Literature DB >> 25077114

Prescribed targets for titration of vasopressors in septic shock: a retrospective cohort study.

Charles St-Arnaud1, Jean-François Ethier2, Cindy Hamielec3, Andrew Bersten4, Gordon Guyatt5, Maureen Meade5, Qi Zhou5, Marc-André Leclair1, Alpesh Patel4, François Lamontagne2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Without robust clinical evidence to guide titration of vasopressors in septic shock, it is unclear how dosing of these potent medications occurs. We sought to measure the proportion of vasopressor prescriptions for septic shock that were missing explicit targets and to describe the targets that we identified.
METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective cohort study involving 9 intensive care units (ICUs) located at 3 academic hospitals in Canada and Australia. We reviewed charts of consecutive patients aged 18 years or older who were admitted to the ICU for a presumptive diagnosis of sepsis. Other inclusion criteria were hypotension (systolic arterial pressure ≤ 90 mm Hg or mean arterial pressure [MAP] ≤ 65 mm Hg) and continuous infusion of vasopressors for at least 1 hour within the initial 48 hours of ICU stay, the period of observation for this study.
RESULTS: We included data from 369 patient charts. At least 1 target was specified in 99% of charts. The most common targets were MAP measurements (73%). The median initial MAP target was 65 (range 55-90) mm Hg. In multivariable regression models, hospital site and older age of the patient, but not comorbidities of the patient, were associated with MAP targets. In 40% of patients, the treating team modified the initial target at least once.
INTERPRETATION: This study suggests that an explicit blood pressure target accompanies nearly every vasopressor prescription and that patient characteristics have little influence on its value. Identification of a titration strategy that will maximize benefit and minimize harm constitutes a research priority.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 25077114      PMCID: PMC3985969          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20130006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  13 in total

Review 1.  Vasoactive drugs in circulatory shock.

Authors:  Steven M Hollenberg
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care.

Authors:  D C Angus; W T Linde-Zwirble; J Lidicker; G Clermont; J Carcillo; M R Pinsky
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Increasing mean arterial pressure in patients with septic shock: effects on oxygen variables and renal function.

Authors:  Aurélie Bourgoin; Marc Leone; Anne Delmas; Franck Garnier; Jacques Albanèse; Claude Martin
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Nationwide trends of severe sepsis in the 21st century (2000-2007).

Authors:  Gagan Kumar; Nilay Kumar; Amit Taneja; Thomas Kaleekal; Sergey Tarima; Emily McGinley; Edgar Jimenez; Anand Mohan; Rumi Ahmed Khan; Jeff Whittle; Elizabeth Jacobs; Rahul Nanchal
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Autoregulation of renal blood flow, glomerular filtration rate and renin release in conscious dogs.

Authors:  H R Kirchheim; H Ehmke; E Hackenthal; W Löwe; P Persson
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.657

6.  Vasopressor administration and sepsis: a survey of Canadian intensivists.

Authors:  Francois Lamontagne; Deborah J Cook; Neill K J Adhikari; Matthias Briel; Mark Duffett; Michelle E Kho; Karen E A Burns; Gordon Guyatt; Alexis F Turgeon; Qi Zhou; Maureen O Meade
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.425

7.  Effects of perfusion pressure on tissue perfusion in septic shock.

Authors:  D LeDoux; M E Astiz; C M Carpati; E C Rackow
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Liberal vs. conservative vasopressor use to maintain mean arterial blood pressure during resuscitation of septic shock: an observational study.

Authors:  Sanjay Subramanian; Murat Yilmaz; Ahmer Rehman; Rolf D Hubmayr; Bekele Afessa; Ognjen Gajic
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Practice parameters for hemodynamic support of sepsis in adult patients: 2004 update.

Authors:  Steven M Hollenberg; Tom S Ahrens; Djillali Annane; Mark E Astiz; Donald B Chalfin; Joseph F Dasta; Stephen O Heard; Claude Martin; Lena M Napolitano; Gregory M Susla; Richard Totaro; Jean-Louis Vincent; Sergio Zanotti-Cavazzoni
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Association of arterial blood pressure and vasopressor load with septic shock mortality: a post hoc analysis of a multicenter trial.

Authors:  Martin W Dünser; Esko Ruokonen; Ville Pettilä; Hanno Ulmer; Christian Torgersen; Christian A Schmittinger; Stephan Jakob; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  5 in total

1.  Understanding patient-centredness: contrasting expert versus patient perspectives on vasopressor therapy for shock.

Authors:  Francois Lamontagne; Dian Cohen; Margaret Herridge
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Reduced exposure to vasopressors through permissive hypotension to reduce mortality in critically ill people aged 65 and over: the 65 RCT.

Authors:  Paul R Mouncey; Alvin Richards-Belle; Karen Thomas; David A Harrison; M Zia Sadique; Richard D Grieve; Julie Camsooksai; Robert Darnell; Anthony C Gordon; Doreen Henry; Nicholas Hudson; Alexina J Mason; Michelle Saull; Chris Whitman; J Duncan Young; François Lamontagne; Kathryn M Rowan
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Multi-complexity measures of heart rate variability and the effect of vasopressor titration: a prospective cohort study of patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Samuel M Brown; Jeffrey Sorensen; Michael J Lanspa; Matthew T Rondina; Colin K Grissom; Sajid Shahul; V J Mathews
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 4.  Next-generation, personalised, model-based critical care medicine: a state-of-the art review of in silico virtual patient models, methods, and cohorts, and how to validation them.

Authors:  J Geoffrey Chase; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jennifer L Dickson; Antoine Pironet; Yeong Shiong Chiew; Christopher G Pretty; Geoffrey M Shaw; Balazs Benyo; Knut Moeller; Soroush Safaei; Merryn Tawhai; Peter Hunter; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  The evolution of mean arterial pressure in critically ill patients on vasopressors before and during a trial comparing a specific mean arterial pressure target to usual care.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Masse; Neill K J Adhikari; Xavier Théroux; Marie-Claude Battista; Frédérick D'Aragon; Ruxandra Pinto; Alan Cohen; Michaël Mayette; Charles St-Arnaud; Michelle Kho; Michaël Chassé; Martine Lebrasseur; Irene Watpool; Rebecca Porteous; M Elizabeth Wilcox; François Lamontagne
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.217

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.