on the effectiveness of screening for depression in adults. METHODS: For the period 1994 to May 23, 2012, we searched the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Randomized controlled trials, observational studies and systematic reviews with evidence for the benefits or harms of screening for depression were eligible for inclusion. We performed screening for relevance, extraction of data, analysis of risk of bias and quality assessments in duplicate. We used the generic inverse variance method to conduct a meta-analysis. To determine confidence in the effect, we analyzed the results according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS: Five quasi-experimental studies (before-after design with a nonrandomized control group) met the inclusion criteria for this review. These studies reported on the effect of community-based screening for depression, with follow-up on the risk of suicide completion, for older residents in regions of rural Japan with high suicide rates. Meta-analysis showed that the screening program had a protective effect on the overall incidence of suicide completion (ratio of rate ratios [RRR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.78). When sex was considered, the RRR indicated a significantly lower rate of suicide among women (RRR 0.37, 95% CI 0.21-0.66) but not among men (RRR 0.67, 95% CI 0.35-1.27). The overall GRADE rating applied to this evidence indicated very low quality. No studies addressing the harms of screening for depression met the inclusion criteria for the review. INTERPRETATION: There is very limited research evidence allowing conclusions about the effectiveness of screening for depression in either average-risk or high-risk populations.
Authors: Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Gunn E Vist; Regina Kunz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Holger J Schünemann Journal: BMJ Date: 2008-04-26
Authors: Michel Joffres; Alejandra Jaramillo; James Dickinson; Gabriela Lewin; Kevin Pottie; Elizabeth Shaw; Sarah Connor Gorber; Marcello Tonelli Journal: CMAJ Date: 2013-05-13 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Scott B Patten; Jian Li Wang; Jeanne V A Williams; Shawn Currie; Cynthia A Beck; Colleen J Maxwell; Nady El-Guebaly Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Elizabeth R Pfoh; Isabel Janmey; Amit Anand; Kathryn A Martinez; Irene Katzan; Michael B Rothberg Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-06-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Raymond W Lam; Diane McIntosh; JianLi Wang; Murray W Enns; Theo Kolivakis; Erin E Michalak; Jitender Sareen; Wei-Yi Song; Sidney H Kennedy; Glenda M MacQueen; Roumen V Milev; Sagar V Parikh; Arun V Ravindran Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Michelle Roseman; Nazanin Saadat; Kira E Riehm; Lorie A Kloda; Jill Boruff; Abel Ickowicz; Franziska Baltzer; Laurence Y Katz; Scott B Patten; Cécile Rousseau; Brett D Thombs Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Vincent I O Agyapong; Kelly Mrklas; Michal Juhás; Joy Omeje; Arto Ohinmaa; Serdar M Dursun; Andrew J Greenshaw Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2016-11-08 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Oloruntoba J Oluboka; Martin A Katzman; Jeffrey Habert; Diane McIntosh; Glenda M MacQueen; Roumen V Milev; Roger S McIntyre; Pierre Blier Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 5.176